16Sep
The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause
The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By:
Ropes & Gray LLP
Related
On the same day that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) filed a lawsuit against the Farmers National...
Read More >
In Arizona, non-compete agreements may be enforceable if “reasonable.” In determining whether a no...
Read More >
Hyundai is reportedly in the process of purchasing a large controlling interest in robot innovator B...
Read More >
The Residential Apartment Buildings (Compliance & Enforcement Powers) Act 2020 (NSW) (RAB Act) came ...
Read More >
New York state lawmakers were busy during the final days of the legislative session, introducing and...
Read More >
Buyers’ best defence against M&A fraud requires rigorous, pre-closing due diligence — when fraud i...
Read More >