X
02Jul

Employer Name Error Doesn’t End Plaintiff’s ADEA Action

An employee’s error with regard to the name of his employer when he filed a charge of discrimination was not fatal to his age discrimination claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit held....
By: Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/employer-name-error-doesn-t-end-91938/

Related

The Sword Of Damocles Hangs Over Miller Act Sureties And Brokers: Scollick Case Stayed Sixty Days For Mediation, But Outcome Remains Uncertain

On August 6, 2014, plaintiff-relator Andrew Scollick filed a complaint in the United States District...

Read More >

Rules Finalized Permitting Employees to Buy Individual Health Insurance Plans through HRAs

On June 13, 2019, the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Labor and the Treasury issued f...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 134-Compliance Responses to El Paso and Dayton

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...

Read More >

US DOJ and FTC Issue Vertical Merger Guidelines

The U.S. Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission on June 30, 2020, published in final fo...

Read More >

Global Antitrust Tracker Maps: How is COVID-19 impacting antitrust enforcement, merger control and state aid?

BCLP’s global Antitrust & Competition team have been tracking the various ways COVID-19 is impactin...

Read More >

“Reasonableness” Is in the Eye of the Beholder: Vague Contracts Clauses Invite Litigation

Schick, the shaving product company, recently announced it was abandoning its proposed $1.4 billion ...

Read More >