10Aug
Superior Court Addresses Whether the Plaintiff Is the “Master of the Claim” in Post-Tincher Decision
Since the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania decided Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc., 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014), parties proceeding in product liability cases in Pennsylvania often disagree about jury instructions. In Davis v. Volkswagen Grp. of Am., No. 1405...
By:
White and Williams LLP
Related
On January 31, 2020, U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) announced the release of a new ...
Read More >
In its recent ruling in the case of Ewart v. The University of Oxford, the Employment Tribunal (ET) ...
Read More >
After a lengthy journey through the Pennsylvania legal system, the City of Pittsburgh’s Paid Sick D...
Read More >
Relief from the burdens and threat of litigation from plaintiffs’ attorneys under the Missouri Merc...
Read More >
Since the early days of the COVID-19 crisis in the U.S., it has been a recurring theme to turn on th...
Read More >
In December 2018, a new decree expanded the scope of the French national security review, especially...
Read More >