14Jan
Channel Reinforces that Akorn is the Ceiling not the Floor for MAE Terminations
2018’s landmark decision Akorn, Inc. v. Fresenius Kabi AG marked the first time that the Chancery Court upheld a buyer’s use of a Material Adverse Effect (MAE) clause to terminate a merger agreement. However, the Court’s reasoning in the case...
By:
Dorsey & Whitney LLP
Related
As the end of the year approaches, many employers are preparing for the annual office holiday party....
Read More >
On June 20, 2019, New York lawmakers passed a pair of bills aimed at eliminating pay disparities bas...
Read More >
The close of the decade ended with a flurry of activity on the labor and employment front, creating ...
Read More >
The New York Legislature on June 19, 2019 unanimously passed expansive new protections for protected...
Read More >
In Ferra v. Loews Hollywood Hotel, LLC, the California Court of Appeal considered the method for det...
Read More >
Primary HSR filing threshold will be raised to $94 million - The Federal Trade Commission has anno...
Read More >