X
14Jan

Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations

2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By: Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Source Url: https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/channel-reinforces-that-akorn-is-the-45709/

Related

State Updates Construction Essential Work Guidance, Amends Single Employee Exemption

Earlier yesterday, New York State Empire State Development updated its Guidance for Determining Whet...

Read More >

Saudi Arabia's New Tourism Development Fund

The Situation: On June 21, 2020, the Saudi Minister of Tourism, Ahmed Al-Khateeb, announced the crea...

Read More >

Consider Whether Your Buy-Sell Provision is a Call Option Before Pulling the Trigger

As regular readers of the blog surely are aware, there are few provisions in an LLC or shareholders ...

Read More >

West Virginia Supreme Court’s Newton Decision Clarifies Self-Defense in the Workplace

In the recent decision Newton v. Morgantown Machine & Hydraulics, the Supreme Court of Appeals of We...

Read More >

[Video] Innovation in Compliance-Episode 116, Gini Dietrich on Spotting Red Flags

This week’s guest on Innovation In Compliance is Gini Dietrich, CEO and founder of Spin Sucks. Gini...

Read More >

Construction Projects and Disputes: A Look Beyond the COVID-19 Lockdown, Part II

It is becoming increasingly clear that the impact of the pandemic will continue to be felt once lock...

Read More >