X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

New York Lawmakers Expand Pay Equity Law and Ban Salary History Inquiries

On the heels of passing sweeping changes to New York’s harassment and discrimination laws, the stat...

Read More >

Bending the Rules of Standing: The De Facto Merger Doctrine

Business Divorce 101: To be entitled to an accounting of a closely-held business, the plaintiff or p...

Read More >

Nonemployee Compensation Reportable on Revived Form 1099-NEC for 2020 Payments

The Internal Revenue Service has revived Form 1099-NEC to eliminate confusion about complying with n...

Read More >

Important Considerations When Structuring M&A Transactions for Government Contractors: Pre-Transaction Part 1 of a 3-Part Series

M&A transactions involving government contractors carry several regulatory and industry-specific con...

Read More >

Forensic Due Diligence: Another Tick in the Box?

According to Refinitiv, a financial market data provider, the overall value of mergers and acquisiti...

Read More >

Buying or Selling a Business with a PPP Loan

There is a significant likelihood that M&A transactions in the next year may involve PPP loans. Here...

Read More >