X
24Sep

'Scott v. DST Systems': Court Rejects Mootness Fee for Target’s Supplemental Disclosures Explaining Valuation Analyses

Disclosure-only settlements of M&A class actions have received increased scrutiny since decisions like the Delaware Court of Chancery’s 2016 Trulia opinion and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit’s Walgreens decision from later that...
By: Morris James LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/scott-v-dst-systems-court-rejects-73178/

Related

4 Key Reasons Why European P2P Deals Fail – and How Private Equity Deal Teams Can Avoid Them

Adherence to secrecy, pre-announcement preparations, realistic expectations-setting, and strategic p...

Read More >

Q&A: M&A In The Oil & Gas Sector

Jim Hansen, Head of Investment Banking at Opportune Partners LLC, gives his thoughts on the state of...

Read More >

[Webinar] Strategies for Dealing with Claims – Project Schedule - October 29th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm EST

Bricker & Eckler's construction attorneys are proud to present "Top Gun," our premier Midwest constr...

Read More >

SECURE Act Brings About Significant Changes to IRAs

As we reach the end of 2019 and prepare to flip the calendar to 2020, Congress and the president hav...

Read More >

EEOC, NLRB, DOL Plan to Issue Rules Governing Joint Employment

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Labor Relations Board, and the Department of L...

Read More >

In a Win for Employers, California Supreme Court Limits Reach of PAGA

On September 12, 2019, the California Supreme Court decided ZB N.A. v. Superior Court and issued a r...

Read More >