X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

PBGC Report Reminds Manufacturers of the Coming Threat

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation released its Fiscal Year 2019 Annual Report and, you guesse...

Read More >

NLRB Relaxes Obama-Era Rules on Union Election Timetable

In 2014, the National Labor Relations Board adopted regulations that considerably shortened the time...

Read More >

Antitrust M&A Snapshot - February 2020

Antitrust regulators in the United States and Europe were very active in the final quarter of 2019. ...

Read More >

CA Supreme Court: Employees Cannot Bring Claims for Unpaid Wages Under PAGA

In resolving a growing split among California courts, the California Supreme Court in ZB, N.A. v. Su...

Read More >

Better together – How far can competitors go under UK competition law in cooperating to deal with the challenges of the COVID-19 crisis?

Competition/antitrust laws generally require rival firms to operate on the market independently of e...

Read More >

[Video] This Week in FCPA-Episode 159, week ending June 21, 2019 – the KPMG Trainwreck and Walmart Settles

With KPMG in the news for one of the biggest ethical trainwrecks in recent memory (or since the last...

Read More >