X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Can An Employer Refuse To Hire An Employee Because Of The Employee’s Risk Of Developing A Disability?

The Seventh Circuit joins the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits in holding that such a refusal would ...

Read More >

Talking Point: Insolvency risk in the construction industry

In the difficult market conditions which have accompanied the COVID-19 pandemic, the financial healt...

Read More >

Third-Party Sexual Harassment: What Arizona Employees and Employers Need to Know

The #Metoo movement has shed substantial light upon issues surrounding workplace sexual harassment, ...

Read More >

Big ERISA Decisions on the Horizon—SCOTUS to Review Third ERISA Case this Term

The US Supreme Court recently agreed to review the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Thole v. US Bank, i...

Read More >

DHS Finalizes H-1B Cap Registration Fee

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security published a final rule that will require employers to pay a...

Read More >

[Audio] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program - Day 28 | Pre-acquisition due diligence in M&A

A company that does not perform adequate due diligence prior to a merger or acquisition may face bot...

Read More >