X
13Aug

Fee-Shifting Provision in Stockholders Agreement Does Not Violate Delaware Law

Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc. considered whether a “loser pays” fee-shifting provision in a stockholders’ agreement violated Delaware law.  In 2008, the Petitioners had all held stock in a prior entity, Authentix, Inc....
By: Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fee-shifting-provision-in-stockholders-10811/

Related

An Employer's Deposition Disaster

Don't take "don't guess" too literally. One bit of very standard advice that all attorneys give to ...

Read More >

The 401(k) Plan Provisions That Can Land You In Harm’s Way

When setting up a 401(k) plan document as a plan sponsor, you have a lot of choices in plan provisio...

Read More >

GASB Requires Public Entities to Make Room in the Debt Column for Availability Payment-Based P3 Projects

For those interested in availability payment (AP) or service payment structures for public-private p...

Read More >

Obscure But Important Surety and Guarantee Rules

Texas surety law contains obscure procedural rules that can have outsized consequences. Chapter 43 o...

Read More >

Appeals Court Rejects Disability Discrimination Claim Of Employee With Supervisor-Induced Stress And Migraines

When an employee requests an accommodation or asserts a claim under the Americans with Disabilities ...

Read More >

German Tech Sector Increasingly Attractive for M&A and PE Investment

With virtual connectivity on the rise, the tech industry has seen an increase in dual- and tri-track...

Read More >