X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

Federal Wage Laws Protect Cannabis Workers? Yes, They Do

So imagine that your biggest pothead friend from college has opened up a cannabis dispensary that se...

Read More >

NLRB’s Joint Employer Rule Signals a Welcome Return to Sensible Workplace Regulation

For countless companies that contract with other businesses for human capital or other services in w...

Read More >

AMI Mechanical to Pay $82,500 to Settle EEOC National Origin, Color and Retaliation Lawsuit

Plumbing Company Subjected Latino Employees to Hostile and Segregated Working Environment as Well as...

Read More >

Federal Court Taps Brakes On New York’s Sweeping New Farmworker Labor Law

New York’s Farm Laborers Fair Labor Practices Act went into effect on January 1, 2020. Two days ear...

Read More >

The Name of the Game in Design-Build Contracts? Document, Document, Document!

Design-build contracts (and their lesser utilized counterpart—engineering, procurement, and constru...

Read More >

What Labor Secretary Acosta’s Departure Means For Employers

When the news broke Friday afternoon that Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta would be resigning from h...

Read More >