X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

Manufacturers Can Apply "Optional Safety Device" Exception to Design Defect Claims in Rental Market

New York state's High Court has expanded the optional safety device exception to strict products lia...

Read More >

Quarterly Investment Update - 3rd Quarter 2019

Stock Market Commentary - Trade and interest rates continued to be the headline market movers for ...

Read More >

The EEOC's Shocking Reversal on LGBT Protections Under Title VII

Does Title VII protect transgender people from employment discrimination? The Equal Employment Oppor...

Read More >

California Governor Says Gig Unions Are On The Way As He Signs ABC Test Into Law

California Governor Gavin Newsom wasted little time by signing AB 5 into law yesterday, and his sign...

Read More >

Coronavirus: What Should Schools, Colleges, and Universities Do Now?

The risk of coronavirus may be lower than the flu, but with the numbers of cases and fatalities grow...

Read More >

Hong Kong Regulatory Update - September 2020

The Hong Kong Stock Exchange continues to pursue and implement a number of rule changes aimed at mak...

Read More >