X
10Sep

Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds

Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By: Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/

Related

COVID-19 as a Material Adverse Effect? A Discussion of Recent Cases

The outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the uncertainty surrounding its lo...

Read More >

Court Grants Preliminary Injunction On Enforcement Of California Ban On Employment Arbitration Agreements

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California has granted a request for a prelimina...

Read More >

FTC and DOJ ‘Temporarily’ Suspend Early Termination Grants; No Clear End to Suspension Identified

The DOJ and FTC have suspended early termination (i.e., early clearance) for filings made under the ...

Read More >

Governor Cuomo Enacts Expansion of New York State Human Rights Law—Certain Changes Have Immediate Effect

On August 12, 2019, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed Assembly Bill A8421 / Senate Bill 6577 (“Law”), w...

Read More >

New California Employment Laws for 2020

2020 is upon us, and with it, a slew of new employment laws that are now in effect. Read on for a de...

Read More >

Post-Filing, Pre-Institution Merger Time-Bars Inter Partes Review

In Power Integrations v. Semiconductor Components, the Federal Circuit ruled that privy and real-par...

Read More >