26Aug
Chancery Denies Derivative Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Work Product Prepared by Oracle’s Special Litigation Committee
In re Oracle Corp. Derivative Litig., C.A. No. 2017-0337-SG (Del. Ch. July 9, 2020) - After investigating certain potential derivative claims arising out of Oracle Corporation’s acquisition of NetSuite, Inc., and after trying unsuccessfully to settle those claims, Oracle’s Special Litigation Committee (“SLC”) agreed that permitting a derivative plaintiff to pursue those claims was in Oracle’s best interests....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
California’s Supreme Court has cut off an area of significant potential exposure for California emp...
Read More >
Horton v. Organogenesis Inc.,C.A. No. 2018-0537-KSJM (Del. Ch. July 22, 2019). Sellers in merger ag...
Read More >
Key Points: Illinois amended the Equal Pay Act to protect job applicants by banning inquiries into ...
Read More >
Last summer, after a decade of fits and starts, and just minutes before the end of the 2018 legislat...
Read More >
In In re Mindbody, Inc. Stockholders Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery declined to dismiss ...
Read More >
Key Takeaways The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), with the support of the Antitrust Division of the ...
Read More >