X
05Feb

Federal Court Allows ADEA Disparate Impact Claims over Employer Policies to Proceed

Ever since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, plaintiff employment lawyers have struggled with how best to assert a viable claim of disparate impact age discrimination. The concept of disparate impact discrimination was...
By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-court-allows-adea-disparate-15793/

Related

Should You Use Integrated Project Delivery on Your Next Construction Project?

Complex construction projects have many moving parts and numerous stakeholders.  Each project often ...

Read More >

[Podcast]: New York State Enacts Law Prohibiting Hairstyle Discrimination

In this episode of The Proskauer Brief, partner Evandro Gigante and associate Laura Fant discuss the...

Read More >

ECB Seeks EU Banking M&A With New Supervisory Guide

The Guide is intended to provide fresh clarity on the ECB’s approach to assessing proposed M&A tran...

Read More >

Judge Refuses To Dismiss Domino’s Collective Action Without Seeing Settlement Agreement

On May 17, 2019, Judge Renee Marie Bumb of the United States District Court for the District of New ...

Read More >

The 2019 Honig Act Means New Obligations for New Jersey Employers Around Cannabis at Work

Employers cannot afford to ignore the direct impact of the 2019 amendments to the law permitting leg...

Read More >

In a Win for Employers, California Supreme Court Limits Reach of PAGA

On September 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court decided ZB N.A. v. Superior Court and issued a r...

Read More >