23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Due to the developing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has implem...
Read More >
Toledo, Ohio is the latest jurisdiction (and the second city in Ohio) to enact a law that will prohi...
Read More >
The task of securing company networks and systems is no longer delegated solely to an organization’...
Read More >
The FTC published its views on divestiture packages used to obtain clearance under the HSR Act. Acc...
Read More >
Without fail, every day I get emails that want to target one or more of my important online accounts...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The Second Circuit held that attorneys’ fee awards in FLSA settlements are not l...
Read More >