X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

“Presents” of Mind for the Holidays: Six Q&As on Sensible Workplace Gift Giving

’Tis the season of generosity, random acts of kindness, and selfless gifts. But not all gifts are w...

Read More >

Are You Prepared to Be a Nurse in the US?

International nurses who are interested in becoming eligible for American nursing employment must pa...

Read More >

Know What Drives Juror Perceptions of Medical Device Liability

Medical practitioners know that, for all its wonders, modern medicine is still a matter of chances n...

Read More >

How To Pursue Reps And Warranties Claims

The past decade’s robust mergers and acquisitions volume sparked the rapid growth of representation...

Read More >

Part 1: State of the Cannabis Industry Conference – Keynote Address by Dr. Karen Munkacy and Dan Fireman

As previously blogged last week, Burns & Levinson hosted its third annual State of the Cannabis Indu...

Read More >

Environmental Due Diligence Carries on, With Limitations, During the COVID-19 Pandemic

COVID-19 Resource - Banks, borrowers and their supporting professionals, like everyone else, are ha...

Read More >