23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
On August 8, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division (collectively the "DOL") i...
Read More >
Many governmental 457(b) deferred compensation and 401(a) defined contribution plan sponsors do not ...
Read More >
The U.S. Treasury Department this week published draft regulations changing the requirements for man...
Read More >
If people pass on enough incorrect information out there, you start to believe it. When I worked at ...
Read More >
Have you seen situations in which executives are subject to non-compete and non-solicit covenants in...
Read More >
Michigan’s Occupational Code (“Code”) requires builders of residential structures to be licensed ...
Read More >