X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

12 Legal Tools to Push Climate Preparedness

We know that, mostly as a result of climate change, extreme weather events are becoming more frequen...

Read More >

Private Investment Funds Not Liable for Portfolio Company's Pension Withdrawal Liability

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has held in Sun Capital Partners III, LP v. New Engl...

Read More >

[Audio] Trekking Through Compliance-Episode 76 – The Cloud Miners

In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode The Cloud Miners which aired...

Read More >

NLRB Rules Independent Contractor Misclassification Does Not Violate NLRA

In a case of first impression, a divided panel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB or Board)...

Read More >

Treasury Is the Linchpin to Unlocking Value in a Divestiture – Spins or Carve-Out Sales

As the pandemic drives companies to realign business strategies, look to your corporate treasury fun...

Read More >

Dangers of Bicycle Accidents (Infographic)

Commuting by bicycle has grown in popularity in the last 20 years, with the number of cyclists in th...

Read More >