04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
As the Novel-Coronavirus (“COVID-19”) continues to cause disruption to every aspect of society, th...
Read More >
In this class action, truckers for Wal-Mart alleged they should have been but were not paid for layo...
Read More >
The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (BWC) recently proposed a 13 percent rate cut in premiums, tota...
Read More >
Minnesota’s wage theft law, which largely went into effect on July 1, 2019, created new documentati...
Read More >
I recently had the opportunity to visit with Michele Edwards, Partner at StoneTurn, to consider som...
Read More >
By refusing to hear an appeal of a decision by a Florida appellate court, the US Supreme Court effec...
Read More >