X
13Nov

ARB: No Protected Activity where Employee Inadvertently Informed Employer and Only “Hinted” at Filing Whistleblower Complaint

Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL’s ARB rejected an employee’s SOX retaliation claim where he inadvertently provided information to his employer and only “hinted” that he was filing a SOX-protected complaint. The ARB seems unwilling to accept retaliation...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/arb-no-protected-activity-where-79236/

Related

Department of Labor Releases New, Narrow “Joint Employer” Rule

Last week, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) released the final version of its new “joint employer...

Read More >

Protecting Government Contractors’ Confidential Information Just Got Easier

At the end of June, the U.S. Supreme Court issued an important Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) dec...

Read More >

Is It Time to Send Your Employees Home?

Once a perk, the ability to work remotely is slowly becoming an expectation. Since 2005, the remote ...

Read More >

NDAs: The EHRC calls for employers to make important changes to their practices with settlement agreements

The Equality and Human Rights Commission has issued guidance on the use of confidentiality provision...

Read More >

Know What Drives Juror Perceptions of Medical Device Liability

Medical practitioners know that, for all its wonders, modern medicine is still a matter of chances n...

Read More >

Material Omissions in Proxy Prevents 'Corwin' Dismissal of Challenge to Merger

Since the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2015 Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings decision, practitioners in...

Read More >