X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

Stop Work Orders and Construction Project Site Abandonment Series: Part 1 – Stop Work Orders

As the Novel-Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) continues to cause disruption to every aspect of society, th...

Read More >

Premises Liability: Comparative Negligence Is Not a Defense in Child Trespasser Case

In a premises liability action, the duty a landowner owes depends on the status assigned to the pers...

Read More >

MSHA Conducts Denver Stakeholders’ Meeting on Workplace Examinations

On Thursday, November 15, 2019, the Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) held the fourth...

Read More >

Meat Alternative Company Starts Beef With Arkansas State Law

Where’s the beef? In Arkansas federal court, where the Tofurky Company challenged a new state law t...

Read More >

NLRB Restricts Employee Use of Employer-Provided Email for Section 7 Purposes

Earlier this week, the National Labor Relations Board ("Board") issued an important decision, return...

Read More >

Is California Threatening Director Independence?

Publicly traded companies need to know whether a director qualifies as "independent" for a variety o...

Read More >