X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

The Heart of Employee Rights Under CCPA: Attorney General Modifies Guidance

Transparency and communication are cornerstones of a successful relationship—and the employment rel...

Read More >

Working Wise - Volume 2

A monthly snapshot of U.S. labor and employment law developments, and why they matter. 1. A LAW WIT...

Read More >

DOJ’s Revised Compliance Guidance: The Refocus of Mergers and Acquisitions Risks and Mitigation (Part I of II)

The Justice Department’s recent revisions to the Evaluation of Corporate Compliance Programs highli...

Read More >

Compromise Reached in Maine Workers’ Compensation Reform 

Governor Mills has signed into law amendments to the existing Workers’ Compensation Act that are th...

Read More >

Another Reminder That the UK Merger Control Regime Is More Than Just Voluntary

On 6 August 2019, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (the “CMA”) imposed an ‘Unwinding O...

Read More >

When is suspending an employee a breach of trust and confidence?

Suspension can be a very useful tool for employers. However, in certain circumstances it can amount ...

Read More >