X
16Jul

Blurring the Lines: Dolan v. Altice Demonstrates the Potentially Unexpected and Significant Impact that “Boilerplate” Provisions Can Have on Merger Agreement Interpretation

In a recent decision arising out of the sale of Cablevision, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued important guidance regarding the interplay between what are commonly regarded as boilerplate merger agreement provisions and “bespoke” provisions that...
By: Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/blurring-the-lines-dolan-v-altice-95321/

Related

Florida 2020 Legislative Session Preview

Florida lawmakers are gearing up for the 2020 session, which begins on Tuesday, January 14th, and ru...

Read More >

A Challenge Regarding the Interpretation of a Project Condition of Approval may be Filed More than 90 Days Following the Project Approval

On June 25, 2020, the Fifth Appellate District decided Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, holding th...

Read More >

The European FDI Regulation: What You Need to Know

The EU Foreign Direct Investment Regulation will be in full force from October 11, 2020. We expect i...

Read More >

Franchisor 101: The Wrong Tools to Avoid California Courts

The Ninth Circuit ruled that a California Matco Tool franchisee, John Fleming, could bring a class a...

Read More >

Far East Square Pte Ltd v Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2019] SGCA 36: Inroad into Dual-Track Regime for Construction Claims?

In Far East Square Pte Ltd v Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd [2019] SGCA 36 (Far East v Yau...

Read More >

Asset acquisitions caught by the Indonesian merger control regime

Speed read - New merger control guidelines in Indonesia provide that asset acquisitions are now tra...

Read More >