11Sep
Say Whaaat? The Sixth Circuit Debates “Corpus Linguistics” as a Tool for Statutory Interpretation
A seemingly routine Sixth Circuit appeal involving the interpretation of the federal Employee Retirement Income Security Act statute (ERISA) recently sparked an interesting debate between two Circuit Judges — Amul Thapar and Jane Stranch — on the use...
By:
Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP
Related
This month's key employment law cases address the enforcement of arbitration agreements. Diaz v. S...
Read More >
For the last 150 years, the "motivating factor" standard of proof test was the pinnacle of what a pl...
Read More >
Practically speaking, and despite taking careful precautions, it is likely that one of your employee...
Read More >
One of the major trends in recent years in employment discrimination law has been the lowering of th...
Read More >
In the 2006 case Childs v. Desormeaux, the Supreme Court of Canada provided initial clarification on...
Read More >
The US Supreme Court recently agreed to review the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Thole v. US Bank, i...
Read More >