05Feb
Federal Court Allows ADEA Disparate Impact Claims over Employer Policies to Proceed
Ever since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, plaintiff employment lawyers have struggled with how best to assert a viable claim of disparate impact age discrimination. The concept of disparate impact discrimination was...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Related
The U.S. Department of Labor (the “DOL”) has issued a final rule to expand worker eligibility for ...
Read More >
Under Arizona law, when a purchaser of a new residential dwelling unit alleges a construction defect...
Read More >
As we wrote here in September 27, the new “white collar” salary thresholds under the federal Fair ...
Read More >
In White Constructions Pty Ltd v PBS Holdings Pty Ltd [2019] NSWSC 1166 the Supreme Court of New Sou...
Read More >
Employers cannot afford to ignore the direct impact of the 2019 amendments to the law permitting leg...
Read More >
New York State has issued detailed guidance on Governor Cuomo’s “New York Forward” Plan, under wh...
Read More >