X
13Nov

ARB: No Protected Activity where Employee Inadvertently Informed Employer and Only “Hinted” at Filing Whistleblower Complaint

Seyfarth Synopsis: The DOL’s ARB rejected an employee’s SOX retaliation claim where he inadvertently provided information to his employer and only “hinted” that he was filing a SOX-protected complaint. The ARB seems unwilling to accept retaliation...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/arb-no-protected-activity-where-79236/

Related

President Trump Revokes Obama Executive Order Requiring Right of First Refusal for Service Employees

The President revoked Executive Order (E.O.) 13495, which required successor contractors to offer se...

Read More >

Chicago City Council Passes Comprehensive Fair Workweek Law that Includes Predictable Scheduling

The Chicago City Council has passed the Chicago Fair Workweek Ordinance, which requires large employ...

Read More >

Who is responsible for providing National Minimum Wage pay information in the context of a TUPE transfer?

Employers are required, under the National Minimum Wage Act 1998 (“Act”), to maintain pay records ...

Read More >

Recent Decision Highlights Risk Of Post-Employment Retaliation Claims

A federal court in Pennsylvania recently ruled that a former employee presented sufficient evidence ...

Read More >

California Employers Granted a One-Year Reprieve on New Mandatory Sexual Harassment Training Deadline

If you are scrambling to comply with the new California sexual harassment training requirements, we ...

Read More >

Court Shifts Responsibility for Making Service Contract Act Classifications to the Government

Any contractor providing services to the government knows that complying with the Service Contract A...

Read More >