05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
In the past 35 years, it changed on who had to take out a required minimum distribution (RMD) from a...
Read More >
On May 13, 2020, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy issued Executive Order 142 , which allows for the r...
Read More >
The landscape of statewide executive orders that affect construction continues to change throughout ...
Read More >
In response to complaints from the trucking industry, on August 14 the federal Department of Transpo...
Read More >
Though the coronavirus has yet to reach Israel (as of this writing), the labor market is already pre...
Read More >
Joining the other federal appellate panels to consider the issue, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the ...
Read More >