X
13Aug

Exclusion for Gender Reassignment Surgery May Disadvantage a “Suspect Class”

Seyfarth Synopsis: In Toomey v. U of Arizona, No. 19-35 (D. Ar. June 24, 2019), the Magistrate Judge determined on a motion to dismiss that Title VII does not prohibit discrimination based on a person’s transgender status. However, she decided that...
By: Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/exclusion-for-gender-reassignment-81823/

Related

Salary History Bans and the Illinois Amended Equal Pay Act: What Employers Need to Know Now

The amendments to the Act prohibit Illinois employers and employment agencies from asking job applic...

Read More >

Attorneys Provide Updates on Rapidly Changing Aspects of Employment Law

Several Ward and Smith attorneys provided updates on some of the fastest-changing areas of employmen...

Read More >

NJ Medical Marijuana Laws Expand Employee Protections

Earlier this year, the New Jersey Appellate Division addressed the relationship between the Compassi...

Read More >

CPSC Recall Snapshot: CPSC Agenda and Priorities for Fiscal Years 2020–2021

Welcome to the June edition of the Alston & Bird CPSC Recall Snapshot. In May, the CPSC held its pu...

Read More >

Pennsylvania May Soon Require Employers To Disclose Pay Ranges To Applicants And Employees

The Pennsylvania House of Representatives recently introduced a bill that would amend the commonweal...

Read More >

Third Circuit Finds Multiple Problems With Certification of Off-the-Clock Claims

A recent case from the Third Circuit casts a spotlight on many of the problems inherent in so-called...

Read More >