13May
Implied terms: Commercial Court refuses to imply term into a commercial agreement requiring a developer to sell a property within a reasonable time to trigger its obligation to pay a fee
Dentons successfully defended a claim against the developer for non-payment of a US$1.12 million fee. The court decided that an agreement requiring payment only on the sale of a property did not contain an implied term requiring the developer to sell...
By:
Dentons
Related
A federal district court in Ohio concluded that internal communications between a plan administrator...
Read More >
On September 26, 2019, California’s Second District Court of Appeals in Gustavo Naranjo, et al. v. ...
Read More >
ZB, N.A. v. Super Ct. of San Diego Cty., 8 Cal. 5th 175, 252 Cal. Rptr. 3d 228 (2019) - Summary: E...
Read More >
Monroe Facility Denied Assembly Operator Reasonable Accommodations and Fired Her, Federal Agency Cha...
Read More >
On November 20, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board’s (NLRB) Office of the General Counsel gra...
Read More >
The coronavirus crisis has made life difficult for Americans on both a personal and work-related lev...
Read More >