21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The Kansas Supreme Court recently reversed the Kansas Court of Appeals, and re-instated a three-plus...
Read More >
On June 30, 2020, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) (the Agenc...
Read More >
Welcome to the 22nd edition of our newsletter on developments in the automotive industry published b...
Read More >
In advance of their first official meeting of 2020, members of Philadelphia City Council outlined th...
Read More >
Have you ever wondered when Massachusetts’ 6-year statute of repose for defective design, planning ...
Read More >
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 does not prohibit all harassing conduct. Rather, the haras...
Read More >