14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
BE CAREFUL! PROCEDURAL ISSUES MATTER IN MERGER CONTROL - The analysis of where to file mergers, acq...
Read More >
After reviewing the 2,203 pieces of proposed legislation introduced in the California legislature by...
Read More >
Third reform within less than 3 years - On 30 January 2020, the German Federal Ministry for Econom...
Read More >
California employers got a win with a recent court decision that an employee’s promise not to compe...
Read More >
On August 8, 2019, the Department of Labor issued an Opinion Letter explaining that employees may ta...
Read More >
Part 2: California Laws Impacting Public Agencies for 2020 - How do the laws passed last year by Ca...
Read More >