X
01Aug

New Jersey Federal Court Examines And Applies The “j.(5)” Ongoing Operations Exclusion

In PJR Construction of N.J. v. Valley Forge Insurance Company, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127973 (D.N.J. July 31, 2019) (PJR Construction), a New Jersey federal court held that the “j.(5)” “Ongoing Operations Exclusion” applied to bar coverage for...
By: White and Williams LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/new-jersey-federal-court-examines-and-19420/

Related

Changes to Minnesota Laws Affecting Construction

In the 2019 session, the Minnesota Legislature introduced a number of sweeping changes to statutes a...

Read More >

Read This Now: New York’s Groundbreaking Sexual Harassment Legislation

Clichés like “seismic shift” and “paradigm change” do not begin to describe just how profoundly ...

Read More >

Bisconti Farms, Inc. and Bisconti Management, Inc. to Pay $200,000 to Settle EEOC Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Suit

Female Manager and Two Female Employees at Mushroom Farm Sexually Harassed Multiple Female Workers, ...

Read More >

The NY Court of Appeals Addresses “Optional Safety Equipment” in Fasolas v. Bobcat of N.Y., Inc.

In products liability litigation, the question of whether a product was defectively designed because...

Read More >

EEOC Joins in the Holiday Festivities by Adding Proposed Joint-Employer Rulemaking to its ‘To Do’ List

In mid-November, the Trump administration published its fall agenda. Of interest to employers, that ...

Read More >

Pondering One of Diligence’s Seemingly Imponderable Questions: The Effect of Restrictions on “Indirect” Transfers

There are few things more basic to the legal due diligence of a target company than determining whet...

Read More >