X
Archive by tag: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLPReturn

District Court Permits Walmart to "Rollback" Job Offer Because of Undue Hardship from a Religious Accommodation

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin recently addressed an employer's responsibilities to accommodate an employee's religious beliefs. In EEOC v. Walmart Stores East, LP, the court examined whether Walmart was required to...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 26,2020 |

Illinois Appellate Court Holds Union Appointed Lawyers Are Immune From Individual Malpractice Suits Filed By Members

Zander v. Carlson, 2019 IL App (1st) 181868, November 21, 2019 - Union-appointed lawyers are immune from malpractice lawsuits filed by formerly represented union members, an Illinois appeals court has affirmed. The First District Appellate Court...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 26,2020 |

The Lawyers' Lawyer Newsletter - Recent Developments in Risk Management - February 2020

Law Partnerships – Age Discrimination Against Law Firm Partners – Owners or Employees – Civil Rights Laws - Von Kaenel v. Armstrong Teasdale, LLP, 943 F. 3d 1139 (2019) - Risk Management Issue: Are law firm partners "employees" and therefore...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 22,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: First Circuit Clarifies ERISA's Timing Requirements for Appealing Adverse Benefits Determination

In Fortier v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co., 916 F.3d 74 (1st Cir. 2019) the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit clarified ERISA's timing requirements with respect to appealing an adverse benefits determination and rejected a claimant's...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 13,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Courts Say Abuse of Discretion Standard is "Highly Deferential" to Plan Administrator's Denial of Benefits

In Rittinger v. Healthy Alliance Life Ins. Co., 914 F.3d 952 (5th Cir. Jan. 31, 2019), and Roebuck v. USAble Life, 380 F. Supp. 3d 852 (E.D. Ark. Mar. 30, 2019), the courts found no abuse of discretion where the ERISA plan administrators denied...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 12,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Fifth Circuit Defines Meaning of "Regular Occupation" Under LTD Policy

In Nichols v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co., 924 F.3d 80 (5th Cir. 2019), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that when an LTD policy funding an ERISA plan defines "regular occupation" as the way the claimant's job is performed in...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 11,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: California Federal Court Rules Claim Denial was Unequivocal

In Daneman v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 42881 (C.D. Cal. March 11, 2019), the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California held that an insurer's statement in a claim denial letter that it would reconsider the...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 10,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Sixth Circuit Rejects MSPA and ERISA Discrimination Claims

Seeking to control healthcare costs, many group health plans have adopted amendments that lower reimbursement rates for the treatment of end-stage renal disease ("ESRD"), which requires long-term dialysis treatment or a kidney transplant, resulting...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 10,2020 |

New Statutory Framework Mandated for Employers Seeking to Limit Notice to Putative Class Members in an Enforceable Arbitration Agreement

The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit recently articulated a new statutory framework for determining whether notice to a putative plaintiff should be issued under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). At issue was whether a...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 07,2020 |

The LHD/ERISA Advisor: Ohio State Court Affirms Dismissal of Bad Faith and Punitive Damages Claim

In Shah v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25695 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 19, 2019), the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio dismissed a plaintiff insured's bad faith and punitive damages claims where there was a genuine...By: Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Read More
Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP | Feb 06,2020 |
Page 1 of 8 FirstPrevious [1]