24Dec
Fairstone Financial v Duo Bank – Ontario Court Interprets MAC Clause
In Fairstone Financial Holdings Inc v Duo Bank of Canada, Koehnen J. of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (Commercial List) had the opportunity to further the limited jurisprudence on material adverse change/material adverse effect (MAE) clauses. Unsurprisingly, this jurisprudence has become more prominent as a result of the suddenness and uncertainty of the COVID-19 pandemic. In this decision, Koehnen J. considered the applicability of an MAE clause and other covenants in a share purchase...
By:
Bennett Jones LLP
Related
A recently passed Florida law, Florida Statutes 542.336 seeks to prevent medical providers from usin...
Read More >
Blackstone has announced that it will acquire HealthEdge. HealthEdge, based in Burlington, Mass., i...
Read More >
On June 13, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed a preliminary injunction...
Read More >
Impact of Brexit on Competition matters - On 31 January 2020, the United Kingdom ("UK") ceased to ...
Read More >
The Seventh Circuit joins the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits in holding that such a refusal would ...
Read More >
As a plan provider, it makes sense to create an ancillary line of business if it’s a natural carryo...
Read More >