X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

California Supreme Court Throws the Barn Doors Open, Finding That Groundwater Well Permits Aren’t Necessarily Ministerial

On August 27, 2020, in Protecting Our Water and Environmental Resources v. County of Stanislaus, Cas...

Read More >

New York City To Prohibit Retaliation For Requesting Reasonable Accommodation

On June 13, 2019, the New York City Council passed Intro 799 to prohibit retaliation against individ...

Read More >

Contractors in the UK - Important Tax Changes from April 2020

We are now less than two months away from the new IR35 regime: important changes to the way companie...

Read More >

Hat World to Pay $33,000 to Settle EEOC Retaliation Lawsuit

Lids' Retailer Fired Store Manager Who Reported Sexual Harassment and Filed a Charge with the EEOC, ...

Read More >

California Prohibits Most “No Rehire” Provisions in Settlement Agreements

Employment litigation settlement agreements often include a mutually negotiated “no-rehire” provis...

Read More >

Foreign direct investment reviews 2020: A global perspective - Sweden

Increased awareness of safety concerns related to foreign direct investments has prompted a ramp-up ...

Read More >