21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
On Friday, October 2, 2020, the Small Business Administration (SBA) issued a Procedural Notice (the ...
Read More >
The United States Army Corps of Engineers (Vicksburg District) (“Corps”) issued a September 18th p...
Read More >
The Washington State Supreme Court recently held obesity qualifies as an impairment under the Washin...
Read More >
Employers that completely or partially withdraw from underfunded multiemployer pension funds are wel...
Read More >
In France, the Professional Future Law of September 5, 2018, amended the Employment Obligation of Di...
Read More >
McDermott continues its dialogue with renewable industry leaders to provide the latest market update...
Read More >