13Aug
Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”
Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By:
Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Related
Thanks to the consistent gridlock we have at the congressional level in Washington, D.C., employment...
Read More >
With a recent uptick in mergers and transactions, we thought it would be worthwhile to provide a ref...
Read More >
Late Friday, Governor Lamont vetoed House Bill 5001, which I had highlighted in an earlier post as b...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: A Massachusetts trial court judge ruled that employees were entitled to premium p...
Read More >
Part 2: New Employment-Related Court Decisions Impacting California’s Public and Private Entities -...
Read More >
The Trump Administration recently proposed amendments to the regulations implementing the National E...
Read More >