X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Final CFIUS Regulations Implement Significant Changes by Broadening Jurisdiction and Updating Scope of Reviews

The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued final regulations late yesterday that significantly expan...

Read More >

No California Waiting-Time, Inaccurate Wage Statement Penalties Based On Unpaid Meal Period Premiums, Court Rules

Do meal period premiums trigger derivative liability for waiting-time penalties and inaccurate wage ...

Read More >

UK Government Responds to Proposals to Prevent Misuse of NDAs in Harassment and Discrimination Cases

The UK government has published its response to its proposals to prevent the misuse of nondisclosure...

Read More >

Developers: Why you should care about Local Strategic Planning Statements

With NSW Minister for Planning and Public Spaces, Robert Stokes’ desire to end spot rezonings, and ...

Read More >

OFCCP Week In Review: December 2019 #5

The DE OFCCP Week in Review (WIR) is a simple, fast and direct summary of relevant happenings in the...

Read More >