04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
Joint employment took center stage yesterday during the release of the Fall Regulatory Agenda, as th...
Read More >
I’m sure that everyone knows that Secretary of Labor Alexander Acosta resigned over the controversy...
Read More >
The California legislature and Governor Gavin Newsom considered and ultimately passed a number of si...
Read More >
The California Supreme Court recently issued a decision holding that the time spent on an employer’...
Read More >
Patient Recruiter Convicted in $1.3 Million Kickback Conspiracy Scheme - After a six-day trial, a ...
Read More >
Last year, California enacted AB 5 imposing the so-called A-B-C test for employee status under Calif...
Read More >