23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The federal appropriations bill enacted into law on December 20, 2019 changed federal law in ways th...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: On January 30, 2020, the Maryland General Assembly voted to override Governor Lar...
Read More >
Recently, Colorado’s Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) proposed certain amendments to the r...
Read More >
Tailored considerations for boards of directors and management in the current environment. Key Poin...
Read More >
World Law Group member firms recently collaborated on a Global Venture Capital Guide that covers mor...
Read More >
The Massachusetts Appeals Court recently decided that a settlement agreement resolving a zoning case...
Read More >