16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration has raised its civil penalties for the fifth year ...
Read More >
At the end of January the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) published a final rule establishing ...
Read More >
The sometimes agonizingly slow Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is trying to be more efficien...
Read More >
In Peters v. WCAB (Cintas Corp), No. 1835 C.D. 2017, the Commonwealth Court was tasked with deciding...
Read More >
On March 19, 2020, Governor Gavin Newsom issued a stay-at-home order for the State of California tha...
Read More >
SBA Releases Guidance Addressing Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions in the Context of Paycheck Prote...
Read More >