21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Subcontractors have long celebrated—and general contractors long feared—the Texas Construction Tru...
Read More >
The Connecticut Fair Employment Practices Act (CFEPA”) protects employees from discrimination on th...
Read More >
Based on a set of somewhat unusual facts, a federal district court in Ohio ruled that an employer th...
Read More >
The IRS addressed key commercial and technical issues regarding the development and financing of car...
Read More >
Read the latest news on antitrust, competition and economic regulation (ACER) in this Autumn's editi...
Read More >
In June, the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) posted a new version of Form I-9 ...
Read More >