X
28Feb

Supreme Court Decides Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual knowledge” of a breach of...
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decides-intel-corporation-61515/

Related

Independent Contractors Redux: Fifth Circuit Returns to Oil Patch to Address Independent Contractor Status Under the Fair Labor Standards Act

Overtime Pay in the Oil Patch - The boom for domestic energy producers, particularly in the Permia...

Read More >

Properly Evaluating an OSHA Citation: Should You Contest the Citation?

For the last thirty years, I have defended companies in OSHA enforcement actions. No matter how larg...

Read More >

In the Weeds: Medical Marijuana Protections Continue to Expand in New Jersey

Continuing on a recent trend in New Jersey, employees who use medical marijuana received another lay...

Read More >

Remand Directing Change in Standard of Judicial Review Is Not Sufficient Success on the Merits to Support Attorneys’ Fee Award

In Ariana M. v. Humana Health Plan of Texas, Inc., No. 18-20700, 2019 WL 5866677 (5th Cir. Nov. 8, 2...

Read More >

Is Mandatory Individual Arbitration Another Tool for the Plan Design Toolbox?

Recent decisions by the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit have reinvigorated the debate over...

Read More >