X
24Sep

'Scott v. DST Systems': Court Rejects Mootness Fee for Target’s Supplemental Disclosures Explaining Valuation Analyses

Disclosure-only settlements of M&A class actions have received increased scrutiny since decisions like the Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 Trulia opinion and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s Walgreens decision from later that...
By: Morris James LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/scott-v-dst-systems-court-rejects-73178/

Related

The Arbitration Section In Your Employee Handbook Is Not An Agreement to Arbitrate

Federal law nowadays certainly favors enforcement of agreements to arbitrate. But generally applicab...

Read More >

New NLRB Rule Clarifies Joint Employer Doctrine

Reduces Joint Employer Liability, Brings Clarity for Employers - The National Labor Relations Board...

Read More >

Did ‘Silicon Valley’ Get CFIUS Right? Can It Really Ruin Everything?

While CFIUS can’t stop a U.S. company from relocating overseas just because the committee decides t...

Read More >

Recent Trends in Officer Liability

More than a decade ago in the seminal case Gantler v. Stephens, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified...

Read More >

A Radically Changing Landscape

The FTI Journal continues its look at opportunities for private equity in distressed M&A given the p...

Read More >

DOE Employees and Contractors Prohibited from Certain Talent Recruitment Programs

To address national security interests and prevent the unauthorized transfer of scientific and techn...

Read More >