21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Japan expanded the scope of industries subject to prior notification for Inward Direct Investment in...
Read More >
Part 2 in a PublicCEO Series - Previously, we discussed local governments’ response to the novel c...
Read More >
On Sept. 18, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB-5 into law, drastically altering how millions of California...
Read More >
In its 2012 Hosanna-Tabor decision, the U.S. Supreme Court first recognized the existence of a “min...
Read More >
A federal court in California has prevented, at least for now, an expansive anti-arbitration law fro...
Read More >
With the new year comes the likelihood that the U.S. Supreme Court, the California Supreme Court, an...
Read More >