21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In 2009, Nevada implemented mandatory safety training for employees performing work on construction ...
Read More >
Rules relating to tip credit and pooling have resulted in significant debate among legislators, regu...
Read More >
Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc., C.A. No. 2018-0730-JRS (Del. Ch. Sept. 9, 2019). Terminati...
Read More >
With the uncertainty of COVID-19 impacting construction projects in new and unfamiliar ways, choosin...
Read More >
The Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a Procedural Notice on October 2, 2020, detailing re...
Read More >
On January 1, 2017, Nevada became the fifth state to legalize the recreational use of marijuana. Sin...
Read More >