02Jul
District Court Judge Rejects M&A Mootness Fee Settlement As A “Racket” That “Must End”
Seyfarth Synopsis: Following Delaware’s lead in Trulia, an Illinois District Court judge refused to approve a mootness fee settlement as “worthless to the shareholders.” The judge noted that such settlements amounted to a plaintiffs’ bar “racket”...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Employers in the Golden State are well aware that last year in Dynamex v. Superior Court the Califor...
Read More >
As the coronavirus (COVID-19) spreads to countries around the world, employers are developing polici...
Read More >
Companies must mitigate risks to antitrust privilege posed by cross-border megadeals and increased r...
Read More >
On Dec. 13, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) released a series of new regulations int...
Read More >
For the first time since China’s Anti-Monopoly Law (AML) came into force in 2008, the government is...
Read More >
For your Labor Day Weekend enjoyment. Misclassifying workers does not violate the NLRA. The Nationa...
Read More >