21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
During college in the 1970s, I spent my summers working as a framer in residential construction; I w...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In a 3-1 decision, the National Labor Relations Board (“Board”) in Johnson Cont...
Read More >
New Jersey employers face heightened risks and consequences for non-payment of wages, or wage theft,...
Read More >
COVID-19: Two Sides of the Same Coin - Introduction - Globally, the construction industry is lar...
Read More >
In the simplest case for federal preemption, federal law prohibits conduct that a state tort duty wo...
Read More >
The Tenth Circuit upheld a claims administrator’s decision denying a claim for residential mental h...
Read More >