25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
In a February 12, 2020 decision, Parker v. EnerNOC, Inc., SJC-12703, the Massachusetts Supreme Judic...
Read More >
This past Thursday, President Donald Trump announced that he would nominate Eugene Scalia to be the ...
Read More >
M&A activity in the retail sector fell sharply during the first half of 2019, as uncertainty and dig...
Read More >
The Creation of the Contract-Generation Measure Introduces New Incentives for Hiring - New Legislat...
Read More >
The outbreak of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) has created a number of questions and complia...
Read More >
Market Trends: What You Need to Know - Over the past several years, an express right, or obligation...
Read More >