23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In this episode, I visit with Don Stern, Managing Director of Corporate Monitoring & Consulting Serv...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) proposal to amend its union representation procedures r...
Read More >
Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...
Read More >
“Successor liability”, is it a theory or distinct claim or cause of action? In a recent decision, ...
Read More >
On September 10, 2019, the California Senate passed AB5, a sweeping bill to control the use of indep...
Read More >
Artificial intelligence is a set of code designed to perform specific tasks, including capabilities ...
Read More >