05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
Effectively drafted restrictive covenants are valuable tools employers can utilize to protect their ...
Read More >
A federal court in Nebraska recently rejected a health plan’s fiduciary breach claims under the Emp...
Read More >
A Federal District Court in New York recently fielded the issue of whether there is such a thing as ...
Read More >
Restructurings and uncertainty are hitting the US consumer sector. Retail M&A deal volume dropped 11...
Read More >
Assessing whether to terminate an employee and how best to deliver the news are challenges every emp...
Read More >
Company Resolves Failure-to-Hire Racial Discrimination Charge - LOS ANGELES - Pier 1 Imports, an i...
Read More >