05Sep
Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds
When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By:
Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/
Related
With his signature on AB 5 on September 18, 2019, California Governor Gavin Newsom has completed the...
Read More >
This is an update to our March 2019 Employment Alert “The Salary Test Revisited: DOL Proposes Incre...
Read More >
Third-party litigation funding has received increased scrutiny over the past several years, particul...
Read More >
It’s 2019 and while the hardship rules are changing for 2020, keep in mind that hardship distributi...
Read More >
Dogs have always been our best friends, so it’s not surprising that more and more restaurants are m...
Read More >
California’s Occupational Safety and Health Standards Board adopted a new safety rule on January 16...
Read More >