21Aug
Chancery Orders Trial to Determine Meaning of Ambiguous Post-Closing Covenants in a Stock Purchase Agreement
Schneider Nat’l Carriers, Inc. v. Kuntz, C.A. No. 2017-0711-PAF (Del. Ch. July 16, 2020) - If parties to a contract offer reasonable but conflicting interpretations of ambiguous contractual language, the Court of Chancery may deny summary judgment and order trial for purposes of weighing conflicting extrinsic evidence and witness testimony to interpret the meaning of the contractual language....
By:
Morris James LLP
Related
In April 2019, OFCCP Proposed six Scheduling Letters. Four of these were new altogether: - Section...
Read More >
Mark your calendar and join fellow friends of employee ownership for a series of interactive discuss...
Read More >
On April 30, 2018, the California courts rocked the State’s labor and employment landscape with the...
Read More >
As we have written here, the day before California’s controversial AB 5 was set to go into effect, ...
Read More >
One month after the State of Minnesota’s Wage Theft Statute went into effect, the Minneapolis City ...
Read More >
During the coronavirus pandemic, it seems that the rules for employers are changing every day as fed...
Read More >