X
30May

The NY Court of Appeals Addresses “Optional Safety Equipment” in Fasolas v. Bobcat of N.Y., Inc.

Wilson Elser | | Return|
In products liability litigation, the question of whether a product was defectively designed because the manufacturer decided to make certain safety equipment “optional” instead of “standard” is an issue that arises often in cases involving heavy...
By: Wilson Elser
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-ny-court-of-appeals-addresses-39099/

Related

Recent Delaware Cases Illustrating How Uncapped Fraud Claims Can and Cannot Be Premised Upon Written Representations

In Delaware, a robust and properly placed disclaimer of reliance clause can effectively eliminate cl...

Read More >

Newest I-9 Form “Update” Includes a Reminder of Responsibility

At the end of January the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule establishing ...

Read More >

UK: What constitutes a protected philosophical belief?

At the end of 2019, courts in the UK decided that ethical veganism is a protected philosophical beli...

Read More >

Force Majeure In Construction’s New World Of COVID-19

The government and market response to the COVID-19 pandemic is presenting novel and difficult legal ...

Read More >

[Event] Tech – Exposed in a downturn? - November 11th, London, UK

Tech has been transformed in the last decade. Does value invested in the cloud, big data and algorit...

Read More >

DC Seeks to Expand Condo Warranty Liability

The DC City Council has proposed two bills intended to make it easier for condominium associations a...

Read More >