23Nov
Superior Court Dismisses Successor-by-Merger’s Claims Where Underlying Contract Contained Anti-Assignment Clause
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Super. Sept. 16, 2020) - Plaintiff’s predecessor-in-interest conveyed mineral rights to Defendant. Under the agreement, Defendant owed a conditional additional $1 million at a future date. Before the payments became due, the predecessor was merged out of existence....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In recent decisions, the Delaware Court of Chancery continued to follow the Delaware Supreme Court’...
Read More >
Havencrest Capital Management has announced it has acquired ThermoTek. ThermoTek, based in Flower M...
Read More >
Last week, the U.S. Department of Justice ("DOJ") launched the Procurement Collusion Strike Force ("...
Read More >
Well it’s been quite a year. Thank goodness it’s almost over! We started it (much as we have start...
Read More >
A recently signed amendment to the New Jersey WARN Act – the state’s version of the federal Worker...
Read More >
Few things are more fundamental to M&A due diligence than determining whether any of the material co...
Read More >