X
05Jun

What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured

Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By: Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/what-a-difference-a-word-makes-any-28378/

Related

4th Circuit Vacates ARB SOX Whistleblower Decision for Lack of Protected Activity

On June 13, 2019, the Fourth Circuit overturned the ARB’s decision in favor of a complainant, rulin...

Read More >

The big problem with an ancillary line of business

As a plan provider, it makes sense to create an ancillary line of business if it’s a natural carryo...

Read More >

Something Old, Something New and Something Borrowed in Latest DOL Process Agreement

On the same day that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) filed a lawsuit against the Farmers National...

Read More >

U.S. Employers Weigh EEOC Guidance in Responding to Coronavirus

As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread, U.S. employers considering taking pr...

Read More >

Proposed Changes to Stock Option Tax Rules

On June 17, 2019, Canada’s finance minister tabled a Notice of Ways and Means Motion regarding the ...

Read More >

Seven Steps to Address Trade Secret Misappropriation by Whistleblowers

“The immunity provision of the Defend Trade Secrets Act creates serious risk for companies: A whist...

Read More >