X
10Jul

Failure to Specifically Challenge “Delegation” Clause in Arbitration Agreement Means Motion to Compel Arbitration “Must Be Granted”

Carlton Fields | | Return|
The plaintiff sued his former employer for discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment, and violations of the Missouri Human Rights Act. The defendant moved to compel arbitration based on the parties’ Mutual Agreement to Arbitrate (MAA)....
By: Carlton Fields
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/failure-to-specifically-challenge-59788/

Related

[Video] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 34- The Doomsday Machine

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode The Doomsday Machine which a...

Read More >

Open for Business: Outlook for European M&A Remains Positive Despite Geopolitical Headwinds

Geopolitical uncertainty and escalating trade tensions have combined to add additional layers of com...

Read More >

The MAE Clause Faces Off With COVID-19 in the Delaware Courts—What Comes Next?

While the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) continues to disrupt the global economy, it is also causing t...

Read More >

Colorado Court of Appeals Approves “Use or Lose It” Policy Regarding Vacation Pay

In an unpublished opinion, the Colorado Court of Appeals recently held that a departing employee's r...

Read More >

Fifth Circuit Adopts Definition of “Terminal” for LHWCA Cases

As noted by the court in International Matex Tank Terminals v. Director OWCP (Dwayne D. Victorian), ...

Read More >

Franchisor 101: The Wrong Tools to Avoid California Courts

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California Matco Tool franchisee, John Fleming, could bring a class a...

Read More >