14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
On October 31, 2019, the ARB held that an employee who merely “hints” that he or she intends to fi...
Read More >
In his classic 1998 business book “Who Moved my Cheese?,” Spencer Johnson discussed the need for b...
Read More >
On June 25, 2020, the Fifth Appellate District decided Honchariw v. County of Stanislaus, holding th...
Read More >
Head Chef Sexually Harassed Two Female Employees, Federal Agency Charges - BUFFALO - Green Lantern ...
Read More >
Virginia Eatery Routinely Subjected Gay Male Server and His Straight Friend to Homophobic Taunts and...
Read More >
As of Thursday, March 19, 2020, Ohio State agencies are reporting that construction projects will co...
Read More >