25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
It has become somewhat of an annual tradition in California: with every new year comes a further inc...
Read More >
On June 8, 2020, Level 10 Construction, LP (“Level 10”), a construction company hired by Sea World...
Read More >
An employment tribunal recently found that a belief in ethical veganism is protected as a philosophi...
Read More >
Two years ago, TSW reported on several cases in which corporations outside of California successfull...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Google’s recent travails with simultaneous traditional and “reverse” discrimi...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 15, 2020, in Guzman v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc., No. 17-CV-02606-H...
Read More >