X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Court issues opinions regarding inclusion of developer fees in cost basis under the Section 1603 Renewable Energy Cash Grant Program

On June 20, 2019, the Court of Federal Claims released its opinions in the consolidated cases of Cal...

Read More >

EEOC, NLRB, DOL Plan to Issue Rules Governing Joint Employment

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, National Labor Relations Board, and the Department of L...

Read More >

Predictable Scheduling Makes Its Way To Chicago

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is expected to sign into law the City Council’s recently passed Chicag...

Read More >

Unpaid Future Commissions Can Be Trebled under Massachusetts Wage Act, SJC Rules

In Massachusetts, a commission is a wage subject to the Wage Act when the amount of the commission “...

Read More >

SSA No-Match Letters and Employer Obligations

The Social Security Administration (SSA) has drastically increased its issuance of Employer Correcti...

Read More >

Financial Daily Dose 6.30.2020 | Top Story: Supreme Court Allows President to Fire CFPB Director, Lets Agency Remain

By a 5-4 margin, the Supreme Court has ordered the restructuring of the Consumer Financial Protectio...

Read More >