13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Six Bay Area counties and the city of Berkeley officially announced an extension of the regional COV...
Read More >
The general duty clause of the Occupational Safety and Health Act requires employers to provide a wo...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board‘s (“NLRB”) “joint employer” test has had tremendous implicat...
Read More >
Harkening back to the “Blacklists” imposed by the Obama administration, Dr. David Michaels, former...
Read More >
On January 7, 2020, the U.S. Department of Labor published three new opinion letters – two that add...
Read More >
In December 2019, U.S. lawmakers passed the SECURE (Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhanc...
Read More >