X
13Aug

Fee-Shifting Provision in Stockholders Agreement Does Not Violate Delaware Law

Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc. considered whether a “loser pays” fee-shifting provision in a stockholders’ agreement violated Delaware law.  In 2008, the Petitioners had all held stock in a prior entity, Authentix, Inc....
By: Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fee-shifting-provision-in-stockholders-10811/

Related

Does Pennsylvania Recognize Strict Liability Claims Against Medical Device Manufacturers? A Pennsylvania federal court calls the question.

For at least two decades, Pennsylvania law has recognized an exemption from strict liability for pre...

Read More >

New Jersey Passes Landmark Anti-Wage Theft Law

Seyfarth Synopsis: On August 6, 2019, Acting New Jersey Governor Sheila Oliver signed into law A-290...

Read More >

Even Unintentional Disability Discrimination Is Actionable In California

In a decision that may lead employers to feel a little less gratified on Thanksgiving Day, a Califor...

Read More >

FTC Lowers Interlocking Directorate Thresholds for 2021

Along with the HSR filing thresholds, the Federal Trade Commission recently lowered the interlocking...

Read More >

Pensions: DC trustee agenda update - October 2019

Welcome to our monthly update on current legal issues for trustees of DC pension schemes, designed t...

Read More >

Salary History Ban Spreads—New Jersey and New York Jump on Board!

New Jersey and New York are the latest states to prohibit employers from asking job applicants about...

Read More >