X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

Littler Lightbulb: Shining a Light on Key Issues as we Leap into 2020

The start of a new year always brings a fresh batch of employment concerns. While some workplace iss...

Read More >

Nvidia/Mellanox: China’s Close Scrutiny of Semiconductor Deals Continues

- On April 16, 2020, the Chinese competition authority finally announced its conditional approval of...

Read More >

Challenging times – the Use Classes Order and Permitted Development Rights

Aside from the long-awaited “Planning for the Future” White Paper, the big planning and developmen...

Read More >

[Audio] Construction and the Neighbors

Construction partner Laurie Stanziale and Litigation partner and host Rich Schoenstein discuss Const...

Read More >

The Latest on California’s Approach to Biometrics in the Workplace

Although California does not have a specific biometric privacy law like Illinois’s 2008 Biometric I...

Read More >

Delaware Supreme Court Examines Director Liability for Acquisitions

In McElrath v. Kalanick et al, the Delaware Supreme Court examined the liability of directors of Ube...

Read More >