02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
As an alternative to termination, employers faced with employee drug or alcohol policy violations so...
Read More >
The legal updates keep coming for New York employers. Under another recently signed amendment, vict...
Read More >
After six months of primarily internal Democratic Party wrangling, on July 18, 2019 the House of Rep...
Read More >
The Use of "Time is of the Essence" Clauses in Commercial Real Estate Repurchase Options - In Di Mi...
Read More >
Assembly Bill 51, the controversial law that would have prevented employers from requiring employees...
Read More >
As of Thursday, March 19, 2020, Ohio State agencies are reporting that construction projects will co...
Read More >