23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The IRS has just issued the cost of living adjustments for various retirement plan limitations that ...
Read More >
A “little bit of a crisis” was averted last week in the Chapter 11 bankruptcy case of St. Christop...
Read More >
Can a breach of one contract give rise to liability for lost profit on a related contract? Or is the...
Read More >
On September 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) announced a final rule to make an estimate...
Read More >
The Seventh Circuit joins the Eighth, Ninth and Tenth Circuits in holding that such a refusal would ...
Read More >
In response to the coronavirus pandemic, Governor DeSantis has issued Executive Order No. 20-51 decl...
Read More >