04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
On January 16, 2020, the United States Department of Labor (DOL) issued its Final Rule on Joint Empl...
Read More >
From Vaudeville to the Silver Screen to the Small Screen, the Marx Brothers made an impact wherever ...
Read More >
A few months ago, we wrote about how the U.S. Court of Federal Claims (COFC) had defined when the pr...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Employers should prepare for the holiday shopping season and protect their employ...
Read More >
In a closely watched decision, Intel Corporation Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, Slip Op. No....
Read More >
Employees subject to the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act must pay time and one-h...
Read More >