X
06Dec

“Medical Necessity” Isn’t Well-Defined Unless It Is Well-Defined

Littler | | Return|
A U.S. District Court in Connecticut recently issued an order that highlights the importance of understanding exactly what the term “medically necessary” means in an ERISA health plan....
By: Littler
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/medical-necessity-isn-t-well-defined-81026/

Related

Not So Severable After All: Third Circuit Lets Courts Determine Arbitration Agreement Existence When Underlying Contract’s Validity Is Challenged

On September 14, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit addressed the perennially thorny is...

Read More >

USCIS: Form I-9 Remains in Effect After Expiration Date

U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) announced that until further notice employers shou...

Read More >

Increased Regulations for Employers, Among Philadelphia City Council’s Agenda

In advance of their first official meeting of 2020, members of Philadelphia City Council outlined th...

Read More >

The Rosenbaum Law Firm Review - August 2019

Things That 401(k) Plan Sponsors Are Supposed To Do, But Aren't Doing Anyway. So many things they s...

Read More >

COVID-19: UK Public Sector Construction - Cabinet Office publishes FAQs regarding PPN02/20

Further to our recent blog post “COVID-19: UK Public Sector Construction - cash flow relief for sup...

Read More >

Canada: Alberta Court of Appeal Reminds Adjudicators to take a Modern Approach to Sexual Misconduct in the Workplace

Two years after the #MeToo Movement made the prevalence of sexual harassment and sexual assault in t...

Read More >