05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
The debate has raged for years. Is there a six-foot rule triggering fall protection requirements whe...
Read More >
Employers will now be responsible for determining the employment status of independent contractors i...
Read More >
Under the leadership of Craig Leen, OFCCP has made a renewed commitment to providing technical assis...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Earlier yesterday, the Department of Family and Medical Leave (DFML) issued its f...
Read More >
In Shareholder Representative Services LLC v. RSI Holdco, LLC, No. 2018-0517-KSJM, 2019 WL 2290916 (...
Read More >
First off, let me dispense with the elephant in the room — Yes, the show “Survivor” is still on t...
Read More >