X
09Jul

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespoke provisions of their acquisition agreements. This phenomenon is particularly prone to occur with “no third party beneficiary” clauses, classic and...
By: Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/standard-versus-bespoke-boilerplate-a-27071/

Related

Crowdworkers Are Not Employees Under German Employment Law

In one of its latest rulings, the Regional Labor Court of Munich concluded that crowdworkers or micr...

Read More >

Short-term Hiccup or Significant Long-term Effect? Material Adverse Effect Clauses and the COVID-19 Pandemic

Parties to merger, acquisition, and financing agreements may be considering whether the COVID-19 pan...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Denmark - Q3 2019

It is the assessment of the legislators that the injury concept had become too narrow in practice, s...

Read More >

New ESG Requirements Impacting the Financial Services Industry

In March 2021, a new European Union regime on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial se...

Read More >

NIOSH Will Request Information on Engineered Nanomaterials to Evaluate in Developing OELs

The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) is scheduled to publish a Federal ...

Read More >

[Video] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program - Financial review of your business venture partner

One area not usually considered around your business ventures is the financial health of JV partner,...

Read More >