03Jul
Suit Challenging Interpretation of Tentative Map Conditions Was Not Time-Barred
Nicholas Honchariw’s battles with the County of Stanislaus over his 9-lot subdivision have now resulted in a fourth published appellate decision. (See our prior reports, County Violates California’s Anti-NIMBY Law by Rejecting Housing Project With No Affordable Units; No Affordable Housing, No Attorney’s Fees Under Housing Accountability Act; and If At First You Succeed, Don’t Try, Try, Try Again). In Honchariw IV, the appellate court held that Honchariw’s disagreement with the County’s...
By:
Perkins Coie
Related
In follow up to our previous posting regarding the June 11, 2019, delay to the start of the new Mass...
Read More >
Another Future of Work Hearing Scheduled. The House Higher Education and Workforce Development Subco...
Read More >
From our perspective we appear to be experiencing an uptick in the reporting of employees testing po...
Read More >
A recent decision in Edward D. Jones & Co., LP v. John Kerr (S.D.In. 19-cv-03810 Nov. 14, 2019), il...
Read More >
This past week was a busy one for New York State lawmakers. In addition to passing game-changing leg...
Read More >
On Sept. 24, 2019, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) unveiled its final rule to update the Fair Lab...
Read More >