13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
The New Jersey Legislature appears poised to pass S67, the Portable Benefits Act for Independent Con...
Read More >
The DC City Council has proposed two bills intended to make it easier for condominium associations a...
Read More >
The diminution of an employee’s duties can constitute an adverse employment action in violation of ...
Read More >
In a recent published decision, the California Court of Appeal had the opportunity to address this i...
Read More >
U.S. antitrust enforcers continue to seek stiff penalties from companies that commit “gun jumping”...
Read More >
In this episode I visit with podcast favorite Jim Murphy, who is the VP of Products at Hanzo. We dis...
Read More >