X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

What Employers Need To Know About The New Overtime Exemption Regulations

Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor issued its Final Rule regarding the salary thresholds that a...

Read More >

Dear You Dig: Digging Freedom

Dear YouDig? Freedom? The laws of construction sure don’t provide “Freedom.” It’s more like law...

Read More >

SECURE Act Expands Eligibility for 401(k) Deferrals

A December 27, 2019 post to this blog by Jon Nason provided an overview of the many changes affectin...

Read More >

Delaware Trial Court Interprets Coverage Under a D&O Policy to Include an Appraisal Action as a Securities Claim

Delaware courts have established rules of construction for interpreting insurance policies. Among th...

Read More >

Great distribution needs a good product

If you have a great product, but lousy distribution, you’re not going to do well. Yet the same thin...

Read More >

Oregon’s New Prohibitions and Requirements Regarding Pregnancy-Related Accommodations: What Employers Need to Know

On May 22, 2019, Oregon governor Kate Brown signed House Bill 2341. This bill expands on existing fe...

Read More >