X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Raising The Bar: DOL Ups Salary Basis Requirement For Overtime Exemptions

This week, the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) unveiled the final version of its overtime exempti...

Read More >

Employers: March 2 is the deadline to file 2019 injury and illness summaries

Employers subject to the Occupational Safety & Health Administration’s (OSHA) reporting requirement...

Read More >

Article 22 EU Merger Referrals

The European Commission (EC) has announced that - from mid-2021 - it will start accepting referrals ...

Read More >

The Seventh Circuit Rules on Whether to Send Notice in FLSA Collective Actions to Individuals with Arbitration Agreements

On January 24, 2020, the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals became the second federal appellate court ...

Read More >

Best Practices in Administering Benefit Claims #1 – Know (and Read) Your Plan Document

Our ERISA Practice Center blog posts often discuss many complex, and sometimes esoteric, substantive...

Read More >

Important EEO-1 Component 2 Deadline Approaching This Month

An important deadline approaches for those employers required to file the EEO-1 survey – which gene...

Read More >