05Mar
Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By:
Verrill
Related
The Western Australian government has sought industry comment on a suite of significant proposed ref...
Read More >
On December 16, 2019, the National Minimum Wage Commission (“CONASAMI” for its acronym in Spanish)...
Read More >
Complex construction projects have many moving parts and numerous stakeholders. Each project often ...
Read More >
On 28 August 2019 investment advisor Third Point LLC (Third Point) and three funds under its control...
Read More >
A recent opinion issued by a trial court in New York, Rad and D’Aprile, Inc. v. Arnell Construction...
Read More >
Providing an up-to-date report card on boardroom gender diversity in California’s largest publicly ...
Read More >