25Nov
Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By:
Foley Hoag LLP
Related
“Punitive damages pose an acute danger of arbitrary deprivation of property.” –Honda Motor Co. v....
Read More >
On August 29, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) held that misclassifying an employ...
Read More >
Sometimes. The CCPA states that a business should disclose any information that it is required to d...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) recently released its annual National C...
Read More >
I have posted a few times here about using post-employment restrictions to preserve a manufacturer’...
Read More >
Suspension: the basics - In instances of serious misconduct, an employer may in certain circumstan...
Read More >