21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
In our previous client alert, we reported that certain key changes were introduced to the United Ara...
Read More >
In September, Georgetown University Law Center hosted its 13th Annual Global Antitrust Enforcement S...
Read More >
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) issued a January 17th news release stat...
Read More >
Oregon’s paid family and medical leave law was signed by Governor Kate Brown on August 9, 2019. Eli...
Read More >
Introduction - Arbitration is simple. Parties select a person or persons — the arbitrator(s) — wh...
Read More >
In re: Essendant, Inc. Stockholder Litigation, C.A. No. 2018-0789-JRS (Del. Ch. Dec. 30, 2019). Whe...
Read More >