X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Colorado Becomes 13th State to Pass “Ban the Box” Legislation

On May 28, 2019, Colorado governor Jared Polis signed into law the Colorado Chance to Compete Act (H...

Read More >

New Jersey Closes all Non-Essential Construction Projects

On April 8, 2020, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed Executive Order No. 122, requiring the clos...

Read More >

Top 10 Topics for Directors in 2020: Executive Summary

Election and Impeachment - The presidential race will garner much of the attention during the 2020...

Read More >

NLRB Scales Back "Quickie Election" Rules

On December 13, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB” or the “Board”) issued a propos...

Read More >

Vertical Mergers Receive Increased Attention from Federal and State Antitrust Authorities

Earlier this year, the two federal antitrust agencies—the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the De...

Read More >

What A Difference A Board Makes – Some Hits From the Current NLRB That Are Music To Employer’s Ears

Seyfarth Synopsis: The National Labor Relations Board has been making a lot of noise since the curre...

Read More >