02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Obligations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act - The Occupational Safety and Health Act ...
Read More >
On 24 December 2020, the European Union and the UK Government reached an agreement on the terms of t...
Read More >
Career satisfaction derives from filling a wide range of desires, and every individual partner defin...
Read More >
Moving Company Unfairly Denied Employment Opportunities to Pregnant Woman, Federal Agency Charges - ...
Read More >
The California Supreme Court has ruled that a former employee’s retaliation or discrimination claim...
Read More >
When an employer experiences growth and is projected to employ 50 or more employees, an employer can...
Read More >