02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
On January 9, 2020, the National Institute of Statistics and Geography (INEGI by its acronym in Span...
Read More >
The withdrawal liability case of the year came to an anticlimactic end on Monday, September 16, 2019...
Read More >
If your company employs 100 or more employees or has 50 or more employees and a federal contract of ...
Read More >
The recent nominations of Ursula van de Leyen and Christine Lagarde to two of the most powerful posi...
Read More >
CYBERSECURITY & DATA PRIVACY - Department of Defense – The DoD Office of Inspector General (OIG) ...
Read More >
Steering board members clear of being named plan fiduciaries is a start. Most board members don’t ...
Read More >