28Feb
Supreme Court Decides Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma
On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual knowledge” of a breach of...
By:
Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Related
In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. GOP chair of SEC voted against penalizing Wells Fa...
Read More >
Longwood Restaurant Failed to Hire Applicant Because of His Beard, Federal Agency Charges in Lawsuit...
Read More >
For the past 7 years, fee disclosure has certainly helped you as a plan sponsor to finally understan...
Read More >
In this five-part podcast series, I consider the use of monitors by state Attorneys General. I am jo...
Read More >
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, No. 2018-0517-KSJM, 2019 WL 2290916 (...
Read More >
Under Indiana law, courts have routinely employed the "blue pencil doctrine" to revise noncompetitio...
Read More >