X
02Jul

Employer Name Error Doesn’t End Plaintiff’s ADEA Action

An employee’s error with regard to the name of his employer when he filed a charge of discrimination was not fatal to his age discrimination claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit held....
By: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/employer-name-error-doesn-t-end-91938/

Related

DOL Issues Fluctuating Workweek Proposal Permitting Employers to Include Bonus Pay When Calculating Overtime

On November 4, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced its notice of proposed rulemaking ...

Read More >

Philadelphia Zoning, Land Use, and Construction COVID-19 Update

The Ballard Spahr Zoning and Land Use Team is continuing to monitor all aspects of the Philadelphia ...

Read More >

California Environmental Law & Policy Update - February 2020

Governor Newsom proposes new plan for San Joaquin River Delta - Governor Gavin Newsom revealed a n...

Read More >

The Rosenbaum Law Firm Review - December 2019

How You Should Deal With Missing Plan Participants. What you need to do. Being a 401(k) plan spons...

Read More >

Accept No Imitations: Contractor Cannot Recover For Claim Based On Brand Name Products

When a contractor delivers goods to the government that do not conform to the precise requirements o...

Read More >

Shifting the Risks of Employer’s Economic Loss Resulting from Employee Injury: Keyperson Insurance in New Mexico

What’s a New Mexico business to do if one of its key employees is absent from work due to a non-wor...

Read More >