13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
On August 14, 2020, for the first time in roughly six years, the US Department of Justice (DOJ) issu...
Read More >
In the first trial of its kind in North Carolina, the North Carolina Business Court has determined t...
Read More >
Under the title “New York May Soon Increase Recoverable Wrongful Death Damages,” we wrote recently...
Read More >
Putting an end to employees’ backdoor attempts to recover unpaid wages in Private Attorneys General...
Read More >
On December 30, 2019, a federal judge in the Eastern District of California entered an order tempora...
Read More >
A controversial bill passed by the California legislative assembly's preliminary vote on September 1...
Read More >