X
05Mar

Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits

Verrill | | Return|
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By: Verrill
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-written-disclosures-not-70159/

Related

Department Of Justice Issues Latest Merger Remedies Manual, Focusing On Preference For Structural Remedies

On September 3, 2020, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Division”) is...

Read More >

New Jersey Salary History Ban Takes Effect January 1

A reminder to New Jersey employers that the new law prohibiting employers from screening job applica...

Read More >

SECURE Act Brings About Significant Changes to IRAs

As we reach the end of 2019 and prepare to flip the calendar to 2020, Congress and the president hav...

Read More >

Delaware Court Adopts Pillsbury’s Theories on Novel D&O Insurance Issues (Part 2)

Previously, we reported an important ruling of first impression by the Delaware Superior Court that ...

Read More >

Corporate Governance and Securities Law Update: Latin America Edition - May 2020

This newsletter provides a snapshot of the principal U.S. and selected international governance and ...

Read More >

The Contractor’s Coronavirus Checklist

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to dominate global headlines and markets. In the U.S., ...

Read More >