14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/channel-reinforces-that-akorn-is-the-45709/
Related
Earlier yesterday, New York State Empire State Development updated its Guidance for Determining Whet...
Read More >
The Situation: On June 21, 2020, the Saudi Minister of Tourism, Ahmed Al-Khateeb, announced the crea...
Read More >
As regular readers of the blog surely are aware, there are few provisions in an LLC or shareholders ...
Read More >
In the recent decision Newton v. Morgantown Machine & Hydraulics, the Supreme Court of Appeals of We...
Read More >
This week’s guest on Innovation In Compliance is Gini Dietrich, CEO and founder of Spin Sucks. Gini...
Read More >
It is becoming increasingly clear that the impact of the pandemic will continue to be felt once lock...
Read More >