23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Despite news of additional COVID-19-related deaths and infections in America, central bankers appear...
Read More >
In a recent opinion, the Fairfax Circuit Court deemed unenforceable the non-compete and employee non...
Read More >
The DE OFCCP Week in Review (WIR) is a simple, fast and direct summary of relevant happenings in the...
Read More >
On December 3, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit affirmed the decision of the D...
Read More >
For countless companies that contract with other businesses for human capital or other services in w...
Read More >
The extent to which an employer is responsible in law for the harassment of its employees by third p...
Read More >