X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

When are damages based on unjust enrichment appropriate?

Ohio courts have long been in agreement that “[i]t is clearly the law in Ohio that an equitable act...

Read More >

Defying gravity: US M&A H1 2019: Three key M&A decisions from Delaware courts

The first half of 2019 saw several decisions from the Delaware courts that will affect M&A dealmakin...

Read More >

Financial institutions M&A: Sector trends - February 2020: Asset/Wealth Management

Financial institutions M&A sector trends: asset/wealth management — H2 2019 and outlook for 2020 - ...

Read More >

Statutory Planning Act meetings during COVID-19

On April 17, the Ontario Ombudsman released a ruling on electronic meetings, which may be instructiv...

Read More >

Final CFIUS Reform Regulations Formally Implemented

On February 13, 2020, long-awaited reform legislation designed to expand the scope of foreign invest...

Read More >

Rocking the boat – Pension Schemes Bill proposals may risk destabilising future restructurings

The Pension Schemes Bill [HL] 2019-20 (Bill) was re-introduced before Parliament on 7 January 2020. ...

Read More >