25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
With the growing uncertainty surrounding the economic impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic, buyers may s...
Read More >
With the U.S. Supreme Court recognition of same-sex marriage back in 2015 and increasing EEOC scruti...
Read More >
On December 31, 2019, the First District Illinois Appellate Court issued its decision in Owners Insu...
Read More >
Before practicing law, I had another life. I was a 20-something trying to make my way in Hollywood—...
Read More >
Pillsbury continues to track the impact on construction projects of COVID-19-related orders and guid...
Read More >
What is CFIUS? The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) is an interagency co...
Read More >