25Aug
Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Section 14(a) Complaint For Failure to Plead Facts Demonstrating Alleged Omissions from Proxy Statement Were Misleading
In Heinze v. Tesco Corp., No. 19-20298, 2020 WL 4814094 (5th Cir. Aug. 19, 2020), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a putative class action suit under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), 15 U.S.C. § 78(b) alleging that defendant Tesco Corporation (“Tesco”), former members of Tesco’s board of directors and Nabors Industries, Ltd. (“Nabors”) omitted material information from a proxy statement issued in connection...
By:
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP
Related
More than 10,000 bills were filed during the 86th Texas legislative session. Some of the bills that ...
Read More >
Currently, state law mandates private employers with 15 or more employees to provide employees 30 da...
Read More >
A group of three major drug distributors—McKesson, AmerisourceBergen, and Cardinal Health—are in t...
Read More >
Prior to these changes, physicians and PAs had to enter into “delegation of services agreements,” ...
Read More >
In an important case for architects and design-builders, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeal...
Read More >
Administrators of Multiple Employer Plans (“MEPs”)–in which employers from different controlled ...
Read More >