21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Unforgiven Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans have created a great deal of consternation for PP...
Read More >
- Under English law, force majeure clauses in contracts may allow parties to avoid their performance...
Read More >
This week’s Update features a number of updates on previous stories, including our recent story on ...
Read More >
In one of its first major rulings, Hong Kong's Competition Tribunal (the "Tribunal") has ruled again...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Two new Executive Orders and a corresponding decision in the Supreme Court effect...
Read More >
On February 26, 2020, Chancellor Andre G. Bouchard of the Delaware Court of Chancery denied a motion...
Read More >