21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
On July 22, 2019, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) issued its second Opini...
Read More >
Employers sometimes include fixed terms of employment in their employment agreement. Sometimes a fix...
Read More >
On September 9, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) clarified its standard for revie...
Read More >
Report on Supply Chain Compliance 2, no. 21 (November 7, 2019) - The deadline for compliance with a...
Read More >
It is not uncommon for indemnitees to attempt to add language to indemnification provisions providin...
Read More >
Employment Security Up to the Age 70 - Proposed Bill or Initiative - On December 25, 2019, Labor P...
Read More >