13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/
Related
Under the current U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) regulations, if certain conditions are met, an empl...
Read More >
On May 15, 2019, Vice Chancellor Slights of the Delaware Court of Chancery issued a ruling addressin...
Read More >
Having litigated construction disputes for almost 20 years, the issue of entitlement often turns on ...
Read More >
The Supreme Court of Ohio recently held that R.C. § 2305.131, the real property construction of repo...
Read More >
A Trending News interview from Employment Law This Week®, featuring attorney Garen Dodge of Epstein ...
Read More >
Negative employee attitudes, chronic complaining, insubordination and gossiping are bad for the work...
Read More >