16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
• Following the financial crisis, nonbank lenders looking to carve out new, profitable niches—espe...
Read More >
Technology dealmaking has continued apace in 2020 as M&A investors take advantage of the sector’s r...
Read More >
An acquisition of a new company into your corporate portfolio can be an exciting challenge. As a Hum...
Read More >
In this episode of Tarter Krinsky & Drogin's podcast series Law Brief, Non-Competes Are Not So Bad! ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Voris v. Lampert, the California Supreme Court held that unpaid wages cannot b...
Read More >
On October 8, 2019, the Department of Labor ("DOL") issued long awaited rules that could have a sign...
Read More >