05Mar
Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By:
Verrill
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: Employers were handed a big win recently when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
Read More >
Employers will now be responsible for determining the employment status of independent contractors i...
Read More >
The U.K. Competition and Markets Authority has issued the Investment Consultancy and Fiduciary Manag...
Read More >
Women with children are the fastest-growing segment of the workforce. Six in every ten new mothers a...
Read More >
Addressing a matter of first impression, the Iowa Supreme Court determined that “when a civil cause...
Read More >
City of Fort Myers General § Employees’ Pension Fund v Haley, which was commenced in the Delaware C...
Read More >