30May
The NY Court of Appeals Addresses “Optional Safety Equipment” in Fasolas v. Bobcat of N.Y., Inc.
In products liability litigation, the question of whether a product was defectively designed because the manufacturer decided to make certain safety equipment “optional” instead of “standard” is an issue that arises often in cases involving heavy...
By:
Wilson Elser
Related
In 2011, in Specialty Healthcare & Rehabilitation Center of Mobile, an Obama-era majority of the Nat...
Read More >
2019 Update: In 2018, PETERKA & PARTNERS drafted the following chapter on what Slovakian companies n...
Read More >
Have you ever wondered when Massachusetts’ 6-year statute of repose for defective design, planning ...
Read More >
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced—for the first time since 2010—a ...
Read More >
The U.S. Department of Labor issued its bi-annual regulatory agenda update on November 20, 2019. Of...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission's Premerger Notification Office (PNO) announced that, effective Monday,...
Read More >