X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Copyright in construction: some common queries

Questions about intellectual property rights routinely arise during construction contract negotiatio...

Read More >

CAS Legal Mailbag Question of the Week – January 2020 #3

Dear Legal Mailbag: Under our teacher contract, requests for leave come first to me as the building...

Read More >

CPSC Recall Snapshot: CPSC Agenda and Priorities for Fiscal Years 2020–2021

Welcome to the June edition of the Alston & Bird CPSC Recall Snapshot. In May, the CPSC held its pu...

Read More >

Nuclear Power Company Avoids ADA Discrimination Claim Meltdown

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Flaherty v. Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., ___ F.3d ___, No. 18-1759, 2019 ...

Read More >

Foreign investment in Australia’s energy and resources sector

Introduction - This guide is intended to supplement our popular Foreign Investment in Australia gui...

Read More >

Construction Projects and Disputes: A Look Beyond the COVID-19 Lockdown, Part II

It is becoming increasingly clear that the impact of the pandemic will continue to be felt once lock...

Read More >