X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Don't Condition Return to Work on ‘100 Percent Recovery'

When asked recently about the return of star quarterback Cam Newton, Carolina Panthers coach Ron Riv...

Read More >

Mexico’s Femicide Movement and the March 9 National Stoppage: Guidance for Employers

Recently Mexico has been facing a considerable and seemingly uncontrollable increase in femicide cas...

Read More >

Don’t Keep Your Employees in Suspense

UK employers should proceed with caution when suspending employees, and always consider carefully wh...

Read More >

The NLRB’s Revised Representation Case Procedures, Part II: Elections and Beyond

On December 18, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) published final rules that will take...

Read More >

US DOJ and FTC Propose Vertical Merger Guidelines

The U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Federal Trade Commission published proposed vertical merger ...

Read More >

Flag on the Play for Illegal Procedure: Necessary Parties and the Pitfalls of Nonjoinder

Failure to name a necessary party when challenging a land use determination may result in dismissal,...

Read More >