X
16Jul

Blurring the Lines: Dolan v. Altice Demonstrates the Potentially Unexpected and Significant Impact that “Boilerplate” Provisions Can Have on Merger Agreement Interpretation

In a recent decision arising out of the sale of Cablevision, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued important guidance regarding the interplay between what are commonly regarded as boilerplate merger agreement provisions and “bespoke” provisions that...
By: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/blurring-the-lines-dolan-v-altice-95321/

Related

The SECURE Act: How It Will Affect Your Clients

The most impactful legislation affecting retirement accounts in decades became effective on January ...

Read More >

In Alabama, Not All Debts Are Created Equal

Alabama’s materialman’s lien statute (specifically, Ala. Code § 35-11-211) was intended to provide...

Read More >

DOJ Revisions to Corporate Compliance Guidance: Training, Third-Party Risk Management, Mergers/Acquisitions and Data (Part II of II)

DOJ is catching up to compliance officers and evolving best practices.  Say what you want, DOJ is be...

Read More >

Scope of arbitration agreements: BC Supreme Court decision highlights the importance of defining the scope of an arbitration agreement

The recent decision of the Supreme Court of British Columbia in Octaform Systems Inc v. Clayworth co...

Read More >

Sacramento's Busy Year: What Employers Need To Know

2019 California Legislative Update For Employers - It’s been a busy session for the California Le...

Read More >