04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
On January 2, 2020, the Attorney General for the State of California released the title and summary ...
Read More >
On January 1, 2020, the new federal overtime rule takes effect. Other than in states with already-h...
Read More >
Concluding their 2019 legislative sessions, New York and Connecticut adopted sweeping new discrimina...
Read More >
School District Failed to Recall Teacher in Retaliation for His Age Discrimination Complaints Federa...
Read More >
Every company has faced challenges related to the social media presence of, or use by, prospective a...
Read More >
Nearly a decade has passed since the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation (SCI) first report...
Read More >