21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
To combat historical imbalances in pay of women and minorities, New Jersey recently passed a bill am...
Read More >
On August 21, 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Faludi v. U...
Read More >
Opportunities abound for dealmakers who can navigate the ever-changing global life sciences deal lan...
Read More >
Every time I’ve spoken to other plan providers about sure things they are working on, all I later s...
Read More >
A workers’ compensation arbitration decision was recently filed in what appears to be the first tim...
Read More >
On August 7, 2019, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigation...
Read More >