21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
California Assembly Member Lorena Gonzalez recently amended AB 3075 to impose successor liability fo...
Read More >
2020 is upon us, and with it, a slew of new employment laws that are now in effect. Read on for a de...
Read More >
On July 3, 2019, California governor Gavin Newsom signed the Crown Act into law, making California t...
Read More >
Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini provided insight on a case involving a plaintiff’s reque...
Read More >
On June 15, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in favor of an amicus brief filed back in December 20...
Read More >
Compliance into the Weeds is the only weekly podcast which takes a deep dive into a compliance relat...
Read More >