X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

[Video] Great Women in Compliance-Lauren Camilli on Compliance and Global Humanitarian Aid

Have you ever thought about what it would be like to work in a compliance program where you are also...

Read More >

Whistleblowing’s Renaissance

The potency of the hashtag #MeToo may have passed its zenith, but “paradigm shift” is still entire...

Read More >

NCAA Votes On Student Athlete Compensation

Responding to debate over paying college athletes, the NCAA recently opened the door to college athl...

Read More >

HR Two Minute Monthly: restrictive covenants; disability discrimination; covert recordings by employees

Our August 2019 update considers recent developments in employment law, including a key Supreme Cour...

Read More >

Arbitration Update: Federal Judge Prohibits California’s Mandatory Employee Arbitration Ban

As previously covered here, the California Legislature has long been searching for a way to prevent ...

Read More >

TRO Halts New Arbitration Law AB51

On December 30, 2019, a federal District Court issued a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against th...

Read More >