02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Applicants sought to subdivide two lots located at 550 Hill Street and 554 Hill Street in the Villag...
Read More >
Oregon passed several employment bills this year that will affect Oregon employers. The following ar...
Read More >
Since 2015, employers and health insurers have been required to report health plan coverage informat...
Read More >
In Arizona, non-compete agreements may be enforceable if “reasonable.” In determining whether a no...
Read More >
Our latest articles on recent issues and news affecting UK construction businesses. Brexit – and...
Read More >
Corporate, social and responsibility (CSR): three words when spoken together ought to mean something...
Read More >