X
21May

An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion

Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By: Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/

Related

SBA Issues Much-Anticipated Guidance Regarding Changes of Ownership in PPP Loans

Unforgiven Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans have created a great deal of consternation for PP...

Read More >

Paint it black - bleak picture for Hong Kong decorators slammed for market sharing and price fixing

In one of its first major rulings, Hong Kong's Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") has ruled again...

Read More >

The Trump Administration Wants You to Know, Guidance is NOT Law!

Seyfarth Synopsis: Two new Executive Orders and a corresponding decision in the Supreme Court effect...

Read More >

Delaware Court Of Chancery Denies Motion To Dismiss Claims Regarding Squeeze-Out Merger Because Special Committee Members Were Allegedly "Interested"

On February 26, 2020, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery denied a motion...

Read More >