23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On June 18, 2019, Governor Ned Lamont signed into law a new bill imposing significant changes to sex...
Read More >
The New Jersey Supreme Court has granted certification and will review the Appellate Division decisi...
Read More >
Last summer, we advised that the Pennsylvania legislature was considering a bill that would require ...
Read More >
Executive summary - This is the first time that the Supreme Court has had to decide an appeal relati...
Read More >
One of the key points that representatives of the DOJ and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) h...
Read More >
On Tuesday, April 7, we issued an alert in connection with New York Governor Andrew M. Cuomo’s Exec...
Read More >