23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Generation Z has hit the job market. The workplace now has several distinct generations working toge...
Read More >
Setting clear and reasonable standards for taking access to an employer’s private property is high ...
Read More >
Under Connecticut law, the “Safe Harbor” provision of C.G.S. § 31-294c (b) has widely been interp...
Read More >
After meeting for 140 days at the Capitol, Texas Legislators adjourned the 86th Legislative Session ...
Read More >
Ending a more than 15-year-long legal battle, the Fifth Circuit on May 24, 2019, unanimously affirme...
Read More >
Mostly Divisions- Over the last several months, many of the projects on which I have been working h...
Read More >