X
03Mar

“Actual Knowledge” Required to Apply ERISA’S Three-Year Statute of Limitations to Fiduciary Breach Claims

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its decision in Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee et al. v. Sulyma (case number 18-1116). The decision requires a participant to have “actual knowledge” in order to apply ERISA’s three year statute of...
By: Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/actual-knowledge-required-to-apply-58276/

Related

Installation of Solar Panels Ain’t “Roofing Work” Under OSHA Says 9th Circuit

In a straightforward case, but one with widespread applicability today, the 9th Circuit Court of App...

Read More >

Freelancers’ California Court Loss Doesn’t Bode Well For Gig Economy Businesses

As readers of this blog know, three separate groups have filed lawsuits seeking to block or overturn...

Read More >

Watch Your Language: An Agreement to Arbitrate Employment Claims Must Allow for NLRA Claims Before the NLRB

The U.S. Supreme Court settled the long-standing dispute regarding the viability of class arbitratio...

Read More >

Global trade uncertainties put chemical companies at risk

Beset by ongoing tariff wars, Brexit fallout, heightened sanctions, and other geopolitical tumult, g...

Read More >

2019 Life Sciences Securities Litigation Roundup

2019 Filings - In 2019, the number of securities class action cases filed against life sciences com...

Read More >

Court Grants Injunction To Stop AB 51 — Mandatory Arbitration Still OK In CA

Here is the latest in a series of blogs about AB 51, the California bill that threatened mandatory a...

Read More >