X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Connecticut Commission on Human Rights and Opportunities Issues Guidance on Sexual Harassment Training and Notice Requirements

As we previously reported, Connecticut has enacted the Time’s Up Act (the “Act”), which expanded ...

Read More >

Hidden Costs Of An OSHA Citation

Congress surprised employers when it increased Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) ...

Read More >

Western European PE activity dips in 2019, but total buyout value remains high

PE activity in Western Europe may have dipped in 2019 but this is not the full picture. Buyout activ...

Read More >

Unconscious Bias in the Retail World

Last week, in our highlights of the 49th ICSC U.S. Law Conference, we touched on Dr. Mahzarin R. Ban...

Read More >

QOZ Final Rules Part III: Additional Clarity for QOF and QOZ Business Qualifications

In this third installment of our series, we will discuss the new details provided to taxpayers regar...

Read More >

Construction with COVID-19: Could you need a contractual reset?

The new normal for construction is a large lurch, and lowered productivity will be unavoidable. New...

Read More >