X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

New York State Department of Labor Publishes Guidance on Salary History Inquiry Law

The New York State Department of Labor (NYSDOL) has published guidance on the state’s salary histor...

Read More >

Oregon Passes Nation’s Most Generous Paid Family Leave Law

While many Oregonians were enjoying a leisurely holiday break last week, Oregon lawmakers were busy ...

Read More >

California And Illinois Move Forward On Healthcare Laws To Protect Patient Safety

Key Points- California law provides enhanced whistleblower protection to employees who work in heal...

Read More >

Caution When Approaching Artistry

A $6.75 million judgment was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, against a...

Read More >

New York District Court Expands the Scope of the Bankruptcy Safe Harbor for LBO Payments

In 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit made headlines when it ruled that creditor...

Read More >

South Carolina Federal Court Finds No Coverage for Faulty Workmanship Damages Discovered Years After Occurrence-Based Policy Expiration

Potential Six-Year Delay in Notice of Flood and Mold Damage “Substantially Prejudiced” Insurer - ...

Read More >