21May
An Insurer’s Duty to Defend does not Extend to a Construction Claim that Falls Clearly Within a Policy Exclusion
Like most states, Florida follows the rule that an insurer’s duty to defend is separate from and broader than its duty to indemnify for a potentially covered occurrence. Last week, in South Winds Construction Corp. v. Preferred Contractors Insurance...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
On December 16, 2019, in Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc., Case 28-CA-213783, the National Labor...
Read More >
Companies implement bonus plans to meet a variety of business objectives: retention, specific compa...
Read More >
"The ins and outs of I-9 Compliance," HR Dive - The I-9 process can cause confusion for many employ...
Read More >
The year 2020 was an eventful one in the world of healthcare antitrust. The year began with the anno...
Read More >
Welcome to the newest edition of Foley’s MarketTrends newsletter. In this issue, we focus on key le...
Read More >
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently released guidance in an FAQ to employers...
Read More >