21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
Applying the “economic realities” test, the Fifth Circuit (with jurisdiction over federal courts i...
Read More >
Over the past few days, several Midwestern states have issued stay-at-home orders and closed non-ess...
Read More >
The classic 1989 film Back to the Future II famously predicted that humans would be zipping around o...
Read More >
Markets gave a warm welcome to the Biden administration on Wednesday, as strong tech performance and...
Read More >
Today two plaintiffs represented by the Texas Public Policy Foundation filed a lawsuit challenging t...
Read More >
Beginning January 1, 2020, new legislation in Nevada will require employers to think carefully about...
Read More >