X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Pensions: What's new this week

Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to spee?d on the...

Read More >

ERISA (10th Circuit): ACCIDENTAL DEATH BENEFIT – Death by Speeding Vehicle Excluded Under “Crime” Exclusion

You know that the standard of review applied by courts will significantly impact how courts view an ...

Read More >

The SECURE Act: Implications For Individuals And Small Business Owners

Executive summary- On December 20, 2019, President Trump signed sweeping legislation that materiall...

Read More >

2020 Brings Changes To California Employment Laws

As 2019 comes to a close, here is a look ahead to some of the legislation going into effect on Janua...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance into the Weeds: Episode 138-the Juniper Networks FCPA Enforcement Action

Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...

Read More >