X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Chancery Certifies Interlocutory Appeal for Determination of Impact of Remote Proceedings on a Party’s Due Process Rights

Forescout Tech., Inc. v. Ferrari Grp. Holdings, L.P., C.A. No. 2020-0385-SG (Del. Ch. July 14, 2020)...

Read More >

Reminder: Update Your California Skilled and Trained Workforce Compliance Procedures for 2020

As we begin the new year, it is a good time to look at requirements that change from year to year. I...

Read More >

Weekly Update Newsletter - July 2019 #2

GOVERNMENT CONTRACTS LAW - Long-Awaited Proposed Rule for Lower-Tier Subcontracting Plan Credit Fi...

Read More >

Small World.

A bit of impeachment/employment law trivia. The famous (or infamous, depending on your leanings or ...

Read More >

The DOL Starts 2020 With a Bevy of Opinion Letters

Not sitting on its laurels, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has already issued three new opinion ...

Read More >

AB 1291 Forces California Cannabis Companies To Sign “Labor Peace Agreements” With Unions, But Statute May be Unconstitutional

On October 12, 2019, Governor Newsom signed Assembly Bill 1291 (“AB 1291”) into law, which require...

Read More >