21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
Whistleblower issues are in the news, mainly because a U.S. intelligence officer recently filed a co...
Read More >
In the wake of the COVID-19 outbreak and subsequent state and local government shutdown orders, some...
Read More >
The California Trucking Association (“Association”) challenges Assembly Bill 5 (“AB 5”) by argui...
Read More >
United States: July - September 2019 Update - The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and Department of...
Read More >
Kruse v. Synapse Wireless, Inc., C.A. No. 12392-VCS (Del. Ch. July 14, 2020) - This case illustrate...
Read More >
Synopsis: ERISA stock-drop litigation has diminished in recent years due to the Supreme Court’s Dud...
Read More >