21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
McDermott Will & Emery’s Family Office Tax Roundtable provides participants with an interactive vir...
Read More >
The Third Circuit Court of Appeals has held that online retailers such as Amazon could be held liabl...
Read More >
Time and money are often seen as going hand in hand in construction contracts. In a typical employer...
Read More >
In January, the Supreme Court agreed to accept an appeal filed by the State of Arkansas of a decisio...
Read More >
Investments in private companies by way of share purchases from existing shareholders (secondary tra...
Read More >
Businesses may employ minors in Massachusetts, but complying with Massachusetts child labor law invo...
Read More >