21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Recently Lisa Felix, one of the experienced employment based immigration lawyers at Klasko Immigrati...
Read More >
Governor of Oregon Kate Brown issued a state-wide Executive Order No. 20-12 on March 23, 2020, direc...
Read More >
The wait for new overtime rules is over. As you may recall, the U.S. Department of Labor released a...
Read More >
Human Services Provider Unlawfully Fired Employees Who Needed Medical Leave, Federal Agency Charged ...
Read More >
On Thursday, January 30, members from Verrill's Employment & Labor group, as well as some from the E...
Read More >
In the three-year old saga regarding anticipated changes to the minimum salary threshold for overtim...
Read More >