X
10Aug

Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision

Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/superior-court-addresses-whether-the-30426/

Related

Is AI Face-Scanning the Next “Big Thing” in Hiring Practices? Um, It’s Already Here

In just a few weeks, I’ll be speaking at the CBIA’s Employment Law Conference on the topic of “Ar...

Read More >

Antitrust Counseling in the Pandemic Economy: Six Trends to Watch

The coronavirus pandemic has shocked the global economy, transformed industries, and upended our dai...

Read More >

Mach Group “Mini Tender” Offer to Buy Montreal-Based Airline Won’t Fly: Quebec Financial Markets Tribunal

On August 11, 2019, Quebec’s financial markets administrative tribunal (TAMF), by a majority decisi...

Read More >

[Video] Compliance Man Chooses the Target-Episode 6: Due Diligence in High Risk Markets

Welcome to Episode 6 of Compliance Man Chooses the Target with Tim Khasanov-Batirovseries of podcast...

Read More >

Delaware Court Again Finds Conflicted Transaction Safe Harbors Not So Safe

Limited partnerships and limited liability companies, as creatures of contract, often have in their ...

Read More >