25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
On October 10, 2019, Governor Newsom signed AB 51, codified as Labor Code section 432.6, which prohi...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) announced that it had approved a ...
Read More >
The Code Committee ("Code Committee") of the UK Takeover Panel ("Panel") has published a consultatio...
Read More >
The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination in employment against persons who are d...
Read More >
On December 18, 2019, Cal/OSHA issued a news release outlining California’s fatal workplace injury ...
Read More >
In the wake of COVID-19 and the mass telework directives, the Premerger Notification Office of the F...
Read More >