X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

Vermont Legislative Update 01-10-2020 - An analysis from DRM's Government & Public Affairs Team

News about severe financial difficulties at the Brattleboro Retreat quickly spread throughout the St...

Read More >

It May Be a Global Economy, but ERISA Wants You to Keep Your Plan Assets in the United States

Enacted in 1974, ERISA celebrates its 45th birthday this year. A lot has changed in those 45 years. ...

Read More >

The Year of Dynamex: Navigating California’s Assembly Bill 5

On September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law Assembly Bill 5 (A.B. 5). A....

Read More >

The 12 Days of California Labor & Employment Series – Day 7: Cal/OSHA Reporting Requirements

It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new ...

Read More >

Congress (Finally) Passes the SECURE Act

After a delay of several months, Congress passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhan...

Read More >

[Video] #WorkforceWednesday: Coronavirus Balancing Act, Vaccination Requirements, #MeToo - Employment Law This Week®

It’s #WorkforceWednesday! We invite you to watch the week’s top workforce management and employmen...

Read More >