14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
In October, the Department of Labor issued proposed regulations that would allow retirement plan adm...
Read More >
Transaction expenses, including fees for legal counsel, accountants, financial advisors, brokers and...
Read More >
Last week, New Jersey Governor Phil Murphy signed an amendment to the New Jersey WARN Act, dramatica...
Read More >
Grass Seed Company Resolves Investigation Into Unlawful Severance Agreements Offered to Employees Du...
Read More >
On August 7, 2019, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s (ICE) Homeland Security Investigation...
Read More >
Seyfarth Synopsis: Establishments with 250 or more employees that are currently required to keep OS...
Read More >