02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
On August 20, 2019, Governor Andrew Cuomo signed an amendment to the New York Human Rights Law which...
Read More >
With data privacy issues constantly in the news, what do businesses need to know about handling pers...
Read More >
Welcome to the fall edition of the BakerHostetler Quarterly New York Employment Law Newsletter. We a...
Read More >
Unanimous decisions from the Federal Mine Safety and Health Commission are rare, but on July 11, 201...
Read More >
The Work Injury Compensation Bill 2019 (the Bill) was passed in Parliament on 3 September 2019. Broa...
Read More >
This Client Advisory highlights important developments in the law governing employee benefit plans a...
Read More >