21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. The Big Boys dance to a potential Exxon/Chevron Me...
Read More >
Intellectual Property – Copyright - Copyright Act Does Not Apply to Proposed Sale of Allegedly Unl...
Read More >
Starting January 1, 2020, the new Dutch Balanced Labor Market Act (Wet arbeidsmarkt in balans, WAB) ...
Read More >
The IRS recently amended the rules applicable to hardship distributions from 401(k) and 403(b) plans...
Read More >
Eleven cases have been filed against defined benefit pension plan sponsors and certain fiduciaries a...
Read More >
Traditional companies are responding to the challenge of digital disruption by partnering with techn...
Read More >