X
13Aug

Fee-Shifting Provision in Stockholders Agreement Does Not Violate Delaware Law

Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc. considered whether a “loser pays” fee-shifting provision in a stockholders’ agreement violated Delaware law.  In 2008, the Petitioners had all held stock in a prior entity, Authentix, Inc....
By: Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/fee-shifting-provision-in-stockholders-10811/

Related

Oregon’s Workplace Fairness Act Means Major Changes for Oregon Employers

Oregon’s Legislature just enacted the most significant legislation for Oregon employers in years. T...

Read More >

Federal Court Rejects Assembly Bill 51

Assembly Bill 51 (“AB 51”) prohibits employers from requiring employees to execute arbitration agr...

Read More >

NAD Recommends Improvements to Baby Monitor Performance Disclosures

Owlet Baby Care, Inc. advertised its “Smart Sock” baby monitor with prominent claims that the moni...

Read More >

Has #MeToo Created a New Claim of Male-Bias Discrimination?

Often—and without much thinking—when an employer faces a claim of sexual harassment, the knee-jerk...

Read More >

PACTE Act: delegations regarding mergers and other restructuring operations

Presented as a flagship measure of economic reform, the law on growth and business transformation, k...

Read More >

Competition and Restrictive Practices Law Summer News

Summer 2020 was characterized by two significant news items: one in the area of merger control and t...

Read More >