02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
SMALL BUSINESS PROGRAMS & ADVISORY SERVICES - SBA Issues Proposed Rule Changing Receipts Calculati...
Read More >
The recent amendment to HIV Law number 7771, includes amendments to some articles of the Labor Code....
Read More >
Virginia Eatery Routinely Subjected Gay Male Server and His Straight Friend to Homophobic Taunts and...
Read More >
On July 26, 2019, the National Mediation Board (NMB) announced that it is amending its regulations ...
Read More >
On Feb. 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced it is publishing revised reporting thr...
Read More >
As discussed in our June 18th blog entry, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and T...
Read More >