21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
Oregon has joined a growing number of states to require employers to provide their workers paid fami...
Read More >
Before the coronavirus hit, the real estate industry was riding an all-time high. Global CRE investm...
Read More >
In many states, the implied warranties of workmanship and habitability automatically attach to contr...
Read More >
In the March 2020 Visa Bulletin issued by the US Department of State, EB-2 worldwide employment-base...
Read More >
The Payroll Protection Program has been a lifesaver to many businesses this year, but its quick roll...
Read More >
You have received a citation from the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) and m...
Read More >