04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
JULY - SEPTEMBER 2020 UPDATE - UNITED STATES- Mergers and acquisitions in the United States appear t...
Read More >
In recent weeks, the National Labor Relations Board has issued several employer-friendly decisions, ...
Read More >
Pursuant to Decree 1562 of 2019, employees can withdraw unemployment aid savings from the government...
Read More >
Whether a wrongfully dismissed employee is entitled to damages as compensation for the value of ince...
Read More >
The Ninth Circuit recently asked the California Supreme Court to provide it with guidance concerning...
Read More >
Sixty former workers of Load Trail, a leading trailer manufacturing business, have filed a class-act...
Read More >