X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Rewriting California’s Independent Contractor Rules: A Business Survival Guide

With his signature on AB 5 on September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom has completed the...

Read More >

Employment Alert: "The DOL’s Final Rule On Increasing The Salary Threshold For FLSA Exemptions"

This is an update to our March 2019 Employment Alert “The Salary Test Revisited: DOL Proposes Incre...

Read More >

Third Circuit Tackles Third-Party Funding Issues in In Re: National Football League Players’ Concussion Injury Litigation

Third-party litigation funding has received increased scrutiny over the past several years, particul...

Read More >

The hardship distribution

It’s 2019 and while the hardship rules are changing for 2020, keep in mind that hardship distributi...

Read More >

Dining with Dogs Responsibly (and Legally) in Georgia

Dogs have always been our best friends, so it’s not surprising that more and more restaurants are m...

Read More >

California’s Injury and Illness Prevention Plans: New Rules on Employee Access

California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board adopted a new safety rule on January 16...

Read More >