25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5 (A.B. 5). A....
Read More >
The Boston Planning and Development Agency (“BPDA”) has approved an amendment to the Boston Zoning...
Read More >
In September, the U.S. Department of Labor issued a long-awaited final rule updating the compensatio...
Read More >
Partnering with a private equity (PE) investor can help physicians monetize the value of their pract...
Read More >
On 27 June 209, the European Commission (Commission) announced it had fined Japanese camera and prin...
Read More >
Laser Tone Business Systems LLC v. Delaware Micro-Computer LLC, C.A. No. 2017-0439-TMR (Del. Ch. Nov...
Read More >