05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
Employees of cannabis companies have the same rights as workers who are employed by any other entity...
Read More >
Indemnification clauses are ubiquitous in commercial agreements of all types. In the M&A context, in...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: This week, New York state expanded a state Equal Pay Act, making it illegal to pa...
Read More >
To much fanfare and the great excitement of many employment lawyers, the UK Supreme Court recently d...
Read More >
According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), approximately 40 ...
Read More >
The IRS’s informal FAQs provide comfort that an acquirer, including affiliated companies treated as...
Read More >