X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Massachusetts Issues Guidance on When Contractors and Other Workers Count Towards the ‘25 Covered Individuals’ Threshold

As we previously reported, the Massachusetts Department of Family and Medical Leave (“DFML”) has b...

Read More >

Health Care M+A: The Emergence of “Supergroups” - Composed of Medical, Dental and Other Clinicians

Among the new models are “supergroups,” involving combinations of physicians, dentists, vision-car...

Read More >

M&A Considerations Regarding CARES Act Loan Programs And Other Relief

In recent weeks Congress has authorized funding for a number of programs intended to provide relief ...

Read More >

Court of Chancery Continues To Rely on Market-Based Metrics in Appraisal Decisions

In recent decisions, the Delaware Court of Chancery continued to follow the Delaware Supreme Court’...

Read More >

It’s a Bird, It’s a Plane, It’s…the SBA? SBA Issues Guidance on Change of Ownership Transactions Involving PPP Loans

Dealmakers know that uncertainty is their proverbial kryptonite. As M&A and investment have started ...

Read More >

Corporate Governance and Securities Law Update: Latin America Edition - February 2020

US DEVELOPMENTS - SEC and NYSE/Nasdaq Developments - SEC Proposes Changes to Accredited Investor...

Read More >