13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
In this episode of Trekking Through Compliance, we consider the episode A Private Little War which a...
Read More >
Prior to the California Supreme Court’s decision in Wilson vs. Cable News Network, Inc., California...
Read More >
A $6.75 million judgment was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, against a...
Read More >
On 26 July 2019, the Greek Supervisory Authority (SA) found Pricewaterhouse Coopers (“PwC”) not co...
Read More >
The oil and gas industry in the United States is highly dependent upon an intricate set of agreement...
Read More >
While residential and commercial construction is currently considered an essential business activity...
Read More >