02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
On June 6, 2019, Bill 108, the More Homes, More Choice Act received Royal Assent. The Bill includes ...
Read More >
Negative employee attitudes, chronic complaining, insubordination and gossiping are bad for the work...
Read More >
1. Treating Voluntary Uniformed Service Differently than Involuntary Service - The Uniformed Servic...
Read More >
Last year presented a great many challenges, and much like 2008–2009, the impact was felt on a glob...
Read More >
On December 19, 2019, the Senate passed, as part of the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act 2020...
Read More >
A company that does not perform adequate due diligence prior to a merger or acquisition may face bot...
Read More >