02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
Every private construction project in Illinois will be affected by a new law, effective immediately....
Read More >
Pursuant to city ordinances effective August 1, 2019, many private employers in San Antonio and Dall...
Read More >
2019 brought continuing changes to employment law issues affecting the health care industry. The fol...
Read More >
On Feb. 13, 2020, final regulations became effective updating and refining rules regarding transacti...
Read More >
One of the hardest areas of M&A due diligence is the target company’s technology. The buyer has to...
Read More >
Report on Supply Chain Compliance 3, no. 3 (February 6, 2020) - Two apps for Android and iPhone re...
Read More >