25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
As the Coronavirus (COVID-19) continues to disrupt travel and almost every other aspect of day-to-da...
Read More >
CHINESE OUTBOUND INVESTMENTS – THE SELLER’S PERSPECTIVE - 1. CHINESE REGULATION – 1.1 The Chi...
Read More >
While the California Labor Code specifies that an off-duty meal period must consist of at least 30 m...
Read More >
On May 31, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California awarded a $102 mill...
Read More >
As discussed in our prior blog entry, the IRS recently released final regulations making a number of...
Read More >
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: NBA to Rockets-We Got it Wrong But You Didn’t Tell S...
Read More >