04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
Based on a set of somewhat unusual facts, a federal district court in Ohio ruled that an employer th...
Read More >
A bill that has passed the House of Representatives called the Fairness for High-skilled Immigrants ...
Read More >
When preparing for a construction project, one of the first decisions that must be made is whether t...
Read More >
As we look forward to the New Year, Massachusetts employers should be aware of upcoming changes to t...
Read More >
In 2013, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) issued a final policy statement outlining three a...
Read More >
On June 25, 2019, the European Commission’s (EC) Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety (SCCS) pos...
Read More >