04Mar
Ignorance Is Bliss (If You Are an ERISA Plaintiff)
On February 26, 2020, the Supreme Court ruled in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma, 589 U.S. ___ (2020) (Sulyma) that an ERISA1 plaintiff’s admitted receipt of disclosures about his retirement plan investments was insufficient to...
By:
Hanson Bridgett LLP
Related
The laws regarding the protections owed to pregnant employees got far broader a few years back. In f...
Read More >
On August 20, 2019, the Ninth Circuit dodged answering the question of whether morbid obesity is a d...
Read More >
The calculation of holiday pay has been the subject of a number of cases over recent weeks. There ar...
Read More >
What Happened: • On January 19, 2021, major changes to German antitrust/competition law, i.e. the ...
Read More >
The UK has well-established domestic antitrust and merger control regimes, enforced by the Competiti...
Read More >
On June 3, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the charge filing requirement under Title VII of ...
Read More >