25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
It is typical in private equity funds for certain tax-sensitive investors, including U.S. tax exempt...
Read More >
To further implement the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act of 2018 (“FIRRMA”), the ...
Read More >
The Department of Treasury’s office that administers reviews of foreign investments in U.S. compani...
Read More >
Flu season is here and that likely means employers can hear sneezing and sniffling up and down the h...
Read More >
On September 3, 2020, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) released a revised Merger Remedies Manual ...
Read More >
The European Central Bank announced on Thursday that is likely to revive the quantitative easing pro...
Read More >