23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On January 10, 2020, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California heard oral argum...
Read More >
Key Takeaways - - On July 31, 2020, the U.S. Treasury Department, as chair of the Committee on Fore...
Read More >
On March 28, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Ag...
Read More >
The SECURE Act: What It Is And What It Is NOT - As part of a large year-end piece of legislation, ...
Read More >
Bank Failed to Accommodate Manager With Pregnancy-Related Disability, Federal Agency Charged - BAL...
Read More >
Daily headlines about the growing coronavirus threat have many employers concerned that they are not...
Read More >