23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) has allocated $22 million to target the growing issue of abus...
Read More >
Former Plant Manager Bullied Employees, Then Fired Employee Who Complained, Federal Agency Charged -...
Read More >
In recent weeks, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (“OFCCP”) has entered into fou...
Read More >
It is often taken for granted that only the named parties to a contract can enforce it. The English ...
Read More >
On January 28, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) published adjusted reporting thresholds unde...
Read More >
In September 2019, the New Jersey Division of Rights (“DCR”) issued enforcement guidance (“Guidan...
Read More >