13Aug
Fee-Shifting Provision in Stockholders Agreement Does Not Violate Delaware Law
Manti Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Authentix Acquisition Company, Inc. considered whether a “loser pays” fee-shifting provision in a stockholders’ agreement violated Delaware law. In 2008, the Petitioners had all held stock in a prior entity, Authentix, Inc....
By:
Stinson - Corporate & Securities Law Blog
Related
Philadelphia’s journey toward a $15-an-hour minimum wage began last week, part of an increasingly c...
Read More >
The Australian government has introduced the most significant reforms to Australia’s foreign invest...
Read More >
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, in U.S. Army Corps of Engineers v. John C. Grimbe...
Read More >
In a market with soaring multiples, private equity buyers are increasingly on the hunt to mitigate h...
Read More >
Shelter-in-Place (SIP) - A Shelter-in-Place order means just that, stay and shelter in the place you...
Read More >
A sales employee suffers from acute stress and anxiety, which ultimately force him to take a 12-week...
Read More >