21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Today we share our conversation with Haley Altman, founder and CEO of Doxly, which was recently acqu...
Read More >
While courts have generally interpreted the New York City Human Rights Law (NYCHRL) as providing ant...
Read More >
In a recent installment of the Capital Markets Series, I joined Jon Campagna, CFO of Virgin Galactic...
Read More >
In yet another end-of-2019 decision overruling significant NLRA precedent, the Board reverted to the...
Read More >
In this episode Jonathan Armstrong and Tom Fox are back to discuss issues relating to data privacy, ...
Read More >
Under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), health care providers can file legal ...
Read More >