X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

Immigrant Workers: Will Trump Give Farmers a Break?

A recent softening of the Trump administration’s stance on undocumented migrant workers may signal ...

Read More >

SEC Streamlines Financial Statements Requirements in Connection with M&A Transactions

On May 21, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments (the “Amen...

Read More >

California Employers Have Another Year To Comply With New Mandatory Sexual Harassment Prevention Training Requirements

Last year, new California legislation effective January 1, 2019 expanded the mandatory sexual harass...

Read More >

SECURE Act: Changes Exclusive to 401(k) Plans

The SECURE Act, included as part of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020, was signed in...

Read More >

CBD Lawsuit Reflects Trucker Termination for THC Tainted Drug Products

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Western District of New York, in Horn v. Medical Marijuana, Inc., et al., iss...

Read More >

Stop the Camera! New Limits on Facial Recognition Technology for Interviews Take Effect in Illinois on January 1, 2020

Illinois’ first-of-its-kind legislation aimed at regulating the use of artificial intelligence in v...

Read More >