21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Attention contractors – have you heard about “negligent negotiations”? A trio of interesting – b...
Read More >
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has released its Upload File Specifications ...
Read More >
United States Army Corps of Engineers v. John C. Grimberg Co., Inc., No. 2019-1608, 2020 BL 215269 (...
Read More >
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Assignment Earth which aired...
Read More >
On November 5, 2019, the California Labor Commissioner cited Inventory Professionals Inc. and Trader...
Read More >
In a stark reminder of the sanctity of Coast Guard investigations, and the consequences of impeding ...
Read More >