03Mar
Supreme Court’s Sulyma Ruling Toughens ERISA’s “Actual Knowledge” Standard & Makes Dismissal of Fiduciary Breach Actions More Unlikely
Seyfarth Synopsis: On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court unanimously affirmed the Ninth Circuit’s ruling in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee, et al. v. Sulyma. 589 U.S. ___ (2020), holding that plan participants must read plan disclosures to...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Sweeping changes to corporate whistleblowing laws in Australia came into effect on 1 July 2019. The ...
Read More >
The fascinating part of ERISA litigations is the changing law and viewpoints. To combat the rising t...
Read More >
In-house attorneys often wear multiple hats when performing work for private companies. Some of thei...
Read More >
In Peters v. WCAB (Cintas Corp), No. 1835 C.D. 2017, the Commonwealth Court was tasked with deciding...
Read More >
In the first reported case regarding minority oppression in the context of a South Carolina limited ...
Read More >
The recent rise to prominence of SPACs provides private equity portfolio companies an alternative me...
Read More >