X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Financial Institutions M&A: Sector trends - June 2019: Specialty finance/Marketplace lending

Financial institutions M&A sector trends: specialty finance/marketplace lending — H1 2019 and outlo...

Read More >

California Supreme Court Turns Down Unpaid Wages Claim Under PAGA

The California Supreme Court has ruled that unpaid wages cannot be recovered in private attorney gen...

Read More >

Best Practices: Protecting Your Trade Secrets in the M&A Virtual Data Room

Every day, businesses large and small are seeking to be acquired, in whole or in part. (While such e...

Read More >

Unlawful, or Just Mean? California Appellate Court Decides Discrimination Case

People with disabilities have legal protections under both federal and state law. California’s Fair...

Read More >

Freelancer Writers Are The Latest Group To Challenge California’s Gig Economy Law – But Will It Do Any Good?

The clock is steadily ticking towards midnight on December 31, and once the illuminated cluster of g...

Read More >

New Research: Do Managers of a Target Corporation Withhold Good News?

Does increased appraisal risk have an effect on manager behavior?  Recent research (unpublished) sug...

Read More >