25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
Earlier this month New Jersey enacted the comprehensive Anti-Wage Theft Law (the “Act”), which ame...
Read More >
In light of the coronavirus pandemic, Friday, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and the Antitru...
Read More >
On January 13, the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) published the final ...
Read More >
A number of legislative amendments concerning construction and real estate have been introduced with...
Read More >
When I travel to a stadium or a game, I’m a beer snob and I will walk around to find a beer that is...
Read More >
In Dorman v. Charles Schwab Corp., No. 18-15281 (August 20, 2019), the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeal...
Read More >