X
28Feb

Supreme Court Decides Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual knowledge” of a breach of...
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decides-intel-corporation-61515/

Related

COVID-19: Employment Issues in Health Care Mergers & Acquisitions in the Era of COVID-19

Mergers and acquisitions in the healthcare industry have been on the upswing in recent years, and ev...

Read More >

Fifth Circuit Rules that Courts, Not Arbitrators, Decide “Gateway Issue” of Class Arbitrability

In 20/20 Communications, Inc. v. Crawford, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit recently ...

Read More >

CFIUS Annual Report for 2019 Shows Key Trends; TikTok Faces CFIUS Review and, Together with WeChat, Other US Restrictions

In late July, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) released its Annual R...

Read More >

Foreign Investment Controls - Are We Seeing a More Nuanced Approach to Private Equity?

Amid FDI screening regime expansion, deal teams have opportunities to capitalise on newly available ...

Read More >

A Little Less Conversation, a Little More Action: Major Retirement Plan Legislation Is Finally Signed Into Law

After being on the verge of enactment last spring but failing to pass, the SECURE Act will become la...

Read More >

Franchisors are “Lovin’ It”

In a win for franchisors, the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the district court’s summary judgment...

Read More >