X
13Aug

Fee-Shifting Provision in Stockholders Agreement Does Not Violate Delaware Law

Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc. considered whether a “loser pays” fee-shifting provision in a stockholders’ agreement violated Delaware law.  In 2008, the Petitioners had all held stock in a prior entity, Authentix, Inc....
By: Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fee-shifting-provision-in-stockholders-10811/

Related

Commercial Division Recognizes Successor Liability as Separate Cause of Action, Not Just a Theory of Liability

“Successor liability”, is it a theory or distinct claim or cause of action? In a recent decision, ...

Read More >

How the New No-Fault Law Affects The Michigan Catastrophic Insurance Fund

Catastrophically injured car crash victims are concerned about how the new, rushed, and poorly draft...

Read More >

Plaintiff Attorney Fees In FLSA Cases: The Frustrating, Driving Force In These Cases

I read a very interesting article in the Epstein Becker Wage & Hour Defense Blog, whose sentiments I...

Read More >

A Feel-Good Story About Social Media!

DOL official gets his job back. It's not often that I'm able to use the U.S. Department of Labor as...

Read More >

IRS Finds Uncashed Retirement Plan Distribution Checks To Be Taxable

Retirement plan administrators can run into issues with uncashed distribution checks, most often whe...

Read More >

Corporate E-Note - October 2019

In an article published in the September 2019 issue of DRI's For The Defense magazine, Ricardo Woods...

Read More >