10Sep
Franchisor had no Duty to Protect Franchisee’s Employee From Sexual Harassment, Court Finds
Franchisors should review their franchise agreements and practices to ensure they do not retain or exercise control over the particular aspects of their franchisees’ employment practices in light of a recent decision reinforcing that a negligence...
By:
Faegre Baker Daniels
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/franchisor-had-no-duty-to-protect-55174/
Related
At the end of 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued its long-anticipated final rule...
Read More >
Tags, drags, ROFOs, and ROFRs raise a number of substantive and procedural issues for parties to joi...
Read More >
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has issued a set of Frequently Asked Questions (F...
Read More >
Synopsis: ERISA stock-drop litigation has diminished in recent years due to the Supreme Court’s Dud...
Read More >
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has released additional guidance regarding the ne...
Read More >
Supreme Court Confirms When an Employee is Entitled to Legal Representation - Precedential Decision...
Read More >