X
07Jul

EU merger judicial review: where are we now after 02/Three?

For almost as long as EU merger control has existed, scholars and practitioners have discussed and debated the European Commission’s (EC) split roles as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). It wasn’t until the EU courts overturned three EC prohibition decisions due to manifest errors in assessment in the early 2000s that the discussion shifted to the undeniable need for reform....
By: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-merger-judicial-review-where-are-we-34863/

Related

Court Strikes Down New York Anti-Arbitration Provisions

As we reported, New York State has enacted laws prohibiting mandatory arbitration of sexual harassme...

Read More >

Labor Department Offers Employers Some FLSA Clarity Through New “Regular Rate” Interpretation

For the first time in over 60 years, the U.S. Department of Labor today issued a final rule updating...

Read More >

Pick Your Procedure: EEOC Launches Parallel Gender Discrimination Pay Suits Under Different Statutes

The EEOC has been no stranger to headlines in recent months, particularly on the issue of equal pay....

Read More >

Sustainable Development and Land Use Update - September 2020 #1

Bid to allow duplexes on most California lots fails after Assembly approval comes too late...Califor...

Read More >

NLRB: Employers Win When Their Employees Can’t “Opt-In”

In the first post-Epic Systems decision regarding arbitration agreements, the NLRB has underscored j...

Read More >

NLRB Issues Proposed Rule to Scale Back 2014 Expedited Election Rules

The National Labor Relations Board (“Board” or “NLRB”) has announced that it is publishing propo...

Read More >