02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/covid-19-high-court-issues-preliminary-65245/
Related
CONVERGE19 is in its 4th year of bringing together the world’s leading companies for 2 days of dyna...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: As we reported here, the CBD (cannabidiol) craze is sweeping the nation. By 2022,...
Read More >
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently provided additional guidance for the H-1B...
Read More >
Disrupting the Disruptor: How a Prepared and Proactive Owner Can Mitigate the Effects of Coronavirus...
Read More >
On September 21, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), with the concurrence of the Antitrust...
Read More >
In recent years, California has experienced the worst wildfires in its history, devastating the stat...
Read More >