X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

Top 10 Things to Know About the New FLSA Overtime Calculations

Beginning January 15, 2020, new, more employer-friendly regulations determine how overtime pay is ca...

Read More >

Considerations for Use of Arbitration Agreements to Curtail Class Claims

May 21, 2019, marks the one-year anniversary of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Epic Systems C...

Read More >

The Surprisingly Broad Scope Definition of Workplace Accidents in France

The legal definition of “workplace accidents” under French law does not normally make global headl...

Read More >

Second Circuit Rules Against Plaintiff in AutoZone Case and Allows Nixing of her Deposition

Seyfarth Synopsis: In affirming summary judgment in favor of AutoZone, the Second Circuit rules that...

Read More >

Another Reminder That the UK Merger Control Regime Is More Than Just Voluntary

On 6 August 2019, the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (the “CMA”) imposed an ‘Unwinding O...

Read More >

Department Of Justice Issues Latest Merger Remedies Manual, Focusing On Preference For Structural Remedies

On September 3, 2020, the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice (the “Division”) is...

Read More >