10Aug
Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision
Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/
Related
Simon Property Group, Inc. (“Simon”) wants out of a deal to acquire its competitor, Taubman Center...
Read More >
In its groundbreaking decision in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, 584 US ___, 138 S. Ct. 1612 (2018), t...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in Fort Bend County v. Davis that Title VI...
Read More >
Suppose a property owner hires a general contractor for a time-sensitive project. The general contr...
Read More >
Not quite two years ago, the Supreme Court decided the case of Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 138...
Read More >
Effective September 29, 2019, Illinois has amended the Illinois Equal Pay Act of 2003 to prohibit em...
Read More >