23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
What can we really say about 2020?—a year more unique than any year we can remember. For financial ...
Read More >
In Ephrat et al v medCPU, Inc., the Delaware Court of Chancery considered whether a separation agree...
Read More >
With the coronavirus sweeping through major manufacturing hubs in China, the government has mandated...
Read More >
A few years ago, I represented a process piping subcontractor in a claim against the general contrac...
Read More >
In the final days of its 2019 Session, the New York State Legislature passed three bills that, respe...
Read More >
In William Lansing v. Doe, 2019 Ore. App. LEXIS 1564, the Court of Appeals of Oregon considered whet...
Read More >