23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
California employers have long grappled with two wage and hour questions: ..What rate of pay should...
Read More >
Egypt is getting closer to adopting a new merger control regime that would transform the system from...
Read More >
More than a decade ago in the seminal case Gantler v. Stephens, the Delaware Supreme Court clarified...
Read More >
Section 6039 of the Internal Revenue Code requires corporations to provide information statements to...
Read More >
In 2014, the National Labor Relations Board adopted regulations that considerably shortened the time...
Read More >
Fir Tree Value Master Fund, L.P. v. Jarden Corp., No. 454, 2019 (Del. July 9, 2020) - Adding to its...
Read More >