X
05Feb

Federal Court Allows ADEA Disparate Impact Claims over Employer Policies to Proceed

Ever since the Supreme Court's 2005 decision in Smith v. City of Jackson, plaintiff employment lawyers have struggled with how best to assert a viable claim of disparate impact age discrimination. The concept of disparate impact discrimination was...
By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/federal-court-allows-adea-disparate-15793/

Related

Non-Union Members Denied Fair-Share Fee Refunds After Janus

Earlier this month, the Seventh Circuit joined the consensus across the country, concluding in two s...

Read More >

Sun Capital Prevails in Long-Running ERISA Liability Dispute, But Pension Risks Remain for Private Equity Funds

Eleven years after its portfolio company’s bankruptcy triggered a multiemployer pension plan’s dem...

Read More >

Labor & Employment E-Note - February 2020

With the implementation of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, it was only a matter of time before th...

Read More >

DOE Finalizes Revisions to Part 708 – Contractor Employee Protection Program

The US Department of Energy (DOE) published a final rule in the August 2 Federal Register that revis...

Read More >

[Video] Innovation in Compliance- The Mindset of Culture with Arnie Malham

When you think about personal injury lawyers, is the first thing that comes to mind “what great adv...

Read More >

Delaware Court of Chancery Strictly Construes Shareholder Representative Provision, Complicating Discovery from Shareholders

Following a recent Delaware case, buyers in M&A deals should ensure that their purchase agreements a...

Read More >