14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
On August 12, 2019, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) issued three proposed amendments to th...
Read More >
Philadelphia employers can no longer inquire about an applicant’s salary history. A prior ruling wh...
Read More >
On August 6, 2019, in State of Texas v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the U.S. Court of A...
Read More >
The Diaz Fritz Group Inc. was the general contractor for the construction of an addition to the Univ...
Read More >
In a welcomed attempt to align their approaches, the antitrust enforcers of the European Competition...
Read More >
Congress recently passed the Setting Every Community Up for Retirement Enhancement Act of 2019 (the ...
Read More >