21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The Oregon Court of Appeals recently issued a decision touching on the economic loss doctrine and vi...
Read More >
Last month, Governor Sisolak took to Twitter to celebrate signing two construction-related bills tha...
Read More >
Noteworthy – no holiday pro-rating for "part year" music teacher - In The Harpur Trust v Brazel th...
Read More >
Our construction team's regular guide to new and proposed legislation that will affect the UK constr...
Read More >
On September 18, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a defen...
Read More >
Under the wage orders issued by California’s Industrial Welfare Commission (IWC), “[a]ll working e...
Read More >