X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

2nd Circuit Decision Paves the Way for Streamlined FLSA Offers of Judgment

In a much-anticipated decision, a federal appeals court just ruled that Fair Labor Standards Act (FL...

Read More >

Washington Supreme Upholds Workweek Averaging for Non-Agricultural Piece-Rate Workers

On September 5, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court held that non-agricultural employees do not have ...

Read More >

PBGC Report Reminds Manufacturers of the Coming Threat

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation released its Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report and, you guesse...

Read More >

Coronavirus: Employer Action Items

Employers are struggling to determine how to respond to the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) outbr...

Read More >

Avalanche of New Laws Create Additional Requirements for Illinois Employers

Illinois employers must be cognizant of new Illinois laws including bans on salary history inquiries...

Read More >

The Department of Labor Proposes to Increase the Salary Level for Overtime Exemption AGAIN

The US Department of Labor (DOL) has announced its proposal to amend its regulations regarding “whi...

Read More >