X
07Jul

EU merger judicial review: where are we now after 02/Three?

For almost as long as EU merger control has existed, scholars and practitioners have discussed and debated the European Commission’s (EC) split roles as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). It wasn’t until the EU courts overturned three EC prohibition decisions due to manifest errors in assessment in the early 2000s that the discussion shifted to the undeniable need for reform....
By: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-merger-judicial-review-where-are-we-34863/

Related

New measures to protect UK life sciences businesses from foreign takeovers

As of 23 June, the UK government can scrutinize certain foreign takeovers and other acquisitions to ...

Read More >

Trump's Proposed NEPA Regulations Likely to Face Legal Challenge

The Trump Administration recently proposed amendments to the regulations implementing the National E...

Read More >

USCIS Announces Fiscal Year 2019 Statistics And Accomplishments

In a press release issued on October 16, 2019, Ken Cuccinelli, the acting director of the U.S. Citiz...

Read More >

Faithless Fiduciaries: Broader Relief In Fraud Cases Involving Real Estate Transactions

On Friday, the First District attempted to resolve a split of authority among California’s appellat...

Read More >

Global M&A stages rebound in Q3 2020

After deal activity stagnated in H1, the third quarter offers some hope for dealmakers, as deal volu...

Read More >

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Ninth Circuit Reverses Award of Attorneys' Fees

In Gorbacheva v. Abbott Laboratories Extended Disability Plan, et al., 29 U.S. App. LEXIS 36542 (N.D...

Read More >