23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Effective January 1, 2020, employers may put aside pre-tax funds into a health reimbursement arrange...
Read More >
As you may have heard, five amendments to the California Consumer Privacy Act (AB-25; AB-874; AB-114...
Read More >
A workers’ compensation arbitration decision was recently filed in what appears to be the first tim...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the Pennsylvania State Senate passed Senate Bill 79 (“SB 79”), which would i...
Read More >
Although California does not have a specific biometric privacy law like Illinois’s 2008 Biometric I...
Read More >
In the 2006 case Childs v. Desormeaux, the Supreme Court of Canada provided initial clarification on...
Read More >