X
17Jan

The Relevance Of The Spearin Doctrine In An Increasingly Design-Build World

Prior to the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in United States v. Spearin, 248 U.S. 132 (1918), virtually all construction risk was borne by the contractor, except for (i) express carve-outs set forth in a contract or (ii) performance rendered...
By: Moritt Hock & Hamroff LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-relevance-of-the-spearin-doctrine-47104/

Related

Arbitration Agreements May Violate the NLRA Absent Carve-outs

In Prime Healthcare Paradise Valley LLC, 368 NLRB No. 10 (2019), the National Labor Relations Board ...

Read More >

When the Negotiator of Deal Terms Is Negotiating Personal Compensation: Lessons for Board Members

Delaware Supreme Court reinstates case alleging fiduciary breach for failure to disclose CEO’s post...

Read More >

Retiree Health Insurance Coverage Can Become a Vested Right

Most of the promises contained in a union contract expire on the same date the contract expires, sub...

Read More >

New Stormwater Rules Proposed for Future California Construction and Development Projects

Our Environment, Land Use & Natural Resources Group deconstructs the California State Water Resource...

Read More >

Plaintiffs Cannot Bring Inverse Condemnation Claims Before a Public Agency Makes a Final Determination on Allowable Development

An inverse condemnation challenge to a permit denial is not ripe until the government makes a final ...

Read More >

How to fortify your business against AB5 and beyond

In early January, California truck drivers and transportation companies breathed a collective sigh o...

Read More >