X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Don’t Know What You Got (Till It’s Gone): Is OSHA Required to Give Managers and Supervisors Their Rights Before Interviewing Them?

When an inspector from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) shows up at your wor...

Read More >

Trump To Nominate Gene Scalia As Secretary Of Labor

On July 18th President Trump announced his intention to nominate Eugene Scalia to replace former Sec...

Read More >

New York Governor Vetoes Employee Wage Lien Bill

On December 31, 2019, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo vetoed the employee wage lien bill (colloquially refe...

Read More >

Five USERRA Responsibilities Employers Should Know Regarding Soldiers In The Workplace

Veterans Day is a good time to refresh employers on the federal rights entitled to their employees w...

Read More >

Answers to 10 Questions About California’s Ban on Mandatory Arbitration of Statutory Employment Claims

California is set to become the only state to outlaw predispute mandatory arbitration of statutory e...

Read More >

[Webinar] The Dynamics of Antitrust Agency Investigations: A Second Request Update - October 14th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

HSR Act-driven Second Request responses require an uncommon balance of understanding, expertise, and...

Read More >