X
25Nov

Delaware Chancery Court Rules That Merger Agreement Termination Fee Not Exclusive Remedy Where Seller Accepts Superior Offer in Violation of No-Shop

Foley Hoag LLP | | Return|
In a decision of great interest in the M&A world, the Delaware Chancery Court recently ruled that a termination fee is not the exclusive remedy for a seller that accepts a higher offer in breach of a no-shop provision. Genuine Parts Company v....
By: Foley Hoag LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/delaware-chancery-court-rules-that-78488/

Related

The NLRB Just Made It Harder To Lasso Franchisors And Affiliated Businesses For The Alleged Sins Of Their Compatriots

In 2015, the NLRB adopted a more relaxed standard for determining when an entity could be considered...

Read More >

Planning for and Negotiating Mergers & Acquisitions In Light of COVID-19

Whether your company is at the outset of exploring a potential M&A transaction or in the days leadin...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 1.13.2020 | Top Story: Labor Dept. Issues Stricter Joint Employer Test in New Rules

Sunday’s release of a long-awaited Labor Department final rule on joint employment spells trouble f...

Read More >

In This Case, The "Crux Of The Biscuit" Was The Missing Apostrophe

Consider the following provision of in a contract between a general contractor and a subcontractor.....

Read More >

The Dome Report - 2020 West Virginia Legislature Update: Issue 5

The 2020 Regular Session of the West Virginia Legislature is now entering the final stretch with onl...

Read More >

Developers May be Required to Pay for Off-Tract Mass Transit Upgrades

New Jersey is the nation’s most densely populated state and it has a transit system that can boast ...

Read More >