X
05Sep

Third-Party Bonuses Are Not Necessarily “Remuneration” For Overtime Purposes, Third Circuit Holds

When an employer permits its employees to participate in a bonus program offered by the employer’s client, based on the work performed for that client, those bonuses do not always qualify as “remuneration for employment” that must be included in the...
By: Jackson Lewis P.C.
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/third-party-bonuses-are-not-necessarily-53843/

Related

Key California Employment Law Cases: January 2020

Ridgeway v. Wal-Mart, Inc., 946 F.3d 1066 (9th Cir. 2020) - The employer must pay minimum wages to ...

Read More >

COBRA Notice Litigation Resulting In Big Dollar Claims

Can you imagine something as simple as a COBRA Notice missing a few technical requirements resulting...

Read More >

Mylan and Pfizer’s Upjohn Unit Unveil New Branding For Joint Operation

We have previously reported that Mylan and Upjohn, Pfizer’s off-patent branded and generic business...

Read More >

Seventh Circuit Declines To Award Damages To Victorious Janus Plaintiff

An employee who paid “fair share” union fees under protest is not entitled to damages to refund an...

Read More >

Construction Industry Employers And COVID-19

In the current pandemic, it is important for construction employers to understand safety and health ...

Read More >

Annual EEO Public File Report Deadline for Stations in Arkansas, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, New Jersey, New York, and Oklahoma

February 1 is the deadline for broadcast stations licensed to communities in Arkansas, Kansas, Louis...

Read More >