02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
New York’s Farm Laborers Fair Labor Practices Act went into effect on January 1, 2020, drastically ...
Read More >
As the recent Coronavirus outbreak continues, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) h...
Read More >
Frazier Healthcare Partners has announced it has acquired EPTAM Precision Solutions. EPTAM, with lo...
Read More >
Real estate developers and construction professionals have until mid-September to supply the Pennsyl...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: The UK’s departure from the European Union has now been delayed for the third ti...
Read More >
In recent years, many defined benefit (“DB”) pension plan sponsors have taken action to limit ongo...
Read More >