X
02Jul

Employer Name Error Doesn’t End Plaintiff’s ADEA Action

An employee’s error with regard to the name of his employer when he filed a charge of discrimination was not fatal to his age discrimination claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit held....
By: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/employer-name-error-doesn-t-end-91938/

Related

Making Sense of Your Retiree Health "Savings" Plan

Several municipal clients adopted retiree health savings plans or post-employment health plans, and ...

Read More >

New Rules Expand CFIUS Jurisdiction Over Foreign Investment in U.S. Businesses and Real Estate

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is an interagency committee that re...

Read More >

'Common Law Common Sense' delay analysis

In White Constructions Pty Ltd v PBS Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1166 the Supreme Court of New Sou...

Read More >

Changes to Minnesota Laws Affecting Construction

In the 2019 session, the Minnesota Legislature introduced a number of sweeping changes to statutes a...

Read More >

COVID-19: will State measures give rise to a new set of investment claims?

Governments around the world have responded to the COVID-19 pandemic with drastic, and at times dive...

Read More >

[Podcast]: U.K. Law for U.S. Employers

In this episode of The Proskauer Brief, New York partner Howard Robbins and London partner Dan Ornst...

Read More >