21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
The Americans with Disabilities Act prohibits discrimination against employees because of their asso...
Read More >
On July 23, 2020, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, applying Florida law, looked beyond an oper...
Read More >
The Fed sought to reassure markets for the foreseeable future on Wednesday by announcing that it pla...
Read More >
CONVERGE19 is in its 4th year of bringing together the world’s leading companies for 2 days of dyna...
Read More >
Welcome to your weekly update from the Allen & Overy Pensions team, bringing you up to spee?d on the...
Read More >
The Employee Benefits Practice is pleased to present the Employee Benefits Developments Newsletter f...
Read More >