28Jul
Should I Stay Or Should I Go? The Proliferation Of Litigation Over Buyers’ Attempts To Unilaterally Terminate M&A Transactions In the Wake Of COVID-19
The changed economic landscape caused by COVID-19, with a shortage of debt financing and volatility in the stock market, has resulted in a dramatic downtick in M&A activity. Not only are buyers skittish about making acquisitions in the first instance, many buyers are now faced with the difficult decision of whether to terminate pending deals that have been signed, but have not yet closed, based on the “material adverse effect” (“MAE”) clause contained in their merger agreements......
By:
Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Related
This month's key California employment law cases involve the Dynamex case and the effect of prior ad...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: U.S. District Court in New York issued a nationwide injunction blocking the impl...
Read More >
In Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis, 139 S. Ct. 1843 (2019), the Supreme Court of the United States ...
Read More >
There are two parts of the SECURE Act that I believe will have the greatest impact on plan sponsors ...
Read More >
On November 7, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey in Paige v. Atrion Commu...
Read More >
On Friday, January 10, 2020, Chief United States District Judge Kimberly Mueller of the Eastern Dist...
Read More >