02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
For the first time since the Department of Justice Antitrust Division (DOJ) published non-horizontal...
Read More >
In a market with soaring multiples, private equity buyers are increasingly on the hunt to mitigate h...
Read More >
New Jersey is one of the more aggressive states in seeking to punish employers for the misclassifica...
Read More >
Stay at home orders. Social distancing measures. We talked with Mark Bloom and Andrew Ross about the...
Read More >
Company Rejected Security Officer Due to Pregnancy, Federal Agency Charges - SEATTLE - Tacoma-base...
Read More >
On April 22, 2020 Governor Tom Wolf announced that all businesses in the construction industry will ...
Read More >