25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: Set to take effect on January 1, 2020, AB 51 would make it unlawful for employers...
Read More >
After the extension of the March 29 Brexit deadline to October, Western Europe's private equity mark...
Read More >
The FTI Journal’s series looking at opportunities for private equity in distressed M&A in the COVID...
Read More >
In Shah v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25695 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2019), the U....
Read More >
Wells Fargo’s latest CEO, Charles Scharf—the bank’s third chief in the past four years—faced a h...
Read More >
The New York Times recently published an article discussing trends in the area of unlawful age discr...
Read More >