21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/an-insurer-s-duty-to-defend-does-not-75277/
Related
Ask ten people in the industry to define a public-private partnership (P3), and you’ll probably get...
Read More >
A new federal rule has created a new electronic registration process for the annual H-1B lottery. Th...
Read More >
Welcome to the Great Women in Compliance Podcast, co-hosted by Lisa Fine and Mary Shirley. In this e...
Read More >
On February 19, 2020, the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) posted a Sci...
Read More >
On March 16, 2020, the City and County of San Francisco issued an order requiring all individuals in...
Read More >
Generally, contact tracing refers to an effort by public health officials to identify individuals wi...
Read More >