X
28Feb

Supreme Court Decides Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma

On February 26, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, holding that, for purposes of ERISA’s three-year statute of limitations, a plan beneficiary does not have “actual knowledge” of a breach of...
By: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/supreme-court-decides-intel-corporation-61515/

Related

Hospital Settles Claim Of Religious Discrimination Based On Applicant’s Refusal Of Flu Vaccine

The EEOC announced that it reached a $74,418 settlement with a hospital in Owosso, Michigan, to sett...

Read More >

California Court of Appeal Finds Restaurant Did Not Need to Reimburse Staff for Wearing Required Slip-Resistant Shoes

In Townley v. BJ’s Restaurants, Inc., a California Court of Appeal ruled that California’s busines...

Read More >

New York Harassment Law - A New Frontier?

On June 18, 2019, the New York legislature passed a bill that makes significant changes to the long-...

Read More >

SCOTUS Refuses to Review Ninth Circuit Ruling on ACA Birth Control Rules

The US Supreme Court declined to review a recent Ninth Circuit decision, blocking the interim rules ...

Read More >

Pending Merger Required to be Considered in Valuing Stock

In Chief Counsel Advice, the IRS concluded that in valuing a gift of publicly traded stock to a gran...

Read More >

Project Suspended or Payment Delays? Don’t Lose Your Mechanic’s Lien Rights!

While many construction projects are advancing in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic, some h...

Read More >