10Aug
Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision
Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
Seyfarth Synopsis: While most employers are likely familiar with the Illinois Biometric Information ...
Read More >
On January 28, 2020, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced revised thresholds for merger noti...
Read More >
In this episode of The Proskauer Brief, partners Harris Mufson and Guy Brenner discuss the coronavir...
Read More >
The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) has issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that inc...
Read More >
The ongoing Scottish case of Serco Limited v Forth Health Limited highlights the difficulties that c...
Read More >
MTA Royalty Corp. v. Compania Minera Pangea, S.A. DE C.V., C.A. No. N19C-11-228 AML CCLD (Del. Supe...
Read More >