16Jul
Blurring the Lines: Dolan v. Altice Demonstrates the Potentially Unexpected and Significant Impact that “Boilerplate” Provisions Can Have on Merger Agreement Interpretation
In a recent decision arising out of the sale of Cablevision, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued important guidance regarding the interplay between what are commonly regarded as boilerplate merger agreement provisions and “bespoke” provisions that...
By:
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Related
On July 3, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) modified the legal framework in which an ...
Read More >
In a significant ruling of first impression, Solera Holdings, Inc. v. XL Specialty Insurance Co. (“...
Read More >
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) published two final rules on Januar...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the California Office of Administrative Law (OAL) announced that it had approved a ...
Read More >
A recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision confirms that, unlike in statutory mergers, the attorne...
Read More >
Successfully executing an acquisition from stress, distress, or insolvency requires a creative appro...
Read More >