X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Minneapolis Follows the State’s Lead and Enacts its Own Wage Theft Ordinance

On August 8, 2019, the Minneapolis City Council unanimously passed the Wage Theft Prevention Ordinan...

Read More >

PBGC Report Reminds Manufacturers of the Coming Threat

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation released its Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report and, you guesse...

Read More >

2019 Summer review: M&A legal and market developments

We set out in the attached Newsletter a number of interesting English court decisions and market dev...

Read More >

“Ok, Boomer” Not Okay in the Workplace

The latest catchphrase in the ongoing generational battle between Millennials and their more senior ...

Read More >

A Small Administrative Health Care Fix Gets Court Approval (So Far)

The hyper-partisan political warfare in the American health care industry is far from over. But anot...

Read More >

Indemnify is a Funny Word Carrying Historical Baggage—Be Aware and Use with Care

Despite the proliferation of R&W insurance as the sole recourse for buyers with respect to sellers’...

Read More >