X
Archive by tag: LLPReturn

Ohio Supreme Court to consider whether direct observation method of employee drug-testing is an invasion of privacy

Under current Ohio law, requiring an employee to submit a urine sample for drug testing does not violate the employee’s right of privacy. However, on January 28, 2020, the Ohio Supreme Court will hear oral argument regarding whether a certain method...By: Bricker & Eckler LLP
Read More
Bricker & Eckler LLP | Jan 28,2020 |

New Jersey Strengthens Enforcement Tools to Crack Down on Independent Contractor Misclassification

Seyfarth Synopsis: Governor Murphy signed 153 bills into law on January 20, 2020, including six (6) that increase enforcement mechanisms for state agencies to impose certain penalties against employers who misclassify workers as independent...By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Read More
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | Jan 28,2020 |

Texas Federal Court Upholds Professional Services Exclusion to Preclude Duty to Defend

In Project Surveillance, Inc. v. The Travelers Indemnity Company, No. 4:19-CV-03324, 2020 WL 292247 (S.D. Tex. Jan. 21, 2020), a Texas federal court held that a professional services exclusion in a commercial general liability policy precluded...By: Traub Lieberman Straus & Shrewsberry LLP
Read More

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act’s Impact on Cross-Border Transactions

Two years after the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), the most significant tax reform enacted in a generation, taxpayers continue to encounter substantial uncertainty arising from interpretations of new statutory provisions, reinforcing...By: Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Read More

Can You Fire an Employee Who Refuses To Travel for Business to a Coronavirus “Hot Spot”?

Last week, I covered some of the basics to think about as the coronavirus continues to spread. Jon Hyman has a post today about whether the ADA might apply to the situation. But in Connecticut, there’s another case that employers ought to be...By: Shipman & Goodwin LLP
Read More
Shipman & Goodwin LLP | Jan 27,2020 |

Department of Labor Issues Final Rule on Joint Employer Status

The term “joint employer” is often one of grave concern to employers. When, for example, Company A hires Company B, an outside cleaning service, to clean Company A’s offices, both companies may be held by a court or administrative agency to be a...By: White and Williams LLP
Read More
White and Williams LLP | Jan 27,2020 |

Employment Law Consequences of the UK General Election

The general election in the United Kingdom took place on December 12, 2019, and resulted in a landslide majority of 80 seats for Boris Johnson and the Conservative Party. The principal consequence of the election is that, three years after the...By: Locke Lord LLP
Read More
Locke Lord LLP | Jan 27,2020 |

Year in Review: Notable 2019 Decisions Impacting Arbitration Agreements

2019 saw courts issue several significant decisions that have implications for employers nationwide who rely on arbitration agreements with their workforce. The nation’s highest court decided a trio of cases in the first quarter involving the...By: Locke Lord LLP
Read More
Locke Lord LLP | Jan 27,2020 |

Status of Sick Leave Ordinances in Texas Cities

The City of Dallas Earned Paid Sick Time Ordinance (the “Dallas Ordinance”) went into effect on August 1, 2019 for employers with six (6) or more employees. To allow employers time to become compliant with the Dallas Ordinance, the City of Dallas...By: Locke Lord LLP
Read More
Locke Lord LLP | Jan 27,2020 |

MSHA Increases Civil Penalties for 2020

Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL has published its 2020 increases to MSHA civil penalties. The DOL has finalized the 2020 inflation adjustments, which will nudge the penalties up 1.764%.  85 Fed. Reg. 2292 (Jan. 15, 2020)....By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Read More
Seyfarth Shaw LLP | Jan 27,2020 |
Page 217 of 484 [217]