X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

NJ Supreme Court To Rule On Medical Marijuana Protections

The New Jersey Supreme Court announced it will review the Appellate Division’s decision in Wild v. ...

Read More >

French Competition Authority’s newest merger control guidelines: What is changing?

On July 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (the "Authority") published its new guidelines on...

Read More >

What Plan Sponsors and IRA Owners Need to Know About the SECURE Act

On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1865, the Further Consolidated Appropriat...

Read More >

Judge Grants Preliminary Injunction Prohibiting Enforcement of California’s Arbitration Ban

Judge Kimberly Mueller of the District Court for the Eastern District of California today granted Pl...

Read More >

Some random thoughts on the retirement plan business

1. Cost is an overused consideration for picking plan providers, value and quality are underused. 2...

Read More >

DOL should make e-disclosures the default

It’s 2019 and one area that the Department of Labor (DOL) could help both the retirement plan indus...

Read More >