21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
Please join us for a webinar covering the latest updates to Washington’s Paid Family and Medical Le...
Read More >
• On June 21, 2019, the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) ...
Read More >
Various federal statutes contain whistleblower provisions that protect employees who raise or report...
Read More >
On February 6, 2020, in a 2-1 decision, the California Court of Appeal (Fourth District, Division Tw...
Read More >
Earlier this year, we wrote about the state of Brexit negotiations in the United Kingdom, and conclu...
Read More >
No Good News, but No Bad News Either - On 16 October 2019 the European Commission (EC) adopted a de...
Read More >