23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Generally, a 403(b) plan is a retirement planning program whereby a public school or tax-exempt 501(...
Read More >
Today, in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that time spent by non-exempt em...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: As detailed in our 2020 Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, 2019 was an int...
Read More >
CLIENT ALERT: SBA to Enact Significant Changes to Small Business Regulations Before 2020: Everything...
Read More >
The Department of Treasury has released the final regulations implementing the Foreign Investment Ri...
Read More >
Who’s excited for the company holiday party?! Probably not your friendly neighborhood employment la...
Read More >