X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

DOL Rule Makes 1.3 Million Workers Eligible for Overtime Pay

On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule, effective January ...

Read More >

Poison Pill Deep Dive Series: The Inadvertent Triggering Exception

The first of a six-part series examining six specific and evolving rights plan provisions. An incre...

Read More >

(Artificially) Intelligent Hiring: Good Solution or Technology Gone Mad?

“Success in creating [Artificial Intelligence] would be the biggest event in human history. Unfort...

Read More >

DOL releases new e-disclosure rule

The Department of Labor (DOL) proposed a new rule to allow retirement plan disclosures to be posted ...

Read More >

Rise In Denials Of H-1B Visas Results In More Litigation, Instability, Report States

It is no secret that H-1B visa denial rates have been on the rise over the last two years. Recent re...

Read More >

Investment Funds: Sun Capital Reversal Offers Important Takeaways Regarding Portfolio Company Pension Liabilities

The First Circuit reverses a lower court decision and finds two Sun Capital private equity funds are...

Read More >