21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
In bringing meal and rest period claims on behalf of their clients, the plaintiffs’ bar has long ar...
Read More >
The final Base Erosion and Anti-Abuse Tax regulations recently approved in T.D. 9885 generally follo...
Read More >
D.A. Nolt, Inc. v. The Philadelphia Municipal Authority, 2020 BL 199761 (E.D. Pa. May 28, 2020) - T...
Read More >
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has now held that a “place of business” for purpos...
Read More >
In November 2017, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (Staff) of the Securities and Exc...
Read More >
On Christmas Eve, the Third Circuit issued a decision restricting certification of wage/hour classes...
Read More >