X
07Jul

EU merger judicial review: where are we now after 02/Three?

For almost as long as EU merger control has existed, scholars and practitioners have discussed and debated the European Commission’s (EC) split roles as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). It wasn’t until the EU courts overturned three EC prohibition decisions due to manifest errors in assessment in the early 2000s that the discussion shifted to the undeniable need for reform....
By: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-merger-judicial-review-where-are-we-34863/

Related

DHS High-Pressure Activities Continue

The Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) has sent an unpreceden...

Read More >

EEOC Extends Collection Period for EEO-1 Component 2 Data

A few weeks ago, I wrote about the EEO-1 Component 2 2017 and 2018 data submission deadline on Septe...

Read More >

[Webinar] 2019 Employment Legislation Summary: What Employers Need to Know - July 10th, 12:00pm ET

In its 2019 session, the Connecticut General Assembly passed a number of new laws affecting employer...

Read More >

SEC Adopts Final ETF Rule to Streamline and Ease Product Development

On September 26, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted a new rule to modern...

Read More >

Free Speech or Belligerence? NLRB Reassessing the Threshold for When Otherwise Protected Activity Crosses the Line

For employees boisterously raising employment-related concerns on behalf of a larger group, when mig...

Read More >

Defence + Indemnity - August 2019: Case Summary: Sound Stage Entertainment Inc. v Burns

The Contributory Negligence Act of Saskatchewan only provides for apportioning damages among co-tort...

Read More >