X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

[Video] Legal Minute: Contractor Misclassification

Labor and Employment attorneys Linda Auerbach Allderdice and Michael Maroney break down independent ...

Read More >

Nullity of penalty clauses in employment relationships

Individual employment agreements cannot provide for penalty clauses for the breach of the employees’...

Read More >

COVID-19 Impacts on the Copyright Office: What Does It Mean for Mergers and Acquisitions?

Like much of the federal government, the U.S. Copyright Office (the “Office”) is adjusting its pra...

Read More >

Vaped and Confused

E-cigarettes have vaulted to the front pages lately, and for tragic reasons.  To date, at least six ...

Read More >

NLRB Gives Employers Greater Discretion to Limit Union Activity on Their Premises

The National Labor Relations Board (the “Board”) recently issued a decision in UPMC Presbyterian S...

Read More >

10 Things For Which This Employment Lawyer Is Thankful In 2019

"It could have been worse" edition. This year was kind of meh from an employment law standpoint. Bu...

Read More >