X
17Jan

The Relevance Of The Spearin Doctrine In An Increasingly Design-Build World

Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918), virtually all construction risk was borne by the contractor, except for (i) express carve-outs set forth in a contract or (ii) performance rendered...
By: Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-relevance-of-the-spearin-doctrine-47104/

Related

Are Non-Compete Provisions Enforceable in Arizona?

A non-compete agreement, which is often referred to as a “restrictive covenant,” attempts to precl...

Read More >

The Contractor’s Coronavirus Checklist

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) continues to dominate global headlines and markets. In the U.S., ...

Read More >

U.S. Supreme Court To Decide Whether ‘Ministerial Exception’ Covers Catholic School Teachers

The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review two consolidated cases that will afford it an opportunit...

Read More >

Hart-Scott-Rodino Annual Increases Announced; New Thresholds To Go Into Effect In Late February

On January 27, 2020, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission ("FTC") announced in the Federal Register tha...

Read More >

Major Changes to IR35

In April 2020, major changes will be made to the off-payroll working rules (commonly known as “IR35...

Read More >

Wage Advance Products Draw First Consumer Class Action Lawsuits

The legal uncertainties that surround wage advance products continue to boil and bubble. We’ve prev...

Read More >