X
07Jul

EU merger judicial review: where are we now after 02/Three?

For almost as long as EU merger control has existed, scholars and practitioners have discussed and debated the European Commission’s (EC) split roles as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). It wasn’t until the EU courts overturned three EC prohibition decisions due to manifest errors in assessment in the early 2000s that the discussion shifted to the undeniable need for reform....
By: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-merger-judicial-review-where-are-we-34863/

Related

How the Defense in Evonik/PeroxyChem and T-Mobile/Sprint Successfully Litigated the Fix

In 2020, the defense side ended a 15-year drought in litigating the fix. When the U.S. antitrust aut...

Read More >

Plaintiffs’ Bar Seeks to Expand Reach of California’s Dynamex Decision and ABC Test to Franchising, Joint Employment

The battle over the scope and applicability of the so-called “ABC test” in determining California ...

Read More >

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Appraisal Ruling Relying On Unaffected Market Price To Determine Fair Value

On July 9, 2020, in an en banc opinion authored by Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz, Jr., the Delaware...

Read More >

5 Key Trends In Workplace Class Action Litigation For 2019: Trend #1 Class Certification Trends In 2019

Seyfarth Synopsis: As detailed in our 2020 Workplace Class Action Litigation Report, 2019 was an int...

Read More >

Hot Topics for Startup Employers

Employers today face constant hurdles in their day-to-day operations, and startups are no different....

Read More >

Employers Must Continue Using Current Form I-9 Beyond August 31 Expiration Date

Yesterday, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services issued an alert directing employers to continue...

Read More >