X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

[Webinar] SECURE Act: What Plan Sponsors Need to Know - February 18th, 11:00 am ET

The SECURE Act* makes significant changes to employer-sponsored retirement plans and many of the cha...

Read More >

Entertainment Benefits Group Settles Two EEOC Lawsuits for $925,000

Travel and Entertainment Provider Failed to Address EEO Complaints, Federal Agency Charges - LAS V...

Read More >

Major League Baseball Umpire Strikes Out in His Assertion of Union Privilege in Discrimination Claim

A Federal District Court in New York recently fielded the issue of whether there is such a thing as ...

Read More >

That’s Final: Department of Labor Issues Final Rule Increasing Salary Thresholds for Exempt Employees, including Highly Compensated Employees

On Sept. 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) unveiled its final rule to update the Fair Lab...

Read More >

IRS Determined a Subsidiary Stock Sale Does Not Make Prior Capitalized Transaction Costs Deductible

A recent Technical Advice Memorandum (TAM) issued by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) National Off...

Read More >

GMAC Urges Lawmakers to Ease Up on H-1B Restrictions

The Graduate Management Admission Council or GMAC has sent a letter to governmental leaders calling ...

Read More >