02Dec
Court Denies Criminal Defendant’s Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained via Warrantless Search: eDiscovery Case Law
In United States v. Caputo, No. 3:18-cr-00428-IM (D. Or Nov. 6, 2019), Oregon District Judge Karin J. Immergut denied the defendant’s motion to suppress emails and evidence derived from a warrantless search of Defendant’s workplace email account,...
By:
CloudNine
Related
In UDOT v. Target Corp. et al., 2020 UT 10, the Utah Supreme Court recently clarified the standard b...
Read More >
In late February as the COVID-19 pandemic was accelerating, the Delaware Chancery Court issued an im...
Read More >
In its recent decision in R. v Secretary of State for Transport, the Court of Appeal ruled that the ...
Read More >
The DE OFCCP Week in Review (WIR) is a simple, fast and direct summary of relevant happenings in the...
Read More >
A Classic Online RPM Case in the UK - On 1 August 2019, the UK Competition and Markets Authority (C...
Read More >
Often, the parties in a business sale will designate a portion of the purchase price to be paid out ...
Read More >