02Jul
District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”
Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
In recognition of the 20th anniversary of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's (EEOC) media...
Read More >
"Stock Purchase” • Pre-closing tax basis in assets is carried over; no step-up in tax basis. Reve...
Read More >
Although cannabis remains illegal under federal law, the legalization of cannabis on the state-level...
Read More >
Today, in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that time spent by non-exempt em...
Read More >
On June 30, 2020, the Department of Justice and a divided Federal Trade Commission finalized new Ver...
Read More >
Congress is poised to overturn two recent judicial interpretations of the whistleblower protections ...
Read More >