10Aug
Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision
Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Following recent histrionics from the White House, ByteDance, “the Chinese internet giant that owns...
Read More >
Employers sometimes include fixed terms of employment in their employment agreement. Sometimes a fix...
Read More >
The Rhode Island Supreme Court recently held that the Airline Deregulation Act (ADA), a federal law,...
Read More >
The Southern District of New York declared that plaintiff Monjasa A/S was not bound by an arbitratio...
Read More >
Coronavirus is spreading and, while we cannot predict the scale of the illness and self-isolation, w...
Read More >
Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini analyzed a case in which two defendants – a former emplo...
Read More >