X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Court Denies Preliminary Injunction to Enjoin Shinnecock Nation’s Project along Sunrise Highway

Last week, the New York Supreme Court, Suffolk County, denied an application for a preliminary injun...

Read More >

What ‘Yeet’ Can Teach HR Professionals about Evolution

In Spring of this year, I read an article about a “cool” and “savvy” 43-year-old high school tea...

Read More >

Littler Lightbulb: Tips for Handling Workplace Issues Related to the Big Game and Other Madness

As we near two heavily followed sporting events—the Super Bowl and the March Madness NCAA basketbal...

Read More >

DDTC Publishes New FAQs on Defense Services Performed by U.S. Persons Abroad and How to Get Them Approved via GC

• On January 6, 2020, DDTC published a new FAQ on Defense Services Performed by U.S. Persons Abroad...

Read More >

Language in Performance Bond Critical in Determining Surety’s Rights to Complete

If an owner terminates a contractor due to a contractor default on a bonded project, can the surety ...

Read More >

A Return to Work Roadmap for New York Employers

After weeks or months of remote work or closed operations, businesses are understandably eager to re...

Read More >