21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Today, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) announced its Final Rule updating the salary threshold...
Read More >
Social media—from Facebook and Twitter to Instagram, LinkedIn, Reddit, YouTube, and more—has becom...
Read More >
The continuing rise of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues up public and corporate age...
Read More >
In its recent decision in R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow A...
Read More >
Newly Hired Employee Was Fired After Disclosing Brain Tumor, Federal Agency Charged - SEATTLE - Pr...
Read More >
Employers frustrated with the cumbersome rules and added expenses for furnishing plan documents, sum...
Read More >