14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
On February 1, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced—for the first time since 2010—a ...
Read More >
On October 10, 2019, Governor Gavin Newsom signed AB 673 into law, expanding an employee’s right to...
Read More >
From time to time, private equity sponsors will exit a portfolio company investment by selling the p...
Read More >
We’ve noted before that AB 51 – the California legislature’s latest attempt to attack workplace a...
Read More >
This week, we provide an update on the Philadelphia City Planning Commission’s newly issued regulat...
Read More >
The 2019 legal landscape of employee mobility continues to evolve, at times drastically. Courts and ...
Read More >