X
16Sep

The Risks of Not Strictly Complying with a “No Shop” Clause

The recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision to deny a motion to dismiss in Genuine Parts Company v. Essendant Inc.1 provides worthwhile reminders of the necessity of deal participants in acquisition transactions to strictly comply with a “no shop”...
By: Ropes & Gray LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-risks-of-not-strictly-complying-63640/

Related

[Audio] Contemporary Workplace Environments

Verrill attorney Tawny Alvarez interviewed Jeana Stewart, NCIDQ, LEED AP, and workplace studio leade...

Read More >

How Many 457(b) Plans Do You Need?

Many cities and special districts establish and maintain more 457(b) plans than they really need. We...

Read More >

New Retirement Distribution Rules Begin in 2020: The SECURE Act Giveth and Taketh Away: Pullman & Comley

The first important new law impacting retirement distributions in over a decade was enacted on Decem...

Read More >

Doing Deals In the COVID-19 Era: Renegotiating Price and Other Changes Before Closing

What does Victoria’s Secret reveal about the perilous nature of doing deals in a pandemic? In two w...

Read More >

Ohio Supreme Court Upholds Constitutionality of State Statute Prohibiting Local Residency Requirements for Public Construction Projects

In a close 4 to 3 decision, the Ohio Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of a state sta...

Read More >

HR Two Minute Monthly: whistleblowing; religion or belief discrimination; employment status

Our October update considers recent developments in employment law, including cases on the whistlebl...

Read More >