05Jun
What a Difference a Word Makes: "Any Insured" Cross Liability Exclusion Bars Coverage for Lawsuit Against Additional Insured
Based on the policy's use of the term "any insured" instead of "the insured" in a cross liability exclusion, a Massachusetts appeals court recently ruled that an additional insured contractor was not entitled to coverage under its subcontractor's...
By:
Hinshaw & Culbertson - Insights for Insurers
Related
Quick Hit: On June 28, 2019 The Office of Management and Budget (“OMB”) published notice that “OF...
Read More >
On April 30, 2018, the California courts rocked the State’s labor and employment landscape with the...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Reversing course and overruling previous precedent, the Court of Appeals for the ...
Read More >
As the number of confirmed coronavirus (COVID-19) cases and related business disruptions continue to...
Read More >
On 2 November 2020, Indonesia’s Law on Job Creation went into effect. The Law, amends or revokes o...
Read More >
In part 3 of our journey through SALT issues in M&A transactions, Matt Hunsaker highlights a few app...
Read More >