21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
When I graduated from law school, it took a few months before I got my first job. So for the months,...
Read More >
Despite the proliferation of R&W insurance as the sole recourse for buyers with respect to sellers’...
Read More >
The 2019 novel coronavirus continues to evolve and has been officially named COVID-19 by the World H...
Read More >
The legislature’s second week was busy with committee hearings and press conferences where legislat...
Read More >
Turning a blind eye – one-off act not a PCP - In Ishola v Transport for London the Court of Appeal...
Read More >
On July 23, 2019, the Chicago City Council passed the Chicago Fair Workweek Ordinance (Ordinance). T...
Read More >