04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
The National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) announced this morning that its final rule outlining t...
Read More >
As of April 13, 2020, Pennsylvania has over 24,000 confirmed COVID-19 cases. With a wide variety of ...
Read More >
It seems as though there is a minefield that employers must navigate to ensure that they fulfill the...
Read More >
In a favorable opinion for employers, the California Court of Appeal for the Second District conclud...
Read More >
With the pace of orthopedic medical practice recapitalizations showing no signs of slowing, it is ap...
Read More >
The withdrawal liability case of the year came to an anticlimactic end on Monday, September 16, 2019...
Read More >