02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The Washington, D.C. City Council is considering a proposed bill that would ban non-compete agreemen...
Read More >
Recent developments regarding immigration across the globe include changes to temporary and permanen...
Read More >
On August 9, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued the first of its planned series ...
Read More >
On March 3, 2020, Exact Sciences announced completion of its acquisition of Paradigm Diagnostics, In...
Read More >
The California Legislature and Governor Newsom have passed a sizable list of new laws governing the ...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The California Legislature has passed a series of bills for Governor Newsom to co...
Read More >