21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
As the holiday season approaches, it is a good time for employers to review their policies and take ...
Read More >
On 16 October 2020, the English Court of Appeal delivered judgment in DB Symmetry v Swindon Borough ...
Read More >
The end of the year brought many changes to the labor law. What’s new for employers? We present par...
Read More >
This year has seen its fair share of change, and the same is true for antitrust laws impacting the h...
Read More >
McDermott was delighted to partner with the BVCA (British Venture Capital Association) on its recent...
Read More >
Note From the Editors - With this Summer 2020 issue of Vital Signs, we take a moment to again appl...
Read More >