02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Both the French and German authorities are particularly active in merger control at the member state...
Read More >
Host Vincent Walden talks with Jason Lee, CEO of DailyPay, a technology solution that lets employees...
Read More >
The six Bay Area counties that led the way in requiring their citizens to shelter in place on March ...
Read More >
Both the federal Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and its Connecticut counterpart provide eli...
Read More >
Minimum Age for Continued Unemployment Allowance Rises - New Legislation Enacted - The minimum age...
Read More >
The new year will bring significant changes for California employers, which could have substantial r...
Read More >