21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
As part of our ongoing series on the SECURE Act, this post discusses two key changes affecting defin...
Read More >
On February 26, 2020, the IRS published proposed regulations implementing changes made by the Tax Cu...
Read More >
The US Department of Agriculture (USDA) issued a Notice of Availability and Request for Public Comme...
Read More >
1. What constitutes sexual harassment? As per Republic Act No. 7877,1 work, education or training-...
Read More >
The filing of class actions against California employers for meal and rest break violations remain a...
Read More >
Speculation about the impact of coronavirus and recent stock market volatility, including Thursday’...
Read More >