23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On December 16, 2019, in Valley Hospital Medical Center, Inc., Case 28-CA-213783, the National Labor...
Read More >
There is perhaps no more consistently vexing problem for transactional attorneys on opposite sides t...
Read More >
When and how two associations combine in a merger depends a lot on circumstances at the beginning, m...
Read More >
DOJ is catching up to compliance officers and evolving best practices. Say what you want, DOJ is be...
Read More >
The US Senate yesterday passed a package of tax extenders as part of the year-end appropriations act...
Read More >
California is set to become the only state to outlaw predispute mandatory arbitration of statutory e...
Read More >