02Nov
COVID-19: High court issues preliminary ruling on interpretation of Material Adverse Effect clause
In a dispute between WEX (Inc.) (“WEX”) and the shareholders (the “Sellers”) of eNett International (Jersey) Limited (“eNett”) and Optal Limited (“Optal”), following an expedited trial on a number of preliminary issues, the High Court’s judgment (Travelport Limited & Others v WEX INC [2020] EWHC 2670 (Comm)) provides helpful guidance on the interpretation of material adverse effect (“MAE”) clauses which are not commonly used in English law acquisition documents. The judgment is also notable for...
By:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related
First Circuit: Two affiliated funds did not form an implied partnership liable for pension obligatio...
Read More >
This article focuses on 401(k) and 403(b) plans that are in one of the following situations: 1. The...
Read More >
The coronavirus, which originated in the Chinese city of Wuhan, has caused significant consternation...
Read More >
The COVID-19 pandemic has manifested itself with particular virulence in Spain. Its direct effects, ...
Read More >
The non-disclosure provision of a routine employment settlement agreement has typically been a commo...
Read More >
It is rare for the holding in a single criminal case to have such far-reaching implications that it ...
Read More >