X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Key Takeaways from Manufacturing Dealmaker Perspectives Webinar

The sudden arrival of the COVID-19 pandemic in the first quarter of 2020 shocked an M&A market that ...

Read More >

Impact of 2018 Delaware Chancery Court Appraisal Decisions on Transaction Valuations

In this white paper, FTI Consulting’s valuation expert Brent Miller dives into the impact of the 20...

Read More >

Reminder: July 1 Minimum Wage Increases In A City Near You

July may seem like a sleepy summer month, but don’t forget — for many cities in California it is t...

Read More >

[Video] Startup Compensation: Tips to Avoid Liability and Keep Your Investors Happy

There are many ways to run afoul of labor laws and spook your investors—one of the most common for ...

Read More >

Impending Illinois Expansion of Sex Harassment, Equal Pay, and Leave Requirements

Illinois Governor Pritzker is expected to sign several amendatory bills into law expanding employer ...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Canada - Q3 2019

With some Canada Labour Code (CLC) amendments in Bill C-44, the Budget Implementation Act, 2017, No....

Read More >