X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

NLRB Modifies the "Quickie" Election Rules

At the end of 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its long-anticipated final rule...

Read More >

Transfer Restrictions in Joint Acquisition Vehicles: How to Overcome Some Lurking Issues

Tags, drags, ROFOs, and ROFRs raise a number of substantive and procedural issues for parties to joi...

Read More >

Clarity Comes to Compensation Data Collection: EEOC Guidance and Notices Issued for EEO-1 Filers

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a set of Frequently Asked Questions (F...

Read More >

The Supreme Court Will Take Another Look At Its ERISA Stock-Drop Pleading Standard

Synopsis: ERISA stock-drop litigation has diminished in recent years due to the Supreme Court’s Dud...

Read More >

New Guidance on EEO-1 Component 2 Data Submissions For Companies Involved in Corporate Transactions

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has released additional guidance regarding the ne...

Read More >

Littler Global Guide - Ireland - Q4 2019

Supreme Court Confirms When an Employee is Entitled to Legal Representation - Precedential Decision...

Read More >