23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: The regulated community had a pleasant surprise from President Trump this week. ...
Read More >
California’s new law (AB 51) criminalizing arbitration agreements in enforcement will not take effe...
Read More >
Dear Legal Mailbag: I am an avid reader of Legal Mailbag, and your advice has been helpful as I do ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Reversing course and overruling previous precedent, the Court of Appeals for the ...
Read More >
We previously highlighted Assembly Bill 51, which prohibits employers from requiring employees or ap...
Read More >
The Federal Trade Commission and the U.S. Department of Justice this week announced the final versio...
Read More >