X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Immigration Updates - January 2020

Spending Bill Extends EB-5 Regional Center Program, Includes Immigration Provisions - Congress has ...

Read More >

Corporate and Business Law

This year there were a number of significant legislative changes to the Virginia Stock Corporation A...

Read More >

COVID-19 and the Future of Transportation in California

On July 23, 2020, the California Transportation Foundation convened a panel of transportation profes...

Read More >

California High Court Rules That Employers Must Pay Employees For Exit Searches

Why This Matters - Last week, the California Supreme Court dealt tech giant Apple Inc. a blow when ...

Read More >

New Employee Benefit Rules Expand Health Reimbursement Arrangement Options for Employers

On June 13, 2019, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Department of Labor and Department of Health a...

Read More >

What's The Difference Between Wrongful Death And Survival Actions?

If someone dies as the result of a personal injury, the deceased's estate can bring what is called a...

Read More >