X
05Mar

Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits

Verrill | | Return|
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By: Verrill
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-written-disclosures-not-70159/

Related

New York State Lawmakers Overhaul Pay Equity Laws in Final Days of Legislative Session

New York state lawmakers were busy during the final days of the legislative session, introducing and...

Read More >

New York State Bans Discrimination Based on Reproductive Health Decision Making

As of November 8, 2019, New York State prohibits employment discrimination based on an employee’s o...

Read More >

A New Look At The Doctor Deposition

In the context of the practice of medicine, we are all very familiar with the Latin phrase primum es...

Read More >

Delaware Court Addresses Meaning of “Affiliate”

In PWP Xerion Holdings III LLC v Red Leaf Resources, Inc. discussed disputed consent rights in conne...

Read More >

Employer Survival Kit: Coronavirus Edition

With the arrival of 2019 novel coronavirus (“COVID-19”) to the United States, employers should beg...

Read More >

What the Loss of Spousal Employment Authorizations Could Mean for You

Legal challenges threaten to take the right to gain employment in the U.S. away from H-4 visa holder...

Read More >