25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
The Federal Trade Commission has announced revised jurisdictional and filing fee thresholds under th...
Read More >
In April 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division published proposed rules deali...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The next round of employer obligations - primarily posting and notice requirement...
Read More >
Since #MeToo brought non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) into the spotlight, there has been a flurry of...
Read More >
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals changed its mind and decided to ask the California Supreme Court ...
Read More >
In the world of M&A and private equity deals, buyer-side representation and warranties insurance (RW...
Read More >