X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Paid Family and Medical Leave Is Coming to Connecticut

Public Act No. 19-25, entitled “An Act Concerning Paid Family and Medical Leave” (“Act”), which ...

Read More >

Swami Pancake, LLC Will Pay $70,000 To Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment Suit

Restaurant Owner and Manager Sexually Harassed Female Employees, Federal Agency Charged - FORT LAU...

Read More >

Massachusetts’ High Court Pumps the Brakes on Equitable Tolling of Restrictive Covenant

For the first time in 15 years, the Supreme Judicial Court (“SJC”), Massachusetts’ highest court,...

Read More >

The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 1: No Rehire Provision is Now a No-No

It's back! Hard to believe another year is coming to a close and the holidays are fast approaching. ...

Read More >

“Standard” Versus “Bespoke” Boilerplate—A Distinction That Can Make a Big Difference

It keeps on happening. Contracting parties allow “standard” boilerplate to potentially trump bespo...

Read More >

CCPA Update: Employee Exemption Bill Amended in Senate Committee 

California legislators are tweaking language in a proposal to exclude employee or job applicant data...

Read More >