X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

In California, It’s Time to Revisit Your "Pay-When-Paid" Contract Clause

In California, the "pay-when-paid" contract language typically found in general contractor’s subcon...

Read More >

SECURE Act Passage Now Secure

The world of benefits regulation has seen significant change lately, with the enactment of tax refor...

Read More >

Steel Painters Settles EEOC Disability Discrimination Suit

Industrial Painting Company Unlawfully Fired Worker Because of His Medically Prescribed Methadone, F...

Read More >

A Return to Common Sense in Federal Labor Law

Through a series of decisions issued in late 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or “...

Read More >

And We’re Back! (Sort of): Regulatory Compliance for Resuming Construction Work in PA on May 1

The construction industry can resume operations statewide starting May 1, 2020 under recent orders f...

Read More >

Ohio Supreme Court Crushes "Fannie Lewis Law" in Cleveland - Reverses Court of Appeals in Hot Debate

Ohio local hiring laws affecting contractors are destroyed, for now. Municipalities will no longer ...

Read More >