23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On October 10, 2019, Governor Newsom signed a law prohibiting employers from requiring employees to ...
Read More >
Last week, in our highlights of the 49th ICSC U.S. Law Conference, we touched on Dr. Mahzarin R. Ban...
Read More >
In an effort to assist employers, the EEOC has posted guidance and sample forms for the new EEO-1 Co...
Read More >
On September 5, 2019, the Washington Supreme Court confirmed that non-agricultural employers may use...
Read More >
Washington Nationals Stay in the Fight. The Washington Nationals are heading to the World Series for...
Read More >
Northrop Grumman has agreed to pay $12,375,000 to settle a class action brought under the Employee R...
Read More >