X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

US DOL Seeks to Clarify Fluctuating Workweek Pay Method

Under the current U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, if certain conditions are met, an empl...

Read More >

Delaware Court of Chancery Addresses Significant Issues Regarding Private Company Deal Litigation

On May 15, 2019, Vice Chancellor Slights of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a ruling addressin...

Read More >

The Broccoli Incident: Making Sure You Ask for What You Want In Construction Claims

Having litigated construction disputes for almost 20 years, the issue of entitlement often turns on ...

Read More >

Breach of Contract Claims Find No Quarter in the Language of Ohio’s Statute of Repose: R.C. § 2305.131 Applies Both Tort and Contract Claims

The Supreme Court of Ohio recently held that R.C. § 2305.131, the real property construction of repo...

Read More >

[Video] DOL Sets Enforcement Records Again - Employment Law This Week® - Trending News

A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Garen Dodge of Epstein ...

Read More >

Can Employers get a Grip on Griping? Not all Gripes are Created Equal…

Negative employee attitudes, chronic complaining, insubordination and gossiping are bad for the work...

Read More >