X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Seyfarth Shaw Policy Matters Newsletter - November 2019 #2

Electronic H-2B Notifications Coming Soon. The Departments of Labor and Homeland Security issued a f...

Read More >

NLRB 2020 Predictor: It’s Good to be an Employer

As not just a new year but a new decade begins, we know from the closing days of 2019 that the Natio...

Read More >

Contract Corner: Divestiture Provisions in Software License and Services Contracts—Not a Big Deal Until You Need Them

Adding corporate flexibility to IT-related commercial contracts can make seemingly unrelated mergers...

Read More >

Financial Statement Reps

Market Trends: What You Need to Know - According to the American Bar Association's Private Target M...

Read More >

No California Waiting-Time, Inaccurate Wage Statement Penalties Based On Unpaid Meal Period Premiums, Court Rules

Do meal period premiums trigger derivative liability for waiting-time penalties and inaccurate wage ...

Read More >

Strategies for Uncertain Times: Management and Legal Perspectives for the Specialty Chemical Industry

As with virtually every sector, the COVID-19 pandemic heavily impacted the chemical industry—from c...

Read More >