14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
As Arizona employers prepare for 2020, key minimum wages and exempt salary levels under city, state,...
Read More >
On November 7, 2019, a bill was introduced in the New Jersey legislature that would, like California...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: While employees often will toot their own horn, employers sometimes may have conc...
Read More >
Another area where Human Resources can help to more fully operationalize compliance is in succession...
Read More >
In DealLawyers.com, John Jenkins calls attention to U.S. District Court Judge Timothy S. Hillman's d...
Read More >
On July 11, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (the SCC) granted leave to appeal from the Alberta Cou...
Read More >