21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
The New Jersey Supreme Court announced it will review the Appellate Division’s decision in Wild v. ...
Read More >
On July 23, 2020, the French Competition Authority (the "Authority") published its new guidelines on...
Read More >
On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed into law H.R. 1865, the Further Consolidated Appropriat...
Read More >
Judge Kimberly Mueller of the District Court for the Eastern District of California today granted Pl...
Read More >
1. Cost is an overused consideration for picking plan providers, value and quality are underused. 2...
Read More >
It’s 2019 and one area that the Department of Labor (DOL) could help both the retirement plan indus...
Read More >