23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In our previous client alert, we reported that certain key changes were introduced to the United Ara...
Read More >
As predicted, Washington’s legislature has been busy over the past few months passing new laws that...
Read More >
In his first year in office, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed several laws impacting Californ...
Read More >
The Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission just concluded that an employer was being untru...
Read More >
Presented by Cohen Seglias attorneys Matthew Gioffre, Lisa Wampler, and Daniel E. Fierstein on Novem...
Read More >
On February 2, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), the agency charged with administering preme...
Read More >