23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Where we are. Though most cases are mild, the number of coronavirus (COVID-19) cases worldwide has n...
Read More >
In his classic 1998 business book “Who Moved my Cheese?,” Spencer Johnson discussed the need for b...
Read More >
It's the end of the year and while everyone is busy, employers in California should be aware of new ...
Read More >
The Fourth Circuit’s recent decision in Evangeline Parker v. Reema Consulting Services, Incorporate...
Read More >
In our increasingly integrated world, companies must coordinate their compliance efforts throughout ...
Read More >
Global Warming Solutions Act: asking for too much or not enough? The House Committee on Energy and ...
Read More >