X
05Mar

Supreme Court: written disclosures not enough to show actual knowledge in ERISA suits

Verrill | | Return|
The United States Supreme Court unanimously decided last week that a plan participant who received written disclosures about the plan’s investments, but does not remember reading them, does not necessarily have “actual knowledge” of the content of...
By: Verrill
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-written-disclosures-not-70159/

Related

3rd Circuit Upholds Ex-Bank Employee’s Right to Avoid Arbitration of Sarbanes-Oxley Claim for Retaliatory Termination

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals recently issued an opinion upholding the right of a former bank e...

Read More >

California Employment Legislation Update: What's New for 2020

The new year will bring significant changes for California employers, which could have substantial r...

Read More >

Gator in Your Basement? Nope, That’s Just the NLRB Sharpening Its Joint Employer Test

“Be careful as you go down the stairs, officer. An alligator lives in my basement.” Police in Madi...

Read More >

Frequently asked questions on the impact of COVID-19 on NEC4 contracts

Contractors in the UK construction industry have been reviewing their contracts to consider what pro...

Read More >

The NLRB Issues Final Rule on Joint Employment

- On February 26, 2020, the NLRB issued a final rule tightening the standard for joint employment un...

Read More >

Corporate Deposition — Multiple Witnesses At the Same Time?

A few years ago, I represented a process piping subcontractor in a claim against the general contrac...

Read More >