X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

2020 Annual Updates to the United States Pre-Merger Notification (HSR) and Interlocking Directorates Thresholds

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has revised the thresholds that govern pre-merger notification re...

Read More >

Illinois Appellate Court finds Building Contractor is Without Legal Capacity to Bring Counterclaims 3 1/2 years after Dissolution

The Illinois Limited Liability Company Act (Act) permits an LLC to continue after dissolution solely...

Read More >

Changes To Buy American Policies

Strengthening Buy American statutes have been a rare area of bipartisan agreement in the current fra...

Read More >

Court Recognizes Day-to-Day Changes Are Compensable Despite Contractual Waivers

It happens all the time! The owner-contractor agreement contains a “no damages for delay” clause; ...

Read More >

What a Business Should Know Before Triggering a MAC Clause Based on COVID-19

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a sudden disruption to businesses and halted almost all forms of gl...

Read More >

Are Efforts to Speed Up Antitrust Merger Reviews Working?

Last September, Makan Delrahim, the Assistant Attorney General for the Antitrust Division of the Dep...

Read More >