21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
If 2018 was a year of elevator music at the National Labor Relations Board, 2019 was symphony of sou...
Read More >
The New Jersey Supreme Court just agreed to review whether the “good faith” defense is available t...
Read More >
Technology dealmaking has continued apace in 2020 as M&A investors take advantage of the sector’s r...
Read More >
COVID-19 has financially stressed the U.S. healthcare system in several ways. In many cities, hospit...
Read More >
The recently announced dispute between BorgWarner Inc. and Delphi Technologies PLC relating to BorgW...
Read More >
By now you have probably seen a number of articles about the SECURE Act (Setting Every Community Up ...
Read More >