21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In addition to bolstering the provisions of its mini-WARN Act (see Part I), New Jersey Governor Phil...
Read More >
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revisited the treatment of prescription drug manuf...
Read More >
On April 6, 2018, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) issued Field Assistance Bulletin No. 2018-3 in ...
Read More >
The headline in The Washington Post said it all: “Fisher-Price invented a popular baby sleeper with...
Read More >
Is My New Hire an Employee or a Contractor? Key Factors for Startups to Consider Employee or contra...
Read More >
Drug giants Pfizer and Mylan have inked a deal that will merge the former’s off-patent drugs with t...
Read More >