X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

[Webinar] Restructuring a portfolio company webinar series: Part 2 – Distressed M&A in the U.S. - May 22nd, 11:00 am - 12:00 pm EDT

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in significant challenges and opportunities for private equity fi...

Read More >

December 2019 Filing and Notice Deadlines for Qualified Retirement and Health and Welfare Plans

Employers and plan sponsors must comply with numerous filing and notice deadlines for their retireme...

Read More >

Utility Workers Announce Apprenticeship Program In The Renewable Energy Sector

On August 6, 2019, the Utility Workers Union of America (UWUA) announced its partnership with The Po...

Read More >

[Video] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 77 – The Savage Curtain

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode The Savage Curtain which air...

Read More >

[Video] 31 Days to a More Effective Compliance Program-Day 17 | Managing your third parties

The building blocks of any compliance program lay the foundations for a best practices compliance pr...

Read More >

ERISA: When Can Plan Administrators Get Into Trouble by Deciding a Disability Claim Too Quickly?

ERISA plan administrators are constantly pressured by claimants to render decisions quickly…. This ...

Read More >