X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

A New Law Passed Raising the Standard for Classifying Workers as Independent Contractors in California

Since April 30, 2018, when the landmark California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West...

Read More >

South Carolina Department of Revenue Announces Changes to County Tiers for 2020

The South Carolina Department of Revenue has released the 2020 county tier rankings for all South Ca...

Read More >

Delaware Court of Chancery Declines to Find a Material Adverse Effect and Orders Specific Performance of a Merger

On December 18, 2019, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a 119-page post-trial memorandum opinion...

Read More >

The Seoul Protocol: Guidelines for Remote Arbitration Hearings During the COVID-19 Outbreak

As the COVID-19 pandemic continues to upend carefully choreographed arbitration schedules, parties, ...

Read More >

[Webinar] Antitrust Developments to be Aware of in 2021 and Beyond - November 18th, 2:00 pm - 3:00 pm EST

This year has seen its fair share of change, and the same is true for antitrust laws impacting the h...

Read More >

Appeals Court Rejects Disability Discrimination Claim Of Employee With Supervisor-Induced Stress And Migraines

When an employee requests an accommodation or asserts a claim under the Americans with Disabilities ...

Read More >