X
07Jul

EU merger judicial review: where are we now after 02/Three?

For almost as long as EU merger control has existed, scholars and practitioners have discussed and debated the European Commission’s (EC) split roles as investigator, prosecutor, judge, and jury under the EU Merger Regulation (EUMR). It wasn’t until the EU courts overturned three EC prohibition decisions due to manifest errors in assessment in the early 2000s that the discussion shifted to the undeniable need for reform....
By: Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/eu-merger-judicial-review-where-are-we-34863/

Related

Court Sheds Light on ERISA’s Fiduciary Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege

A federal district court in Ohio recently attempted to shed some light on when internal communicatio...

Read More >

Standard to Determine FLSA Joint Employer Status Revised Under Department of Labor's Recently Adopted Final Rule

The Department of Labor (DOL) adopted a final rule on January 12, 2020, to revise and update its Par...

Read More >

Canada’s Federal Election: What Employers Need to Know About Employee Time Off to Vote

Canadians are headed to the polls for a general election on October 21, 2019. As is the case with pr...

Read More >

In Continued Effort to Flatten the Curve, Governor Murphy's Executive Order 122 Places Restrictions on Non-Essential Construction

In light of the coronavirus pandemic, on April 8, 2020, Governor Murphy issued (“Order”), which i...

Read More >

California Legislature Scrambles to Amend AB 5, The Independent Contractor Disaster

Assembly Bill 5 became effective on January 1, 2020. The law purports to prevent the misclassificati...

Read More >

The NLRB Permits Employers to Impose Confidentiality Requirements in Ongoing Workplace Investigations

On Dec. 17, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that confidentiality mandates durin...

Read More >