05Mar
Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By:
Verrill
Related
Since first issuing declarations of emergency in early March, the Governors of New York, New Jersey ...
Read More >
On August 8, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor announced that it issued three new opinion letters. ...
Read More >
On July 2, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed a significant victory to Ne...
Read More >
Manti Holdings, LLC v. Authentix Acquisition Co., Inc., C.A. No. 2017-0887 SG (Del. Ch. Aug 14, 2019...
Read More >
On 5 June 2020, the Treasurer of Australia announced reforms to Australia's foreign investment frame...
Read More >
In a recent summary order in an ERISA LTD benefits case, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals rejecte...
Read More >