02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
The Washington Supreme Court held for the first time yesterday that obesity is a protected class und...
Read More >
The French Foreign Investments Control regime has recently been reinforced following a reform introd...
Read More >
Please join Winstead for a webinar as we discuss the considerations and best practices for a phased ...
Read More >
For the first time in over 60 years, the U.S. Department of Labor today issued a final rule updating...
Read More >
It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always ...
Read More >
New York rang in the new year with a pair of significant labor law developments. Governor Andrew Cuo...
Read More >