21Aug
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion
Eleventh Circuit Affirms “Exceptional Case” Ruling: Insurer Had No Duty to Defend Construction Debris Claim Where Amended Complaint Omitted Crucial Fact Implicating Pollution Exclusion The Eleventh Circuit, affirming the district court’s departure from Florida’s four corners rule, held that a pollution exclusion barred coverage for a bodily injury claim arising from exposure to construction debris, even though the operative pleading on its face stated a claim within coverage. The court applied...
By:
Rivkin Radler LLP
Related
Cash is king in construction, and inadequate cash flow is one of the major reasons that construction...
Read More >
Workers in the construction industry tend to be older than those in other industries, according to t...
Read More >
On April 8, 2020, Judge Leonard Stark of the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware denied...
Read More >
COVID-19’s severe impact on some major metropolitan areas has been attributed to their density, inf...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Halloween was last week, and you probably thought all the scary ghouls and goblin...
Read More >
We recently wrote about a new California law set to go into effect on January 1, 2020 that would out...
Read More >