16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") recently adopted amendments to Regulation S-X and...
Read More >
The American Bar Association’s (ABA) Business Law Section has released its 2019 Private Target Deal...
Read More >
A bifurcated benefit option allows participants to receive a portion of their benefit as a lump sum ...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has announced the annual revisions to the Hart-Scott-Rodino A...
Read More >
Returns from Asia-Pacific merger arbitrage positions have proved consistently attractive over time, ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: As the future of work continues to take shape, labor unions are taking notice and...
Read More >