05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
The frontiers of ERISA litigation keep expanding, and defined benefit plans are the new litigation t...
Read More >
The definition earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and adjus...
Read More >
The autumn leaves are turning, football season is gathering momentum, Congress is reconvening, and a...
Read More >
As the world faces up to the challenges posed by the spread of COVID-19, clients have started asking...
Read More >
Employer Failed to Address Racially Hostile Work Environment, Federal Agency Charged - NEW YORK,...
Read More >
On November 22, 2019 the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) announced that it had filed a p...
Read More >