X
05Mar

Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits

Verrill | | Return|
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By: Verrill
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-written-disclosures-not-70159/

Related

New York State Enacts Law to Protect Employees’ Reproductive Health Decisions

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo has signed into law a bill which, effective immediately, prohibits em...

Read More >

Overview of the amended voluntary delisting regime in Singapore

In this article, we give a broad overview of the changes to the delisting regime implemented by Sing...

Read More >

Minimising and Mitigating Risk in M&A - Trusted Tools and New Solutions

In a complex and competitive market, minimising and mitigating risk in M&A is a key concern for deal...

Read More >

AB 51 Update: Court Continues TRO on California’s Arbitration Statute

Assembly Bill (AB) 51, which attempts to ban certain mandatory arbitration agreements, was scheduled...

Read More >

[Video] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 66 – Wink of an Eye

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode Wink of an Eye which aired o...

Read More >

Changes to the Foreign Investment Review Board

Statutory body: Foreign Investment Review Board Website: www.firb.gov.au Australia’s Foreign Invest...

Read More >