02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
If you live in Charleston, South Carolina, for most of your life you have been hearing about the pla...
Read More >
Definitely maybe. Severance benefits are subject to ERISA if they comprise a “plan, fund or program...
Read More >
Last year the Miami Beach City Commission passed a law requiring all hotels within the City of Miami...
Read More >
Can contractors “shop” bids after obtaining and using them to obtain contract awards? Generally s...
Read More >
You don't need to be an Earth, Wind, and Fire fan to realize September had all the elements necessar...
Read More >
A general contractor in Southern California found itself on the hook for its subcontractor’s failur...
Read More >