23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Earlier this week, the Southern District heard arguments regarding the grant of a preliminary injunc...
Read More >
In Chief Counsel Memorandum 20200801F, released on February 21, 2020, the IRS established its positi...
Read More >
After an M&A transaction, a buyer may discover certain misrepresentations as to the target company’...
Read More >
Last year’s blockbuster opinion in Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG—the first Delaware case to fin...
Read More >
FASB has issued an Invitation to Comment, or ITC, as part of FASB’s project on certain identifiabl...
Read More >
Seyfarth Summary: Like the singers in “California Dreamin,” many out-of-state employers—on a wint...
Read More >