X
16Jul

Blurring the Lines: Dolan v. Altice Demonstrates the Potentially Unexpected and Significant Impact that “Boilerplate” Provisions Can Have on Merger Agreement Interpretation

In a recent decision arising out of the sale of Cablevision, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued important guidance regarding the interplay between what are commonly regarded as boilerplate merger agreement provisions and “bespoke” provisions that...
By: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/blurring-the-lines-dolan-v-altice-95321/

Related

Funds and asset management regulatory news, October 2020 # 3

ESMA guidelines on liquidity stress testing in UCITS and AIFs: FCA comment - Among other things co...

Read More >

SDNY Allows Nine West LBO Securities Litigation to Move Forward

In early December, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied, in...

Read More >

Implementing FIRRMA: Highlights from CFIUS’ Final Regulations

On January 13, 2020, the U.S. Treasury Department, as chair of the Committee on Foreign Investment i...

Read More >

California Extends Organ Donor Leave Under AB 1223

Currently, state law mandates private employers with 15 or more employees to provide employees 30 da...

Read More >

"Accent Bias" Plus Ethnic Hostility Can Be Constructive Discharge

"New sheriff" gets employer in trouble. Employers who have departments or units that need to be cle...

Read More >

AMN Healthcare’s impact on the enforceability of non-solicitation provisions in California raises two new unanswered questions

California Employee mobility and the right to compete are sacrosanct in California, and have been si...

Read More >