X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

M&A Litigation Rising Amidst COVID-19 Uncertainty: Considerations for Litigators and Deal-Makers

Just as no human being is naturally immune to the COVID-19 virus, no industry is immune to its econo...

Read More >

Cal/OSHA Issues Coronavirus Guidance for Employers

The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) has released Interim Guidance f...

Read More >

Job Descriptions Must Accurately Reflect True Job Duties

A recent case from a federal court highlights the importance of accurate job descriptions. In Wiggin...

Read More >

What the HRA is going on with HRAs?

On June 13, the Departments of Labor, Treasury and Health and Human Services jointly released final ...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 11.19.2019 | Top Story: T-Mobile Chief John Legere to Leave Company in April

T-Mobile chief and fan-of-magenta John Legere has announced that he’ll be stepping down in April at...

Read More >

California’s AB5 Codifies Stricter Rules for Independent Contractors – What Wine Industry Employers Need to Know

California Governor Gavin Newsom has signed into law AB5, codifying a new test for distinguishing em...

Read More >