04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
Two former employees of Trader Joe’s have sued the company alleging breaches of fiduciary duty in t...
Read More >
The Fourth District Court of Appeal held that that while most of the California Coastal Commission’...
Read More >
President Trump’s October 9, 2019 overtures landed as music to the ears of many a grizzled immigrat...
Read More >
Waterloo has enacted Iowa’s first “Ban the Box” regulation and has also enacted rules as to how c...
Read More >
The coronavirus pandemic has weakened European economies and companies. EU and national governments ...
Read More >
Implementation of the rule rescinding H-4 work authorization has been delayed yet again. According t...
Read More >