13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Since 2001, an employer presented with evidence that at least 50 percent of its unionized bargaining...
Read More >
In late November of last year, the Court of Chancery in Delaware handed down a decision in a case ca...
Read More >
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) released the revised thresholds for determin...
Read More >
In a significant decision for employers, a Colorado appellate court recently upheld an employer’s p...
Read More >
On April 28, 2020, the Bureau of Industry and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce (BIS) published ...
Read More >
New Jersey has enacted the “Create a Respectful and Open Workspace for Natural Hair Act” (“CROWN ...
Read More >