X
22Jul

Hawaii District Court Compels Arbitration of Only Part of a Claim Where There Was a Clear Agreement to Arbitrate

Carlton Fields | | Return|
In this matter, plaintiff Marisco Ltd. hired defendant GL Engineering & Construction (GL E&C) to construct and deliver a floating dry dock. Marisco alleged that GL E&C’s principals misrepresented their experience and ability with respect to constructing dry docks, causing GL E&C to deliver the dry dock late......
By: Carlton Fields
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/hawaii-district-court-compels-49328/

Related

Independent Sponsor Spotlight: Matthew Pettit of Seven Hills Capital

The interview below is part of a new series from McGuireWoods that features interviews with impressi...

Read More >

23 tips for drafting employment arbitration agreements

In light of a critical U.S. Supreme Court decision affecting an employer’s ability to enforce emplo...

Read More >

An Urban Renewal Project Agreement Is Not Transferrable

In urban renewal projects, residents or owner’s rights holders select the company with whom they ar...

Read More >

Illinois District Court Denies Certification of ADA Claims in Airplane Mechanic Case

It’s been awhile since we’ve addressed attempts at bringing class action disability claims (Septem...

Read More >

New Jersey Begins Re-Opening Process

As the rate of reported new COVID-19 cases in New Jersey continues to decline, Governor Murphy has b...

Read More >

Passage of Time Defeats North Carolina Employer Retaliation Claim

North Carolina’s Retaliatory Employment Discrimination Act (REDA) prohibits employers from taking r...

Read More >