X
30May

The NY Court of Appeals Addresses “Optional Safety Equipment” in Fasolas v. Bobcat of N.Y., Inc.

Wilson Elser | | Return|
In products liability litigation, the question of whether a product was defectively designed because the manufacturer decided to make certain safety equipment “optional” instead of “standard” is an issue that arises often in cases involving heavy...
By: Wilson Elser
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-ny-court-of-appeals-addresses-39099/

Related

Boost Thy Stock

Singapore’s initial public offering market is starting to rebound from its 2018 performance as init...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Italy - Q4 2019

Reserve Quotas for Disabled Employees and Mass Dismissals - Precedential Decision by Judiciary or R...

Read More >

Does Pennsylvania Recognize Strict Liability Claims Against Medical Device Manufacturers? A Pennsylvania federal court calls the question.

For at least two decades, Pennsylvania law has recognized an exemption from strict liability for pre...

Read More >

Misclassifying Workers as Independent Contractors Does Not Violate NLRA

A lot of times, determining whether a worker is an independent contractor or an employee is tough.  ...

Read More >

Pennsylvania Law Passed Requiring Mandatory Use of E-Verify in the Construction Industry

Pennsylvania House Bill 1170, known as the Construction Industry Employee Verification Act (the Act)...

Read More >

SBA Issues PPP Loan Guidance Regarding M&A Transactions

The U.S. Small Business Association (the “SBA”) released on October 2, 2020 a Procedural Notice pr...

Read More >