10Aug
Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision
Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/
Related
The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation released its Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report and, you guesse...
Read More >
In 2014, the National Labor Relations Board adopted regulations that considerably shortened the time...
Read More >
Antitrust regulators in the United States and Europe were very active in the final quarter of 2019. ...
Read More >
In resolving a growing split among California courts, the California Supreme Court in ZB, N.A. v. Su...
Read More >
Competition/antitrust laws generally require rival firms to operate on the market independently of e...
Read More >
With KPMG in the news for one of the biggest ethical trainwrecks in recent memory (or since the last...
Read More >