X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Automatic Severance and Additional Notice: The Expanding Obligations For Employers Under New Jersey’s New WARN ACT

Effective July 19, 2020, pursuant to new legislation signed by New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy on Ja...

Read More >

FTC Announces 2021 Thresholds for Merger Control Filings under HSR Act and Interlocking Directorates under the Clayton Act

For the first time since 2010, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) has decreased the dollar juris...

Read More >

Breaking News! New Court Order Bans the Ban on Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements

AB 51 is the California Bill which attempts to ban certain mandatory employment arbitration agreemen...

Read More >

New Ansi Standards for Aerial Work Platforms Coming March 2020

New ANSI standards are going into effect March 1, 2020, for aerial work platforms. It is important t...

Read More >

Labor Board: Unions Waived Right To Bargain Over Changes To Retiree Medical Benefits

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has held that an employer did not violate the National Lab...

Read More >