21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
The U.S. Department of Labor issued its bi-annual regulatory agenda update on November 20, 2019. Of...
Read More >
Employees with Disabilities Denied Reasonable Accommodations, Federal Agency Charges - Newburgh, N...
Read More >
The New Year brings new laws for Illinois employers. Some laws go into effect this Summer, while oth...
Read More >
As discussed in our prior alert, employers are now required to submit additional information to supp...
Read More >
This fall the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled against a subcontractor who failed to file an affidavit...
Read More >
Non-essential in-person activities have been restricted in New York State during the ongoing COVID-1...
Read More >