03Jul
Suit Challenging Interpretation of Tentative Map Conditions Was Not Time-Barred
Nicholas Honchariw’s battles with the County of Stanislaus over his 9-lot subdivision have now resulted in a fourth published appellate decision. (See our prior reports, County Violates California’s Anti-NIMBY Law by Rejecting Housing Project With No Affordable Units; No Affordable Housing, No Attorney’s Fees Under Housing Accountability Act; and If At First You Succeed, Don’t Try, Try, Try Again). In Honchariw IV, the appellate court held that Honchariw’s disagreement with the County’s...
By:
Perkins Coie
Related
With a constantly evolving legal landscape, colleges, universities and independent schools encounter...
Read More >
On Friday, March 13, 2020 the Federal Trade Commission and the Department of Justice Antitrust Divis...
Read More >
Non è raro che nelle vicende societarie ci si possa ritrovare in situazioni di stallo decisionale (c...
Read More >
Investment Company Institute conducted a study that shows that 56% of Defined Contribution plan part...
Read More >
The case of Doosan Enpure Limited v Interserve Construction Limited represents a rare consideration ...
Read More >
On July 19, 2019, the U.S. District Court for the District of Rhode Island granted an employer’s mo...
Read More >