X
05Mar

Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits

Verrill | | Return|
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By: Verrill
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-written-disclosures-not-70159/

Related

[Video] Why Culture Matters-Episode 5, How is ethical culture a part of an overall ethics and compliance assessment?

Welcome to this special five-part podcast series with Jay Rosen, VP of Business Development for Affi...

Read More >

Loss of Earning Capacity Versus Functional Impairment for Compensating Unscheduled (Body as a Whole) Work Injuries under the 2017 Amendments

A workers’ compensation arbitration decision was recently filed in what appears to be the first tim...

Read More >

Is Obesity an ADA-Covered Disability? Courts in Conflict

There is debate among employers as to whether or not being morbidly obese is considered an ADA-cover...

Read More >

At risk of oversharing: considerations for mobile network sharing agreements in the 5G era

On 6 March 2020, the European Commission (Commission) cleared the acquisition of joint control over ...

Read More >

Massachusetts Paid Family and Medical Leave (“MAPFML”) Overview

Although employees won’t be able to receive the benefits of the new Massachusetts Paid Family and M...

Read More >

We Need to Preserve and Protect Whistleblowing in This Time of Challenge

Many compliance officers over the years have wished for the day when what we do is at the forefront ...

Read More >