X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

If a company has California employees is it subject to the CCPA?

Not necessarily. Although the CCPA’s definition of “consumer” includes employees that reside in ...

Read More >

Commercial Division Declines to Certify Class and Approve Settlement in Xerox-Fuji Case

There has been a new development in the Xerox and Fujifilm (“Fuji”) litigation: Justice Ostrager ...

Read More >

The BeNeLux competition authorities issue a Joint Memorandum on competition in a digital world

On 10 October 2019, the competition authorities of Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg (the "Aut...

Read More >

Amended Delaware Laws Allow Transactions to Be Documented Electronically, Among Other Changes

Governor John Carney recently signed legislation that will put into effect a variety of amendments t...

Read More >

Is The Coronavirus Event A Force Majeure Or Changed Condition Event?

While this coronavirus event grips the nation, contractors and subcontractors are asking whether thi...

Read More >

DOL’s Final Rule on Association Retirement Plans: What It Means for the Retirement Industry

The DOL’s newly released final regulation on “Association Retirement Plans” (ARPs) will make it e...

Read More >