X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Littler Global Guide - Finland - Q2 2019

Amendment to Law Simplifies Terminations of Employment Contracts - New Legislation Enacted - On Ju...

Read More >

California Law Provides New Test for Classifying Workers

On September 18, 2019, Governor Newson signed Assembly Bill No. 5 - legislation that changes the law...

Read More >

New Legislation Includes Employee Benefits Changes: Why M&A Practitioners Should ‘CARE’

Financial assistance and other relief provided to employers under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and E...

Read More >

[Video] Daily Compliance News: September 17, 2019- the Tax Returns edition

In today’s edition of Daily Compliance News: 1. What is risk? (Lesson #365,333) (NYT) 2. Internal ...

Read More >

NJ and PA Workers' Compensation Benefits for 2020

Workers’ compensation benefits in New Jersey and Pennsylvania are calculated using a statewide aver...

Read More >

AAA Amends Withdrawal Liability Arbitration Rules to Obtain PBGC Approval

The American Arbitration Association (AAA) significantly altered its rules for multiemployer pension...

Read More >