16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
As a plan provider, it makes sense to create an ancillary line of business if it’s a natural carryo...
Read More >
Governor Lamont signs House Bill 7501 into law on January 6, 2020. As we say goodbye to 2019 (and a...
Read More >
- The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976 requires parties that meet certain transa...
Read More >
The National Advisory Committee on Occupational Safety and Health (NACOSH) will hold a meeting in Wa...
Read More >
Dittman v. UPMC, 196 A.3d 1036 (Pa. 2018). The Pennsylvania Supreme Court holds that employers have...
Read More >
For the one-year period beginning September 1, 2019 and ending August 31, 2020, plan sponsors of sta...
Read More >