25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
Legislatures across the country are racing to keep up with the ever-expanding uses of artificial int...
Read More >
Just ask Riot Games, which recently agreed to pay $10,000,000 to settle a class action lawsuit for a...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has failed – at least for now – in its efforts to derail a ...
Read More >
Directors and officers of private companies are responsible for managing and running business. This ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 30, 2020, the Maryland General Assembly voted to override Governor Lar...
Read More >
I’m always disappointed by appellate opinions that decide novel or unsettled issues in business div...
Read More >