05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
Last week, in Frlekin v. Apple, Inc., the California Supreme Court held that employee exit searches ...
Read More >
The 2019 legal landscape of employee mobility continues to evolve, at times drastically. Courts and ...
Read More >
The U.S. Renewable Energy Industry, including its construction market, like every sector of the econ...
Read More >
Maine, Maryland, New Hampshire, Washington and Rhode Island have recently joined the growing ranks o...
Read More >
A federal court on Tuesday denied the FTC’s request to enjoin the merger of Thomas Jefferson Univer...
Read More >
Continuing its independent program of workplace regulations, Minneapolis has enacted its own wage th...
Read More >